Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG) risk factors, 2026 10-K

Public Service Enterprise Group's 2026 10-K lists 38 risk factors in 3 groups. Against the prior year's 39: 3 new, 4 dropped, 10 substantially reworded.

Risk factors listed
383 groups
New this year
3vs 39 last year
Dropped
4since the prior 10-K
Substantially reworded
10of those kept
Section length
10k wordsItem 1A

What the changes say

  • PJM supply shortages, driven by data centers, EVs and electrification, are raising capacity prices and customer supply rates.
  • New disclosure highlights limited control over the Peach Bottom nuclear plants operated by a third party.
  • Climate and environmental risks now emphasize customer/business costs, climate lawsuits, severe weather and stricter remediation requirements.
  • Broad pandemic, catastrophe, natural-gas-stranding and demand-growth disclosures were removed.

What changed since the prior 10-K

New

  • NewGENERAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS

    Any of these risks could cause the amounts of our investments and/or our return on these investments to be lower than expected, which could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations through lower investment opportunities and/or lower returns

    PJM may lack enough generation for rising demand from data centers, EVs and electrification, increasing capacity prices, customer rates and regulatory uncertainty.

  • NewRISKS RELATED TO OUR GENERATION BUSINESS

    Generation activities at, and the operation of, the Peach Bottom plants present risks similar to those described above in GENERAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS and RISKS RELATED TO OUR GENERATION BUSINESS and below in REGULATORY, LEGISLATIVE AND LEGAL RISKS

    PSE&G owns 50% of Peach Bottom but a third party operates the nuclear plants, limiting its control over associated risks.

  • NewREGULATORY, LEGISLATIVE AND LEGAL RISKS

    portfolio, the full remediation costs will likely be material in the aggregate. The costs could potentially include costs for, among other things, excavating soil, implementation of institutional controls, and the construction, operation and maintenance of engineering controls

    Stricter environmental laws may require costly soil excavation, institutional controls, and engineering controls across the portfolio.

Dropped

  • DroppedGENERAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS

    investments and our ability to meet our targets of net zero GHG emissions by 2030 for Scopes 1 and 2 emissions, or other GHG emissions reduction or climate-related goals that we may set from time to time, in a cost-effective manner or at all

  • DroppedGENERAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS

    We are also exposed to the risk of pandemics, which could result in service disruptions and delays or otherwise impair our ability to timely provide service to our customers, complete our investment projects or obtain timely recovery of our costs

  • DroppedGENERAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS

    An increasing demand for power and load growth, potentially compounded by a shift away from natural gas toward increased electrification could cause reliability issues and higher costs for customers, which could lead to potential pressure on fair and timely recovery of our investments and proposed programs

  • DroppedREGULATORY, LEGISLATIVE AND LEGAL RISKS

    Actions by state and federal government agencies could also result in reduced reliance on natural gas and could potentially result in stranding natural gas assets owned and operated by PSE&G, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations

Reworded

  • 84% rewrittenGENERAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS

    To the extent financial markets view climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as a financial risk, our ability to access capital markets could be negatively affected or cause us to receive less than favorable terms and conditions

    The risk shifts from broad climate regulation and GHG compliance costs to customer and business costs, plus climate-change lawsuits seeking damages, penalties or injunctions.

  • 67% rewrittenREGULATORY, LEGISLATIVE AND LEGAL RISKS

    We may be adversely affected by changes in energy regulatory policies, including energy and capacity market design rules and developments affecting transmission

    The disclosure drops specific locational-capacity-market and transmission details and emphasizes PJM rule changes, auction delays and resulting regulatory and business uncertainty.

  • 47% rewrittenGENERAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS

    We are subject to physical, financial and transition risks related to climate change, including potentially increased legislative and regulatory burdens and changing customer preferences, and we may be subject to lawsuits, all of which could impact our businesses and results of operations

    The focus shifts from detailed customer technology and usage changes to long-term gas and electric demand, generation and T&D investment needs, and severe-weather outages and damage.

  • 41% rewrittenREGULATORY, LEGISLATIVE AND LEGAL RISKS

    We are subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that may significantly limit or affect our businesses, result in significant litigation, adversely impact our business plans and/or expose us to significant environmental fines, costs and other liabilities

    Was: We are subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that may significantly limit or affect our businesses, adversely impact our business plans or expose us to significant environmental fines and liabilities

  • 37% rewrittenREGULATORY, LEGISLATIVE AND LEGAL RISKS

    We are subject to comprehensive federal regulation that affects, or may affect, our businesses

    The risk adds PJM payment rules and hazardous-substance handling and liability, while dropping the detailed FERC formula-rate recovery discussion.

  • 35% rewrittenGENERAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS

    Failure to obtain regulatory or other approvals, delays, cost escalations or otherwise unsuccessful construction and development could materially affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows

    Opposition is now described as applying to energy infrastructure generally rather than specifically to natural-gas infrastructure.

  • 28% rewrittenRISKS RELATED TO OUR GENERATION BUSINESS

    The introduction or expansion of technologies related to energy generation, distribution and consumption and changes in customer usage patterns could adversely impact us

    The risk retains renewable, storage, demand-management and on-site generation competition but removes detailed examples of distributed technologies and subsidy effects.

  • 27% rewrittenGENERAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS

    We are party to, and are also exploring opportunities to enter into, several contracts from which we currently or may in the future derive significant revenues

    The LIPA operating agreement is described as extended through 2030, replacing the prior uncertainty over renewal after 2025.

  • 24% rewrittenGENERAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS

    Disruptions or cost increases in our supply chain, including labor shortages, could materially impact our business

  • 24% rewrittenRISKS RELATED TO OUR GENERATION BUSINESS

    Identifying and correcting any of these issues may require significant time and expense. Depending on the materiality of the issue, we may choose to close a plant rather than incur the expense of restarting it or returning it to full capacity

All 38 risk factors

Headings as the filing states them, in filing order.

GENERAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS

  1. 01Inability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for, or construct T&D, and our nuclear generation projects could adversely impact our businesses
  2. 02Failure to obtain regulatory or other approvals, delays, cost escalations or otherwise unsuccessful construction and development could materially affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows35% rewritten
  3. 03Any of these risks could cause the amounts of our investments and/or our return on these investments to be lower than expected, which could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations through lower investment opportunities and/or lower returnsnew
  4. 04We are subject to physical, financial and transition risks related to climate change, including potentially increased legislative and regulatory burdens and changing customer preferences, and we may be subject to lawsuits, all of which could impact our businesses and results of operations47% rewritten
  5. 05To the extent financial markets view climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as a financial risk, our ability to access capital markets could be negatively affected or cause us to receive less than favorable terms and conditions84% rewritten
  6. 06Any inability to recover the carrying amount of our long-lived assets could result in future impairment charges which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations
  7. 07Disruptions or cost increases in our supply chain, including labor shortages, could materially impact our business24% rewritten
  8. 08Inability to maintain sufficient liquidity in the amounts and at the times needed or access sufficient capital at reasonable rates or on commercially reasonable terms could adversely impact our business
  9. 09maintenance of our investment grade credit ratings
  10. 10Cybersecurity attacks, data breaches, or intrusions or other disruptions to our IT, operational or other systems could adversely impact our businesses
  11. 11breaches of vendors’ infrastructures where our confidential information is stored
  12. 12Failure to attract and retain a qualified workforce could have an adverse effect on our business
  13. 13Inflation, including increases in the costs of equipment and materials, fuel, services and labor could adversely affect our operating results
  14. 14Covenants in our debt instruments and credit agreements may adversely affect our business
  15. 15Financial market performance directly affects the asset values of our defined benefit plan trust funds and Nuclear Decommissioning Trust (NDT) Fund. Market performance and other factors could decrease the value of trust assets and could result in the need for significant additional funding
  16. 16We are party to, and are also exploring opportunities to enter into, several contracts from which we currently or may in the future derive significant revenues27% rewritten
  17. 17Artificial Intelligence is an emerging area of technology that has the potential to impact various aspects of our business operations and customer interactions

RISKS RELATED TO OUR GENERATION BUSINESS

  1. 18Fluctuations in the wholesale power and natural gas markets could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
  2. 19federal and state power, market and environmental regulation and legislation, including financial incentives for new renewable energy generation capacity that could lead to oversupply and price suppression
  3. 20We may be unable to obtain an adequate nuclear fuel supply in the future
  4. 21the loss of critical infrastructure, acts of war or terrorist attacks (including cybersecurity breaches) or catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, severe storms or other similar occurrences could impede the delivery of such fuels
  5. 22The introduction or expansion of technologies related to energy generation, distribution and consumption and changes in customer usage patterns could adversely impact us28% rewritten
  6. 23We are subject to third-party credit risk relating to our sale of nuclear generation output
  7. 24There may be periods when PSEG Power generation may not operate and/or may not be able to meet its commitments under forward sale obligations and PJM rules at a reasonable cost or at all
  8. 25Identifying and correcting any of these issues may require significant time and expense. Depending on the materiality of the issue, we may choose to close a plant rather than incur the expense of restarting it or returning it to full capacity24% rewritten
  9. 26Generation activities at, and the operation of, the Peach Bottom plants present risks similar to those described above in GENERAL OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS and RISKS RELATED TO OUR GENERATION BUSINESS and below in REGULATORY, LEGISLATIVE AND LEGAL RISKSnew

REGULATORY, LEGISLATIVE AND LEGAL RISKS

  1. 27PSE&G’s revenues, earnings and results of operations are dependent upon state laws and regulations that affect distribution and related activities
  2. 28PSE&G’s proposed investment projects or programs may not be fully approved by regulators and actual capital investment by PSE&G may be lower than planned, which would cause lower than anticipated rate base
  3. 29We are subject to comprehensive federal regulation that affects, or may affect, our businesses37% rewritten
  4. 30point adder for RTO membership in 2008. Elimination of the adder for RTO membership would reduce PSE&G’s annual Net Income and annual cash inflows by approximately $40 million
  5. 31As further described in Item 7. MD&A—Executive Overview of 2025 and Future Outlook, PSEG Power’s Salem 1, Salem 2 and Hope Creek nuclear plants were awarded ZECs by the BPU through May 2025
  6. 32We may be adversely affected by changes in energy regulatory policies, including energy and capacity market design rules and developments affecting transmission67% rewritten
  7. 33Our ownership and operation of nuclear power plants involve regulatory risks as well as financial, environmental and health and safety risks
  8. 34In addition, if a unit cannot be operated through the end of its current estimated useful life, our results of operations could be adversely affected by increased depreciation rates, impairment charges and accelerated future decommissioning costs
  9. 35We are subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that may significantly limit or affect our businesses, result in significant litigation, adversely impact our business plans and/or expose us to significant environmental fines, costs and other liabilities41% rewritten
  10. 36portfolio, the full remediation costs will likely be material in the aggregate. The costs could potentially include costs for, among other things, excavating soil, implementation of institutional controls, and the construction, operation and maintenance of engineering controlsnew
  11. 37We may not receive necessary licenses, permits and siting approvals in a timely manner or at all, which could adversely impact our business and results of operations
  12. 38Changes in tax laws and regulations may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows

Other Public Service Enterprise Group 10-Ks

  • 2025 10-K risk factors

    39 risks. Capital spending depends on regulatory approvals, cost recovery, and successful construction of T&D, clean-energy, and nuclear projects.

    Filed Feb 25, 2025

About this page

Item 1A of the 10-K on EDGAR was split into its risk factors and, where the company's previous 10-K is on file, each heading was matched to last year's and the text compared word for word. The headings are the filing's own. The one-line readings and the overview were written by a language model from the text of the new, dropped, and rewritten risks; they refer to risks by position and cannot misquote a heading.

Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG) Risk Factors: 2026 10-K, What Changed | Gloomberb