What the changes say
- Added focus on digital asset treasury companies and un-capped ether supply dynamics impacting the Trust.
- Highlighted potential regulatory developments such as the CLARITY Act of 2025 and broker-dealer in-kind creation rules.
What changed since the prior 10-K
New
- New
Unlike some digital assets, which have a limit on outstanding supply, there is no limit on ether supply
Unlike some digital assets with a hard cap, ether has no limit on its supply and will continue to be issued to validators, which could be inflationary and reduce its value.
- New
Digital asset treasury companies risk
Non-crypto companies holding corporate treasuries in digital assets could create procyclical price volatility and downward pressure on ether prices during market downturns.
- New
Operational cost may exceed the award for validating transaction, and increased transaction fees may adversely affect the usage of the Ethereum network
High transaction fees could deter Ethereum network usage, while low validation rewards could cause validators to operate at a loss or cease operations.
- New
If regulators or public utilities take actions that restrict or otherwise impact mining activities, such actions could result in decreased security of a digital asset network, including the Ethereum network, which could adversely affect the value of the Shares
Energy consumption concerns and state-level mining restrictions could reduce the security of proof-of-stake networks like Ethereum and create negative market sentiment.
- New
Additionally, miners on proof-of-work networks may be forced to cease operations during an electricity shortage or power outage, or if electricity prices increase where the mining activities are performed
Miners on proof-of-work networks may face power outages or higher electricity prices, which could indirectly impact proof-of-stake network sentiment and share value.
- New
Any of these factors could adversely affect the performance of the Trust and the value of the Shares
Difficulties in share creation and redemption by Authorized Participants or custodians could cause the share price to diverge from the net asset value of ether.
- New
The Shares may trade at a price that is at, above or below the Trust’s NAV as a result of the non-current trading hours between NASDAQ and the digital asset market
Non-current trading hours between NASDAQ and the 24-hour digital asset market could cause share prices to gap down when the exchange reopens after negative ether price moves.
Dropped
- Dropped
an active derivatives market for ether or for digital assets generally;
- Dropped
Risk Factors Related to ERISA
Reworded
- 83% rewritten
The limited ability to facilitate in-kind creations and redemptions of Shares could have adverse consequences for the Trust
Added reference to the May 15, 2025 SEC and FINRA statements permitting broker-dealers to facilitate in-kind creations and redemptions for spot crypto ETFs.
Was: The lack of ability to facilitate in-kind creations and redemptions of Shares could have adverse consequences for the Trust
- 74% rewritten
the liquidity of digital asset markets and any increase or decrease in trading volume or market making on digital asset markets;
Added an active derivatives market for ether and tariffs to the list of market liquidity and volatility factors.
- 68% rewritten
The Trust is not a registered investment company under the Investment Company Act, and the Sponsor believes that the Trust is not required to register under such act. Consequently, Shareholders do not have the regulatory protections provided to investors in investment companies
Added mention of the proposed Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act) which could expand CFTC powers over spot digital assets.
- 62% rewritten
There is no guarantee that every employee, officer, director, or similar person associated with the Sponsor, Trustee, or the BlackRock Affiliates will comply with the Policies, duties and training and refrain from engaging in insider trading in violation of their duties to the Trust and Sponsor
Retained insider trading policy compliance risks with minor grammatical phrasing updates.
- 51% rewritten
Coinbase serves as the ether custodian and the prime execution agent for several competing exchange-traded Ethereum products, which could adversely affect the Trust’s operations and ultimately the value of the Shares
Added digital asset treasury companies as entities utilizing Coinbase and the Additional Ether Custodian alongside competing exchange-traded ether products.
Was: Coinbase serves as the ether custodian and prime execution agent for several competing exchange-traded Ethereum products, which could adversely affect the Trust’s operations and ultimately the value of the Shares
- 44% rewritten
poor risk management or fraud by entities in the digital assets ecosystem;
Expanded competition risk to include any more favorable attributes offered by other blockchain networks.
- 42% rewritten
Risk Factors Related to Digital Assets
Retained historical volatility commentary with no material textual changes.
- 41% rewritten
Potential amendments to the Ethereum network’s protocols and software could, if accepted and authorized by the Ethereum network community, adversely affect an investment in the Trust
Retained core developer protocol amendment risks with no material textual changes.
- 35% rewritten
Prices of ether may be affected due to stablecoins (including Tether and USDC), the activities of stablecoin issuers and their regulatory treatment
- 31% rewritten
Digital assets may have concentrated ownership and large sales or distributions by holders of such digital assets could have an adverse effect on the market price of such digital assets
- 30% rewritten
Although the Ether Custodian is a fiduciary with respect to the Trust’s assets, it could resign or be removed by the Sponsor, which may trigger early dissolution of the Trust
- 27% rewritten
Ether transactions are irrevocable and stolen or incorrectly transferred ether may be irretrievable. As a result, any incorrectly executed ether transactions could adversely affect the value of the Shares
- 26% rewritten
trading activity on digital asset platforms, which, in many cases, is largely unregulated or may be subject to manipulation;
Was: trading activity on digital asset platforms, which, in many cases, are largely unregulated or may be subject to manipulation;
- 23% rewritten
The Index has a limited performance history, the Index price could fail to track the global ether price, and a failure of the Index price could adversely affect the value of the Shares
- 22% rewritten
Any name change and any associated rebranding initiative by the core developers of ether may not be favorably received by the digital asset community, which could negatively impact the value of ether and the value of the Shares
- 22% rewritten
The acceptance of software patches or upgrades by some, but not all, nodes, users and validators in a digital asset network, such as the Ethereum network, could result in a “fork” in such network’s blockchain, including the Ethereum blockchain, resulting in the operation of multiple separate networks
- 22% rewritten
Validators may suffer losses due to staking, or staking may prove unattractive to validators, which could make the Ethereum network less attractive
- 21% rewritten
Competition from the emergence or growth of other digital assets or methods of investing in ether could have a negative impact on the price of ether and adversely affect the value of the Shares
All 81 risk factors
Headings as the filing states them, in filing order.
Other
- 01Risk Factors Related to Digital Assets42% rewritten
- 02The acceptance of software patches or upgrades by some, but not all, nodes, users and validators in a digital asset network, such as the Ethereum network, could result in a “fork” in such network’s blockchain, including the Ethereum blockchain, resulting in the operation of multiple separate networks22% rewritten
- 03Digital assets represent a new and rapidly evolving industry, and the value of the Shares depends on the acceptance of ether
- 04Changes in the governance of a digital asset network may not receive sufficient support from users and validators, which may negatively affect that digital asset network’s ability to grow and respond to challenges
- 05Potential amendments to the Ethereum network’s protocols and software could, if accepted and authorized by the Ethereum network community, adversely affect an investment in the Trust41% rewritten
- 06Digital asset networks face significant scaling challenges and efforts to increase the volume and speed of transactions may not be successful
- 07Digital assets may have concentrated ownership and large sales or distributions by holders of such digital assets could have an adverse effect on the market price of such digital assets31% rewritten
- 08Liquid staking applications pose centralization concerns
- 09A temporary or permanent “fork” could adversely affect the value of the Shares
- 10Shareholders will not receive the benefits of any Incidental Rights and any IR Digital Asset, including any forked or airdropped assets
- 11In the event of a hard fork of the Ethereum network, the Sponsor will, if permitted by the terms of the Trust Agreement, use its discretion to determine which network should be considered the appropriate network for the Trust’s purposes, and in doing so may adversely affect the value of the Shares
- 12Any name change and any associated rebranding initiative by the core developers of ether may not be favorably received by the digital asset community, which could negatively impact the value of ether and the value of the Shares22% rewritten
- 13Validators may suffer losses due to staking, or staking may prove unattractive to validators, which could make the Ethereum network less attractive22% rewritten
- 14Proof-of-stake blockchains are a relatively recent innovation and have not been subject to as widespread use or adoption over as long of a period of time as traditional proof-of-work blockchains
- 15Unlike some digital assets, which have a limit on outstanding supply, there is no limit on ether supplyNew
- 16The value of the Shares relates directly to the value of ether, the value of which may be highly volatile and subject to fluctuations due to a number of factors
- 17trading activity on digital asset platforms, which, in many cases, is largely unregulated or may be subject to manipulation;26% rewritten
- 18the liquidity of digital asset markets and any increase or decrease in trading volume or market making on digital asset markets;74% rewritten
- 19poor risk management or fraud by entities in the digital assets ecosystem;44% rewritten
- 20the Trust’s own acquisitions or dispositions of ether, since there is no limit on the number of ether that the Trust may acquire, and the Sponsor is an affiliate of BlackRock, which is a prominent participant in financial markets
- 21Because the Trust holds only ether and cash, an investment in the Trust may be more volatile than an investment in a more broadly diversified portfolio
- 22The Index has a limited performance history, the Index price could fail to track the global ether price, and a failure of the Index price could adversely affect the value of the Shares23% rewritten
- 23The Index price used to calculate the value of the Trust’s ether may be volatile, adversely affecting the value of the Shares
- 24The Index Administrator could experience system failures or errors
- 25Competition from central bank digital currencies (“CBDCs”) and emerging payments initiatives involving financial institutions could adversely affect the value of ether and other digital assets
- 26Prices of ether may be affected due to stablecoins (including Tether and USDC), the activities of stablecoin issuers and their regulatory treatment35% rewritten
- 27Competition from the emergence or growth of other digital assets or methods of investing in ether could have a negative impact on the price of ether and adversely affect the value of the Shares21% rewritten
- 28Digital asset treasury companies riskNew
- 29Operational cost may exceed the award for validating transaction, and increased transaction fees may adversely affect the usage of the Ethereum networkNew
- 30If regulators or public utilities take actions that restrict or otherwise impact mining activities, such actions could result in decreased security of a digital asset network, including the Ethereum network, which could adversely affect the value of the SharesNew
- 31Additionally, miners on proof-of-work networks may be forced to cease operations during an electricity shortage or power outage, or if electricity prices increase where the mining activities are performedNew
- 32The Trust may be negatively impacted by the effects of the spread of illnesses or other public health emergencies on the global economy and the markets and service providers relevant to the performance of the Trust
- 33The amount of the Trust’s assets represented by each Share will decline over time as the Trust pays the Sponsor’s Fee and additional expenses born by the Trust, and as a result, the value of the Shares may decrease over time
- 34The Trust is a passive investment vehicle that does not seek to generate returns beyond tracking the price of ether. The Trust is not actively managed and will be affected by a general decline in the price of ether
- 35An investment in the Shares deviates from a direct investment in ether
- 36The Trust is not permitted to engage in Staking Activities, which could negatively affect the value of the Shares
- 37The value of the Shares may be influenced by a variety of factors unrelated to the value of ether
- 38The liquidity of the Shares may also be affected by the withdrawal from participation of Authorized Participants or Ether Trading Counterparties
- 39The Trust is an “emerging growth company” and it cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make the Shares less attractive to investors
- 40exemption from any rules requiring mandatory audit firm rotation and auditor discussion and analysis and, unless otherwise determined by the SEC, any new audit rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
- 41The lack of an active trading market for the Shares may result in losses on your investment at the time of disposition of your Shares
- 42The limited ability to facilitate in-kind creations and redemptions of Shares could have adverse consequences for the Trust83% rewritten
- 43Any of these factors could adversely affect the performance of the Trust and the value of the SharesNew
- 44As an owner of Shares, you will not have the rights normally associated with ownership of other types of shares
- 45The Sponsor and the Trustee may agree to amend the Trust Agreement without the consent of the Shareholders
- 46Shareholders do not have the protections associated with ownership of shares in an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act or the protections afforded by the CEA
- 47The Trust is not a registered investment company under the Investment Company Act, and the Sponsor believes that the Trust is not required to register under such act. Consequently, Shareholders do not have the regulatory protections provided to investors in investment companies68% rewritten
- 48As the Sponsor and its management have limited history of operating investment vehicles like the Trust, their experience may be inadequate or unsuitable to manage the Trust
- 49Security threats to the Trust’s account at the Ether Custodian could result in the halting of Trust operations and a loss of Trust assets or damage to the reputation of the Trust, each of which could result in a reduction in the value of the Shares
- 50Ether transactions are irrevocable and stolen or incorrectly transferred ether may be irretrievable. As a result, any incorrectly executed ether transactions could adversely affect the value of the Shares27% rewritten
- 51If the Trade Credits are not available or become exhausted, the Trust may face delays in buying or selling ether that may adversely impact Shareholders; if the Trust does not repay the Trade Credits on time, its assets may be liquidated by the Trade Credit Lender and its affiliates
- 52Loss of a critical banking relationship for, or the failure of a bank used by, the Prime Execution Agent could adversely impact the Trust’s ability to create or redeem Baskets, or could cause losses to the Trust
- 53The Prime Execution Agent routes orders through Connected Trading Venues in connection with trading services under the Prime Execution Agent Agreement. The loss or failure of any such Connected Trading Venues may adversely affect the Prime Execution Agent’s business and cause losses for the Trust
- 54The Trust may be required, or the Sponsor may deem it appropriate, to terminate and liquidate at a time that is disadvantageous to Shareholders
- 55The Trust Agreement includes provisions that limit Shareholders’ voting rights and restrict Shareholders’ right to bring a derivative action
- 56The Sponsor is solely responsible for determining the value of the net asset value of the Trust and NAV, and any errors, discontinuance or changes in such valuation calculations may have an adverse effect on the value of the Shares
- 57Extraordinary expenses resulting from unanticipated events may become payable by the Trust, adversely affecting the value of the Shares
- 58The Trust’s delivery or sale of ether to pay expenses or other operations of the Trust could result in Shareholders incurring tax liability without an associated distribution from the Trust
- 59The value of the Shares will be adversely affected if the Trust is required to indemnify the Sponsor, the Trustee, the Delaware Trustee, the Trust Administrator, the Ether Custodian or the Cash Custodian under the Trust Documents
- 60Intellectual property rights claims may adversely affect the Trust and the value of the Shares
- 61The Shares may trade at a price that is at, above or below the Trust’s NAV as a result of the non-current trading hours between NASDAQ and the digital asset marketNew
- 62Risk Factors Related to the Regulation of the Trust and the Shares
- 63A determination that ether or any other digital asset is a “security” may adversely affect the value of ether and the value of the Shares, and result in potentially extraordinary, nonrecurring expenses to, or termination of, the Trust
- 64Competing industries may have more influence with policymakers than the digital asset industry, which could lead to the adoption of laws and regulations that are harmful to the digital asset industry
- 65Regulatory changes or actions in foreign jurisdictions may affect the value of the Shares or restrict the use of one or more digital assets, validating activity or the operation of their networks or the digital asset platform market in a manner that adversely affects the value of the Shares
- 66Anonymity and illicit financing risk
- 67Regulatory changes or interpretations could obligate the Trust, the Trustee or the Sponsor to register and comply with new regulations, resulting in potentially extraordinary, nonrecurring expenses to the Trust
- 68The treatment of the Trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes is uncertain
- 69The treatment of digital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes is uncertain
- 70Future developments regarding the treatment of digital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes could adversely affect the value of the Shares
- 71Future developments in the treatment of digital currency for tax purposes other than U.S. federal income tax purposes could adversely affect the value of the Shares
- 72A U.S. Tax-Exempt Shareholder may recognize “unrelated business taxable income” as a consequence of an investment in Shares
- 73Shareholders could incur a tax liability without an associated distribution of the Trust
- 74A hard “fork” of the Ethereum blockchain could result in Shareholders incurring a tax liability
- 75Risk Factors Related to Potential Conflicts of Interest
- 76Investment vehicles advised or managed by affiliates of the Sponsor hold a minority interest in Coinbase Global, the parent of Coinbase Inc., which serves as the Trust’s Prime Execution Agent and operates one of the digital asset platforms included in the Index price and is the parent of the Ether Custodian
- 77Shareholders cannot be assured that the Sponsor will be willing or able to continue to serve as sponsor to the Trust for any length of time. If the Sponsor discontinues its activities on behalf of the Trust and a substitute sponsor is not appointed, the Trust will terminate and liquidate its ether
- 78Although the Ether Custodian is a fiduciary with respect to the Trust’s assets, it could resign or be removed by the Sponsor, which may trigger early dissolution of the Trust30% rewritten
- 79Coinbase serves as the ether custodian and the prime execution agent for several competing exchange-traded Ethereum products, which could adversely affect the Trust’s operations and ultimately the value of the Shares51% rewritten
- 80Shareholders may be adversely affected by the lack of independent advisers representing investors in the Trust
- 81There is no guarantee that every employee, officer, director, or similar person associated with the Sponsor, Trustee, or the BlackRock Affiliates will comply with the Policies, duties and training and refrain from engaging in insider trading in violation of their duties to the Trust and Sponsor62% rewritten
Other iShares Ethereum Trust ETF 10-Ks
- FY2024 10-K risk factors76 risks
The Trust holds only ether and cash, exposing investors to extreme volatility and lack of diversification in digital assets. The Trust is passively managed, cannot engage in staking, and suffers a declining asset value per share from the Sponsor Fee. Trading and index risks, regulatory uncertainties, and lack of in-kind creation and redemption further threaten share value.
Filed Mar 05, 2025
About this page
The headings are the filing's own. The one-line readings and the overview are automated and can be wrong: read Item 1A of the 10-K for the exact wording.