Trustmark (TRMK) risk factors, 2025 10-K

Trustmark's 2025 10-K lists 34 risk factors in 3 groups. No earlier 10-K is on file to compare against, so the most company-specific risks are read out below.

Risk factors listed
343 groups
Section length
10k wordsItem 1A

What dominates the section

  • Interest-rate, liquidity and credit risks dominate because Trustmark relies on net interest income, deposits and lending.
  • Regulatory compliance and capital requirements could constrain operations, growth and shareholder returns.
  • Technology, cybersecurity, third-party and climate-related risks threaten service continuity and customer relationships.

The risks most specific to Trustmark

  • Risks Related to Trustmark’s Business

    Trustmark may be adversely affected by the transition from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) as a reference rate

    Trustmark must replace LIBOR references as most U.S. LIBOR term rates end, creating potential contract, pricing and operational risks.

  • Risks Related to Trustmark’s Business

    Trustmark is subject to lending risk, which could impact the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and results of operations

    Deteriorating housing and real estate markets could increase loan delinquencies, credit losses and the allowance for credit losses.

  • Risks Related to Trustmark’s Business

    Trustmark is subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activities

    Foreclosed properties securing Trustmark loans may contain hazardous or toxic substances, creating environmental liabilities.

  • Risks Related to Trustmark’s Business

    Failure by Trustmark to perform satisfactorily on its CRA evaluations could make it more difficult for Trustmark’s business to grow

    Poor Community Reinvestment Act evaluations could hinder branch expansion, mergers, acquisitions and other growth initiatives.

  • Risks Related to Trustmark’s Business

    Trustmark’s use of third-party service providers and Trustmark’s other ongoing third-party business relationships are subject to increasing regulatory requirements and attention

    Failures or regulatory problems involving third-party service providers and business partners could disrupt Trustmark’s daily operations.

  • Operational Risks

    If Trustmark is required to repurchase a significant number of mortgage loans that it had previously sold, such repurchases could negatively affect earnings

    Mortgage-loan buyers could require Trustmark to repurchase loans with origination or representation-and-warranty defects, reducing earnings.

  • Operational Risks

    Trustmark may experience disruptions of its operating systems or breaches in its information system security

    Cyberattacks, security breaches or operating-system disruptions could expose confidential information and interrupt virtually all aspects of Trustmark’s business.

  • Risk Related to Acquisition Activity

    Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, could have a significant negative impact on Trustmark’s business

    Hurricanes could damage collateral and borrowers’ businesses because many loans are tied to Gulf Coast areas of Alabama, Florida, Mississippi and Texas.

  • Risk Related to Acquisition Activity

    Expectations around Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) practices as well as climate change and related legislative and regulatory initiatives could adversely affect Trustmark’s business and results of operations, including indirectly through impact to its customers

    Changing ESG and climate expectations, disclosures and regulations could raise costs or harm customers and Trustmark’s results.

All 34 risk factors

Headings as the filing states them, in filing order.

Risks Related to Trustmark’s Business

  1. 01Trustmark’s largest source of revenue (net interest income) is subject to interest rate risk
  2. 02In general, for a given change in interest rates, the amount of the change in value (positive or negative) is larger for assets and liabilities with longer remaining maturities. The shape of the yield curve may affect new loan yields, funding costs and investment income differently
  3. 03Trustmark may be adversely affected by the transition from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) as a reference rate
  4. 04Trustmark is subject to lending risk, which could impact the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and results of operations
  5. 05Trustmark is subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activities
  6. 06Declines in asset values may result in credit losses and adversely affect the value of Trustmark’s investments
  7. 07Trustmark is subject to liquidity risk, which could disrupt its ability to meet its financial obligations
  8. 08In addition to the risk that one or more of the funding sources may become constrained due to market conditions unrelated to Trustmark, there is the risk that Trustmark’s credit profile may decline such that one or more of these funding sources becomes partially or wholly unavailable to Trustmark
  9. 09Trustmark’s business may be adversely affected by conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions in general
  10. 10Market developments and the resulting economic pressure on consumers may affect consumer confidence levels and may cause increases in delinquencies and default rates, which, among other effects, could further affect Trustmark’s charge-offs and provision for credit losses
  11. 11Trustmark operates in a highly competitive financial services industry
  12. 12The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect Trustmark
  13. 13Trustmark is subject to extensive government regulation and supervision and possible enforcement and other legal actions
  14. 14Trustmark is subject to numerous laws designed to protect consumers, including fair lending laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to a wide variety of sanctions
  15. 15Failure by Trustmark to perform satisfactorily on its CRA evaluations could make it more difficult for Trustmark’s business to grow
  16. 16Trustmark is subject to stringent capital requirements
  17. 17Trustmark’s use of third-party service providers and Trustmark’s other ongoing third-party business relationships are subject to increasing regulatory requirements and attention

Operational Risks

  1. 18There may be risks resulting from the extensive use of models in Trustmark’s business
  2. 19Trustmark could be required to write down goodwill and other intangible assets
  3. 20Trustmark holds other real estate and may acquire and hold significant additional amounts, which could lead to increased operating expenses and vulnerability to additional declines in real property values
  4. 21If Trustmark is required to repurchase a significant number of mortgage loans that it had previously sold, such repurchases could negatively affect earnings
  5. 22Changes in retail distribution strategies and consumer behavior may adversely impact Trustmark’s investments in premises, equipment, technology and other assets and may lead to increased expenditures to change its retail distribution channel
  6. 23Trustmark may experience disruptions of its operating systems or breaches in its information system security
  7. 24Trustmark must utilize new technologies to deliver its products and services, which could require significant resources and expose Trustmark to additional risks, including cyber-security risks
  8. 25Trustmark’s controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented
  9. 26Trustmark has been named from time to time as a defendant in litigation relating to its businesses and activities. Litigation may include claims for substantial compensatory or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages
  10. 27Damage to Trustmark’s reputation could have a significant negative impact on Trustmark’s business

Risk Related to Acquisition Activity

  1. 28Potential acquisitions by Trustmark may disrupt Trustmark’s business and dilute shareholder value
  2. 29The stock price of financial institutions, like Trustmark, can be volatile
  3. 30volatility affecting the financial markets in general
  4. 31Changes in accounting standards may affect how Trustmark reports its financial condition and results of operations
  5. 32Trustmark may not be able to attract or retain key employees
  6. 33Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, could have a significant negative impact on Trustmark’s business
  7. 34Expectations around Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) practices as well as climate change and related legislative and regulatory initiatives could adversely affect Trustmark’s business and results of operations, including indirectly through impact to its customers

Other Trustmark 10-Ks

  • 2026 10-K risk factors

    36 risks, 3 new, 1 dropped, 10 reworded since the prior year. New risks emphasize lingering liquidity, uninsured-deposit and capital concerns after the 2023 bank failures.

    Filed Feb 23, 2026

About this page

Item 1A of the 10-K on EDGAR was split into its risk factors and, where the company's previous 10-K is on file, each heading was matched to last year's and the text compared word for word. The headings are the filing's own. The one-line readings and the overview were written by a language model from the text of the new, dropped, and rewritten risks; they refer to risks by position and cannot misquote a heading.

Trustmark (TRMK) Risk Factors: 2025 10-K, What Changed | Gloomberb