First Busey (BUSE) risk factors, 2025 10-K

First Busey's 2025 10-K lists 37 risk factors in 2 groups. No earlier 10-K is on file to compare against, so the most company-specific risks are read out below.

Risk factors listed
372 groups
Section length
6k wordsItem 1A

What dominates the section

  • CrossFirst acquisition increases integration, asset-size, regulatory, and leadership complexity.
  • Credit risk centers on commercial real estate, construction projects, borrower cash flows, and regional loan concentrations.
  • Interest-rate cycles threaten lending margins, deposit retention, funding costs, and liquidity.
  • Cybersecurity, vendor, fraud, privacy, and generative-AI risks are expanding operational exposure.

The risks most specific to First Busey

  • OPERATIONAL RISKS

    Regional economic vulnerabilities and reliance on key industries may heighten risks

    Banking markets depend heavily on central Illinois, St. Louis, Indiana, and southwest Florida, with university and healthcare funding vulnerabilities.

  • OPERATIONAL RISKS

    Prolonged elevated interest rates followed by easing cycles create financial volatility

    Elevated rates followed by rate cuts could create simultaneous margin, funding, liquidity, and loan-demand pressures.

  • REGULATORY AND LEGAL RISKS

    As Busey continues to grow in asset size and complexity, regulatory expectations and scrutiny will increase and could have a potential impact on Busey’s operations and business

    CrossFirst’s planned acquisition and Busey’s growth could trigger higher asset-based thresholds, reporting requirements, and regulatory scrutiny.

  • REGULATORY AND LEGAL RISKS

    Laws impacting cannabis-related businesses may have an impact on Busey’s operations and risk profile

    Illinois permits recreational cannabis while federal law prohibits marijuana, creating banking, compliance, and risk-profile complications.

  • REGULATORY AND LEGAL RISKS

    Loan concentrations in volatile markets could increase Busey’s exposure to economic downturns, adversely impacting financial stability

    Concentrated exposure to commercial real estate and particular industries, borrowers, or geographies could magnify losses during downturns.

  • REGULATORY AND LEGAL RISKS

    Real estate construction, land acquisition, and development loans are based upon estimates of costs and values associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate, and Busey may be exposed to significant losses on loans for these projects

    Construction, land acquisition, and development loans depend on uncertain project costs and values that may deteriorate before completion.

  • REGULATORY AND LEGAL RISKS

    Busey’s strategy of pursuing acquisitions exposes Busey to financial, execution, and operational risks that could negatively affect Busey

    The planned CrossFirst acquisition could create system, personnel, cultural, execution, and financial integration problems.

  • OPERATIONAL RISKS

    This cascading outsourcing structure adds complexity to communication and coordination, particularly when vendors operate in regions with varying regulatory standards. Risks are further amplified by geopolitical tensions, trade restrictions, or cyberattacks targeting these external partners

    Multi-tier vendors expose Busey to subcontractor failures, varying regulations, geopolitical disruption, trade restrictions, cyberattacks, and fraud.

  • OPERATIONAL RISKS

    The rising sophistication of fraudulent schemes poses a persistent challenge for financial institutions, with Busey being no exception. Fraudulent activities, such as identity theft, phishing, and unauthorized transactions, could result in financial losses, regulatory penalties, and erosion of customer trust

    Identity theft, phishing, unauthorized transactions, and evolving fraud tactics could cause losses, penalties, and customer distrust despite Verafin controls.

  • OPERATIONAL RISKS

    Rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence technologies introduces operational vulnerabilities

    Generative AI creates intellectual-property, compliance, privacy, impersonation, and social-engineering risks as adoption accelerates.

All 37 risk factors

Headings as the filing states them, in filing order.

OPERATIONAL RISKS

  1. 01Conditions in the financial market and economic conditions, including conditions in the states in which it operates, generally may adversely affect Busey’s business
  2. 02Shifts in consumer and business behavior during economic uncertainty may impact Busey’s business
  3. 03Regional economic vulnerabilities and reliance on key industries may heighten risks
  4. 04Prolonged elevated interest rates followed by easing cycles create financial volatility
  5. 05Declining interest rates result in reduced income from lending and investment activities, and may drive consumers to seek higher-yielding alternatives outside of traditional banking, both of which could negatively impact Busey’s liquidity and results of operations
  6. 30Busey’s framework for managing risks may not be fully effective in mitigating risk and loss
  7. 31Technological investments drive efficiency but introduce cybersecurity risks
  8. 32Outsourcing dependencies could disrupt operations and increase compliance risks
  9. 33This cascading outsourcing structure adds complexity to communication and coordination, particularly when vendors operate in regions with varying regulatory standards. Risks are further amplified by geopolitical tensions, trade restrictions, or cyberattacks targeting these external partners
  10. 34The rising sophistication of fraudulent schemes poses a persistent challenge for financial institutions, with Busey being no exception. Fraudulent activities, such as identity theft, phishing, and unauthorized transactions, could result in financial losses, regulatory penalties, and erosion of customer trust
  11. 35Busey’s ability to attract and retain experienced management and qualified personnel is critical to sustaining growth and executing its strategic objectives. The leadership transitions associated with the CrossFirst merger highlight the importance of talent management in preserving operational continuity
  12. 36Damage resulting from negative publicity could harm Busey’s reputation and adversely impact its business and financial condition
  13. 37Rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence technologies introduces operational vulnerabilities

REGULATORY AND LEGAL RISKS

  1. 06Changes in government policies and regulatory frameworks could adversely affect operations and profitability
  2. 07Table of Contents Contents of Item 1A. Risk Factors
  3. 08As Busey continues to grow in asset size and complexity, regulatory expectations and scrutiny will increase and could have a potential impact on Busey’s operations and business
  4. 09Evolving privacy, data protection, and information security laws and regulations present operational and legal challenges
  5. 10Laws impacting cannabis-related businesses may have an impact on Busey’s operations and risk profile
  6. 11Busey is or may become involved from time to time in suits, legal proceedings, information-gathering requests, investigations, and proceedings by governmental and self-regulatory agencies that may lead to adverse consequences
  7. 12Heightened credit risk associated with lending activities may result in insufficient credit loss provisions, which could have material adverse effects on Busey’s results of operations and financial condition
  8. 13High levels of non-performing assets could reduce Busey’s profitability and strain operational resources
  9. 14Loan concentrations in volatile markets could increase Busey’s exposure to economic downturns, adversely impacting financial stability
  10. 15Declining borrower cash flows and fluctuating collateral values may lead to significant losses across Busey’s commercial loan portfolio
  11. 16Real estate construction, land acquisition, and development loans are based upon estimates of costs and values associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate, and Busey may be exposed to significant losses on loans for these projects
  12. 17Credit quality deterioration in investment securities may result in significant realized losses, impacting Busey’s financial performance
  13. 18Failure to maintain sufficient capital to meet regulatory requirements could have material adverse effects on financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and regulatory compliance
  14. 19Liquidity risks could affect operations and jeopardize Busey’s business, financial condition, and results of operations
  15. 20If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research reports about Busey, if they adversely change their recommendations regarding Busey’s stock, or if Busey’s operating results do not meet their expectations, the price of Busey’s stock could decline
  16. 21Intense competition from traditional banks and fintech companies threatens market share
  17. 22Failure to adapt to rapid technological advancements could erode competitiveness
  18. 23Busey’s strategy of pursuing acquisitions exposes Busey to financial, execution, and operational risks that could negatively affect Busey
  19. 24Introduction of new products and services carries financial and strategic risks
  20. 25Digital asset trends introduce regulatory, competitive and scalability challenges
  21. 26Financial statements are created, in part, by estimates, assumptions, and methods used by management, which, if incorrect, could cause unexpected losses in the future
  22. 27Changes in accounting principles or guidelines could adversely affect financial reporting
  23. 28Busey is subject to changes in tax law and may not realize tax benefits which could adversely affect its results of operations
  24. 29Investments in tax-advantaged projects may not generate returns as anticipated and may have an adverse impact on Busey’s financial results

Other First Busey 10-Ks

  • 2026 10-K risk factors

    40 risks. First Busey Corp faces dominant risks from regional commercial banking vulnerabilities, interest rate fluctuations, credit losses, and digital banking competition.

    Filed Feb 26, 2026

About this page

Item 1A of the 10-K on EDGAR was split into its risk factors and, where the company's previous 10-K is on file, each heading was matched to last year's and the text compared word for word. The headings are the filing's own. The one-line readings and the overview were written by a language model from the text of the new, dropped, and rewritten risks; they refer to risks by position and cannot misquote a heading.

First Busey (BUSE) Risk Factors: 2025 10-K, What Changed | Gloomberb