What dominates the section
- Regulation, legal proceedings and supervisory actions dominate JPMorganChase’s risk disclosures.
- Market, credit, interest-rate and liquidity risks span its consumer, wholesale and trading businesses.
- Resolution planning, capital requirements and operational-system disruptions could restrict funding, distributions or client service.
The risks most specific to JPMorgan Chase &
JPMorganChase’s businesses are highly regulated and are significantly affected by applicable law and supervisory expectations
Extensive global financial-services regulation and supervisory expectations can constrain how JPMorganChase operates and structures its businesses.
JPMorganChase faces significant legal risks from civil and governmental proceedings, including litigation, investigations and enforcement actions
Civil lawsuits, government investigations, enforcement actions and criminal proceedings could produce significant legal costs, penalties and reputational harm.
JPMorganChase’s businesses could be negatively affected by economic uncertainty resulting from political and geopolitical developments
Political and geopolitical developments could create economic uncertainty and damage JPMorganChase’s market positions, investment portfolio, liquidity, capital or results.
Changes in interest rates and credit spreads could adversely affect JPMorganChase’s earnings or its liquidity and capital levels
Interest-rate and credit-spread changes could reduce earnings, increase funding costs, weaken liquidity and capital, or impair variable-rate borrowers.
JPMorganChase could be negatively affected by adverse changes in the financial condition of clients, counterparties, CCPs and other market participants
Financial distress at corporations, financial institutions, asset managers, hedge funds, exchanges, governments or other counterparties could cause JPMorganChase losses.
JPMorganChase could incur significant losses arising from concentrations of credit and market risk
Concentrated exposures to related clients, industries, regions or business profiles could produce outsized credit and market losses.
JPMorganChase’s ability to operate its businesses could be impaired if its liquidity is constrained
Market disruption, regulatory actions, deposit declines or inability to sell assets could constrain JPMorganChase’s liquidity and impair operations.
JPMorganChase has experienced credit ratings downgrades in the past, and there is no assurance that JPMorganChase’s credit ratings will not be downgraded in the future. Furthermore, any such downgrade could occur at a time of broader market instability, limiting JPMorganChase’s options for responding
Credit-rating downgrades could restrict capital-market access, increase securities costs, trigger collateral or funding requirements, and reduce willing counterparties.
JPMorganChase’s ability to distribute capital to shareholders, and to support its business activities could be limited if it does not satisfy applicable regulatory capital requirements
Higher or unmet regulatory capital requirements could limit shareholder distributions and JPMorganChase’s ability to support business activities.
JPMorganChase’s businesses could be adversely affected by the failure or disruption of operational systems on which they depend
Failures or disruptions in JPMorganChase’s, acquired businesses’ or external providers’ operational systems could harm clients, counterparties and the firm.
All 66 risk factors
Headings as the filing states them, in filing order.
Other
- 01credit risk with respect to clients, customers, counterparties and other market participants
- 02of local economic, political, regulatory and social factors on JPMorganChase’s business in certain countries in which it operates
- 03The above summary is subject in its entirety to the discussion of the risk factors set forth below
- 04“applicable law” means the laws, rules and regulations that apply to JPMorganChase’s businesses in the jurisdictions in which it operates
- 05JPMorganChase’s businesses are highly regulated and are significantly affected by applicable law and supervisory expectations
- 06Differences in the supervision and regulation of financial services firms could require JPMorganChase to modify its operations and incur higher operational and compliance costs
- 07JPMorganChase faces significant legal risks from civil and governmental proceedings, including litigation, investigations and enforcement actions
- 08Resolving an investigation by a governmental authority could subject JPMorganChase to significant penalties and other repercussions
- 09JPMorganChase’s compliance risk and operating costs could be higher in jurisdictions with less predictable legal, regulatory and judicial frameworks
- 10JPMorganChase's business and operations could be negatively affected by governmental policies that discourage or penalize doing business with certain industries or that require specific business practices
- 11Changes in the requirements for the regulatory evaluation of JPMorganChase’s resolution plan could increase its funding or operational costs or require restructuring or curtailment of its businesses
- 12Any such changes could result in JPMorganChase making changes to its legal entity structure or to certain of its internal or external activities, which could increase its funding or operational costs, or hamper its ability to serve clients and customers
- 13Holders of JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s debt and equity securities will absorb losses if it were to enter into a resolution
- 14The FDIC has similarly indicated that a single point of entry recapitalization model would be its expected strategy to resolve a systemically important financial institution, such as the Parent Company, under Title II. However, the FDIC has not formally adopted or committed to any specific resolution strategy
- 15JPMorganChase’s businesses could be negatively affected by economic uncertainty resulting from political and geopolitical developments
- 16These risks could become highly correlated or combine in unexpected ways under certain circumstances, including geopolitically challenging situations in regions such as Russia, the Middle East and China
- 17Adverse economic and market events and conditions could negatively affect JPMorganChase’s results of operations and investment and market-making positions
- 18commodities, and the duration of any such changes, and
- 19The above factors could be affected by global economic, market and political events and conditions, including the regulatory environment, monetary policies, trade policies, and actions taken by central banks or governmental authorities
- 20JPMorganChase’s consumer businesses could be negatively affected by adverse economic conditions and adverse impacts of governmental policies
- 21Unfavorable market and economic conditions could adversely affect JPMorganChase’s wholesale businesses
- 22prices, and could lead to further withdrawals based on the weaker investment performance
- 23Changes in interest rates and credit spreads could adversely affect JPMorganChase’s earnings or its liquidity and capital levels
- 24All of these outcomes could adversely affect JPMorganChase’s earnings or its liquidity and capital levels, with more severe impacts in a prolonged period of high interest rates
- 25When credit spreads widen, it becomes more expensive for JPMorganChase to borrow
- 26JPMorganChase’s results could be materially affected by market fluctuations and significant changes in the valuation of financial instruments
- 27JPMorganChase could be negatively affected by adverse changes in the financial condition of clients, counterparties, CCPs and other market participants
- 28All of the foregoing events could increase JPMorganChase’s operational and litigation costs, and JPMorganChase could suffer losses to the extent that the realized value of any collateral that it has received is insufficient to cover those losses
- 29JPMorganChase could suffer losses if the value of collateral declines
- 30JPMorganChase could incur significant losses arising from concentrations of credit and market risk
- 31More broadly, widespread defaults on consumer debt could lead to recessionary conditions in the U.S. economy, and JPMorganChase’s consumer businesses could earn lower revenues in such an environment
- 32JPMorganChase’s ability to operate its businesses could be impaired if its liquidity is constrained
- 33limited during periods of market stress, low investor confidence or significant market illiquidity
- 34JPMorgan Chase & Co. is a holding company and depends on its subsidiaries for funding to make payments on its outstanding securities
- 35JPMorganChase’s liquidity and cost of funding could be adversely affected by downgrades in its credit ratings
- 36JPMorganChase has experienced credit ratings downgrades in the past, and there is no assurance that JPMorganChase’s credit ratings will not be downgraded in the future. Furthermore, any such downgrade could occur at a time of broader market instability, limiting JPMorganChase’s options for responding
- 37JPMorganChase’s ability to distribute capital to shareholders, and to support its business activities could be limited if it does not satisfy applicable regulatory capital requirements
- 38Although more likely in times of stress, JPMorganChase may use its regulatory capital buffers allowing capital ratios to decline below regulatory requirements, subjecting it to restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to its executive officers
- 39JPMorganChase’s businesses could be adversely affected by the failure or disruption of operational systems on which they depend
- 40There can be no assurance that these and other types of operational failures or disruptions will not occur in the future
- 41JPMorganChase’s interconnectedness with clients, customers and other external parties could be a source of significant operational risk
- 42A successful cyber attack could cause significant harm to JPMorganChase and its clients and customers
- 43JPMorganChase or its clients, customers, counterparties or employees
- 44JPMorganChase has experienced security breaches due to cyber attacks in the past, and future breaches are inevitable. Any such breach could result in serious and harmful consequences for JPMorganChase or its clients and customers
- 45including cryptographic protections, potentially exposing data
- 46Furthermore, a third-party could misappropriate confidential information obtained by intercepting signals or communications from mobile devices used by JPMorganChase’s employees
- 47JPMorganChase’s businesses could be adversely affected if it fails to identify and address operational risks associated with the introduction of or changes to products, services, delivery platforms or technologies
- 48JPMorganChase faces substantial legal and operational risks related to the processing and safeguarding of personal information
- 49JPMorganChase’s operations, results and reputation could be harmed by occurrences of extraordinary events beyond its control
- 50JPMorganChase does business, to comply with applicable law
- 51Any failure to maintain adequate data management processes could adversely affect JPMorganChase’s ability to effectively manage its businesses, comply with applicable law or make informed business decisions
- 52Any of these deficiencies could impair JPMorganChase’s ability to make sound business decisions, cause it to incur higher operational and compliance costs, result in operational breakdowns or failure to meet regulatory requirements, negatively affect clients and customers, or cause reputational harm
- 53Enhanced regulatory and other standards for the oversight of JPMorganChase’s vendors and other service providers could result in higher costs and other potential exposures
- 54JPMorganChase could incur losses arising from any significant inadequacy or lapse in its risk management framework and control environment
- 55from the historical environments upon which the models were developed. Any heightened uncertainty associated with these estimates may necessitate a greater degree of judgment and analytics to inform any adjustments that JPMorganChase may make to model outputs
- 56A significant inadequacy in disclosure or financial reporting controls could negatively affect JPMorganChase’s business, operations and reputation
- 57JPMorganChase’s results or competitive standing could suffer if its management fails to develop and execute effective business strategies and to anticipate changes affecting those strategies
- 58Competition in the financial services industry could lead to negative effects on JPMorganChase’s results of operations
- 59JPMorganChase’s operations, results, and competitive standing could be adversely affected by the development of advanced technologies such as AI
- 60The effects of climate change could adversely affect JPMorganChase’s business and operations, both directly and as a result of impacts on its clients and customers
- 61Conduct failure by JPMorganChase employees could trigger litigation and regulatory actions and harm JPMorganChase’s reputation
- 62Damage to JPMorganChase’s reputation could negatively affect its business, results and prospects
- 63Failure to effectively manage potential conflicts of interest or to satisfy fiduciary obligations could result in litigation and enforcement actions and cause reputational harm
- 64An outbreak or escalation of hostilities between countries or within a country or region could have a material adverse effect on the global economy and on JPMorganChase’s businesses within the affected region or globally
- 65JPMorganChase’s business and operations in certain countries could be adversely affected by local economic, political, regulatory and social factors
- 66Various factors could impact JPMorganChase’s workforce
About this page
Item 1A of the 10-K on EDGAR was split into its risk factors and, where the company's previous 10-K is on file, each heading was matched to last year's and the text compared word for word. The headings are the filing's own. The one-line readings and the overview were written by a language model from the text of the new, dropped, and rewritten risks; they refer to risks by position and cannot misquote a heading.