Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI) risk factors, FY2025 10-K

Grayscale Sui Staking ETF's FY2025 10-K, filed Mar 24, 2026, lists 91 risk factors. There is no earlier 10-K to compare against, so the most company-specific risks are listed below.

Risk factors listed
910 groups
Section length
38k wordsItem 1A

Grayscale Sui Staking ETF's biggest risks in the FY2025 10-K

  • This filing reflects Grayscale Sui Staking ETF's first year, with risk factors heavily dominated by SUI digital asset volatility, Sui network protocol mechanics, and regulatory uncertainties.

The risks most specific to Grayscale Sui Staking ETF

  • Risk Factors Related to Digital Assets

    The trading prices of SUI have experienced extreme volatility, which could cause the Shares to lose all or substantially all of their value.

  • Digital asset networks and related protocols are dependent upon the internet. A disruption of the internet or a digital asset network or related protocol, such as the Sui Network, would affect the ability to transfer digital assets, including SUI, and, consequently, their value

    Disruptions of the internet or the Sui Network would affect the ability to transfer SUI and negatively impact its value.

  • The Sui protocol was only recently conceived, and the Sui Network or its underlying technologies may not function as intended, which could have an adverse impact on the value of SUI and an investment in the Shares

    The Sui protocol was only recently conceived, and the network or its underlying technologies may not function as intended.

  • Digital assets may have concentrated ownership and large sales or distributions by holders of such digital assets, or any ability to participate in or otherwise influence a digital asset’s underlying network, could have an adverse effect on the market price of such digital asset

    As of December 31, 2025, the largest 100 SUI wallets held approximately 16% of the SUI in circulation, creating concentrated ownership risks.

  • “33% attack” where, if a validator or group of validators were to gain control of more than 33% of the total staked SUI on the Sui Network, a malicious actor could temporarily impede or delay block confirmation or even cause a temporary fork in the blockchain

    A malicious actor gaining over 33% or 50% of staked SUI could impede block confirmation, fork the chain, or manipulate transactions.

  • NYAG to resolve the NYAG’s allegations against the Genesis Entities, which settlement was subsequently approved by the Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York

    DCG agreed to a $38 million civil money penalty arising from SEC allegations regarding Genesis Capital default statements.

  • Competition from the emergence or growth of other digital assets could have a negative impact on the price of SUI and adversely affect the value of the Shares

    As of December 31, 2025, SUI was the twenty-third largest digital asset by market capitalization, with a market cap of approximately $5.2 billion.

  • Any suspension or other unavailability of the Trust’s redemption program may cause the Shares to trade at a discount to the NAV per Share

    Prior to uplisting to NYSE Arca, the Shares traded on OTCQB at substantial premiums and discounts to the NAV per Share.

All 91 risk factors

Headings as the filing states them, in filing order.

Other

  1. 01Risk Factors Related to Digital Assets
  2. 02Digital assets such as SUI were only introduced within the past two decades, and the medium-to-long term value of the Shares is subject to a number of factors relating to the capabilities and development of blockchain technologies and to the fundamental investment characteristics of digital assets
  3. 03Digital asset networks and related protocols are dependent upon the internet. A disruption of the internet or a digital asset network or related protocol, such as the Sui Network, would affect the ability to transfer digital assets, including SUI, and, consequently, their value
  4. 04Many digital asset networks face significant scaling challenges and are being upgraded with various features to increase the speed and throughput of digital asset transactions. These attempts to increase the volume of transactions may not be effective
  5. 05Digital assets represent a relatively new and rapidly evolving industry, and the value of the Shares depends on the acceptance of SUI
  6. 06The Sui protocol was only recently conceived, and the Sui Network or its underlying technologies may not function as intended, which could have an adverse impact on the value of SUI and an investment in the Shares
  7. 07Smart contracts are a new technology and ongoing development may magnify initial problems, cause volatility on the networks that use smart contracts and reduce interest in them, which could have an adverse impact on the value of SUI
  8. 08Changes in the governance of a digital asset network or protocol may not receive sufficient support from users and validators, which may negatively affect that digital asset network’s or protocol’s ability to grow and respond to challenges
  9. 09Digital asset networks face significant scaling challenges and efforts to increase the volume and speed of transactions may not be successful
  10. 10Digital asset networks are developed by a diverse set of contributors and the perception that certain high-profile contributors will no longer contribute to the network could have an adverse effect on the market price of the related digital asset
  11. 11Digital assets may have concentrated ownership and large sales or distributions by holders of such digital assets, or any ability to participate in or otherwise influence a digital asset’s underlying network, could have an adverse effect on the market price of such digital asset
  12. 12Validators may suffer losses due to Staking, or Staking may prove unattractive to validators, which could adversely affect the Sui Network
  13. 13Proof-of-stake blockchains are a relatively recent innovation, and have not been subject to as widespread use or adoption over as long of a period of time as traditional proof-of-work blockchains
  14. 14“33% attack” where, if a validator or group of validators were to gain control of more than 33% of the total staked SUI on the Sui Network, a malicious actor could temporarily impede or delay block confirmation or even cause a temporary fork in the blockchain
  15. 15If validators exit the Sui Network, it could increase the likelihood of a malicious actor obtaining control
  16. 16A temporary or permanent “fork” or a “clone” could adversely affect the value of the Shares
  17. 17In the event of a hard fork of the Sui Network, the Sponsor will, if permitted by the terms of the Trust Agreement, use its discretion to determine which network should be considered the appropriate network for the Trust’s purposes, and in doing so may adversely affect the value of the Shares
  18. 18In the event of a hard fork of the Sui Network, the Custodian’s operations may be interrupted or subject to additional security risks that could disrupt the Trust’s ability to process creations and redemptions of Shares or otherwise threaten the security of the Trust’s SUI holdings
  19. 19Any name change and any associated rebranding initiative by the core developers of SUI may not be favorably received by the digital asset community, which could negatively impact the value of SUI and the value of the Shares
  20. 20If the Sui Network is used to facilitate illicit activities, businesses that facilitate transactions in SUI could be at increased risk of criminal or civil lawsuits, or of having services cut off, which could negatively affect the price of SUI and the value of the Shares
  21. 21In accordance with its regulatory obligations, the Authorized Participant, or the Liquidity Provider, conducts customer due diligence and enhanced due diligence on its counterparties, which enables it to determine each counterparty’s AML and other risks and assign an appropriate risk rating
  22. 22Recent developments in the digital asset economy have led to extreme volatility and disruption in digital asset markets, a loss of confidence in participants of the digital asset ecosystem, significant negative publicity surrounding digital assets broadly and market-wide declines in liquidity
  23. 23NYAG to resolve the NYAG’s allegations against the Genesis Entities, which settlement was subsequently approved by the Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York
  24. 24The value of the Shares relates directly to the value of SUI, the value of which may be highly volatile and subject to fluctuations due to a number of factors
  25. 25In addition, there is no assurance that SUI will maintain its value in the long or intermediate term. In the event that the price of SUI declines, the Sponsor expects the value of the Shares to decline proportionately
  26. 26Digital Asset Trading Platforms may be exposed to front-running
  27. 27Digital Asset Trading Platforms may be exposed to wash-trading
  28. 28The Index has a limited history and a failure of the Index Price could adversely affect the value of the Shares
  29. 29The Index Price used to calculate the value of the Trust’s SUI may be volatile, and purchasing and selling activity in the Digital Asset Markets associated with Basket creations and redemptions may affect the Index Price and Share trading prices, adversely affecting the value of the Shares
  30. 30Competition from the emergence or growth of other digital assets could have a negative impact on the price of SUI and adversely affect the value of the Shares
  31. 31Investors may also invest in SUI through means other than the Shares, including through direct investments in SUI and other financial vehicles, including securities backed by or linked to SUI and digital asset financial vehicles similar to the Trust
  32. 32Congestion or delay on the Sui Network may delay purchases or sales of SUI by the Trust
  33. 33The SEC has approved generic listing standards for commodity-based trust shares and may approve other applications under Rule 19b-4 of the Exchange Act to list competing digital assets as exchange-traded products, which could reduce demand for, and the price of, SUI and adversely impact the value of the Shares
  34. 34Competition from central bank digital currencies (“CBDCs”) and emerging payments initiatives involving financial institutions could adversely affect the price of SUI and other digital assets
  35. 35Prices of SUI may be affected due to stablecoins (including Tether and USDC), the activities of stablecoin issuers and their regulatory treatment
  36. 36The Trust relies on third-party service providers to perform certain functions essential to the affairs of the Trust and the replacement of such service providers could pose challenges to the safekeeping of the Trust’s SUI and to the operations of the Trust
  37. 37on the proposal. However, there can be no assurance that the Custodian would continue to qualify as a “qualified custodian” under a final rule that may be proposed or adopted by the SEC in the future
  38. 38The liquidity of the Shares may be affected if Authorized Participants cease to perform their obligations under the Participant Agreements or the Liquidity Engager is unable to engage Liquidity Providers
  39. 39The Shares may trade at a price that is at, above or below the Trust’s NAV per Share as a result of the non-concurrent trading hours between NYSE Arca and the Digital Asset Trading Platform Market
  40. 40Any suspension or other unavailability of the Trust’s redemption program may cause the Shares to trade at a discount to the NAV per Share
  41. 41Shareholders may suffer a loss on their investment if the Shares trade above or below the Trust’s NAV per Share
  42. 42The amount of the Trust’s assets represented by each Share will decline over time as the Trust pays the Sponsor’s Fee and Additional Trust Expenses, and as a result, the value of the Shares may decrease over time
  43. 43The value of the Shares may be influenced by a variety of factors unrelated to the value of SUI
  44. 44Shareholders do not have the protections associated with ownership of shares in an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act or the protections afforded by the CEA
  45. 45The Trust is not a registered investment company under the Investment Company Act, and the Sponsor believes that the Trust is not required to register under such act. Consequently, shareholders do not have the regulatory protections provided to investors in investment companies
  46. 46There is no guarantee that an active trading market for the Shares will continue to develop
  47. 47As the Sponsor and its management have limited history of operating investment vehicles like the Trust, their experience may be inadequate or unsuitable to manage the Trust
  48. 48Security threats to the Trust’s Vault Balance or Settlement Balance could result in the halting of Trust operations, including the creation and redemption of Baskets, and a loss of Trust assets or damage to the reputation of the Trust, each of which could result in a reduction in the value of the Shares
  49. 49SUI transactions are irrevocable and stolen or incorrectly transferred SUI may be irretrievable. As a result, any incorrectly executed SUI transactions could adversely affect the value of the Shares
  50. 50The lack of full insurance and shareholders’ limited rights of legal recourse against the Trust, Trustee, Sponsor, Transfer Agent and Custodial Entities expose the Trust and its shareholders to the risk of loss of the Trust’s SUI for which no person or entity is liable
  51. 51The Trust may be required, or the Sponsor may deem it appropriate, to terminate and liquidate at a time that is disadvantageous to shareholders
  52. 52The Trust Agreement includes provisions that limit shareholders’ voting rights and restrict shareholders’ right to bring a derivative action
  53. 53The Sponsor is solely responsible for determining the value of the NAV and NAV per Share and any errors, discontinuance or changes in such valuation calculations may have an adverse effect on the value of the Shares
  54. 54Extraordinary expenses resulting from unanticipated events may become payable by the Trust, adversely affecting the value of the Shares
  55. 55The Trust’s delivery or sale of SUI to pay expenses or other operations of the Trust could result in shareholders’ incurring tax liability without an associated distribution from the Trust
  56. 56The value of the Shares will be adversely affected if the Trust is required to indemnify the Sponsor, the Trustee, the Transfer Agent or the Custodian under the Trust Documents
  57. 57Intellectual property rights claims may adversely affect the Trust and the value of the Shares
  58. 58Pandemics, epidemics and other natural and man-made disasters could negatively impact the value of the Trust’s holdings and/or significantly disrupt its affairs
  59. 59The limited ability to facilitate in-kind creations and redemptions of Shares could have adverse consequences for the Trust
  60. 60Shareholders will not receive the benefits of any forks or airdrops
  61. 61With respect to any fork, airdrop or similar event, the Sponsor will cause the Trust to irrevocably abandon the Incidental Rights and any IR Virtual Currency associated with such event. As such, shareholders will not receive the benefits of any forks, and the Trust is not able to participate in any airdrop
  62. 62Coinbase Global serves as the SUI custodian and prime execution agent for several competing exchange-traded SUI products, which could adversely affect the Trust’s operations and ultimately the value of the Shares
  63. 63Certain of the Authorized Participants engaged by the Trust may serve in a similar capacity for competing exchange-traded SUI products, which could adversely affect the arbitrage mechanism, the Trust’s operations, the performance of the Trust and ultimately the value of the Shares
  64. 64Shareholders that are not Authorized Participants may only purchase or sell their Shares in secondary trading markets, and the conditions associated with trading in secondary markets may adversely affect investors’ investment in the Shares
  65. 65A single shareholder controls over a majority of the Shares representing ownership in the Trust, which could limit the ability of other shareholders to exercise voting influence or otherwise adversely impact the value of the Shares
  66. 66A determination that SUI or any other digital asset is or involves a transaction in a “security” may adversely affect the value of SUI and the value of the Shares, and result in potentially extraordinary, nonrecurring expenses to, or termination of, the Trust
  67. 67SUI’s initial manner of sale closely resembles that of certain digital assets found to be securities, and a determination that SUI is a “security” may adversely affect the value of SUI and an investment in the Shares, and result in potentially extraordinary, nonrecurring expenses to, or termination of, the Trust
  68. 68Competing industries may have more influence with policymakers than the digital asset industry, which could lead to the adoption of laws and regulations that are harmful to the digital asset industry
  69. 69Regulatory changes or other events in foreign jurisdictions may affect the value of the Shares or restrict the use of one or more digital assets, validating activity or the operation of their networks or the Digital Asset Trading Platform Market in a manner that adversely affects the value of the Shares
  70. 70validating, it would have a material adverse effect on digital asset networks (including the Sui Network), the Digital Asset Market, and as a result, impact the value of the Shares
  71. 71If regulators subject an Authorized Participant, the Trust or the Sponsor to regulation as a money service business or money transmitter, this could result in extraordinary expenses to the Authorized Participant, the Trust or the Sponsor and also result in decreased liquidity for the Shares
  72. 72Statutory or regulatory changes or interpretations could obligate the Trust or the Sponsor to register and comply with new regulations, resulting in potentially extraordinary, nonrecurring expenses to the Trust
  73. 73The treatment of the Trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes is uncertain
  74. 74The treatment of digital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes is uncertain
  75. 75Future developments regarding the treatment of digital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes could adversely affect the value of the Shares
  76. 76Future developments in the treatment of digital assets for tax purposes other than U.S. federal income tax purposes could adversely affect the value of the Shares
  77. 77The tax treatment of SUI and transactions involving SUI for state and local tax purposes is not settled
  78. 78A U.S. tax-exempt shareholder may recognize “unrelated business taxable income” as a consequence of an investment in Shares
  79. 79Shareholders may be subject to withholding tax on Staking Consideration received as staking rewards and income derived from forks, airdrops and similar occurrences
  80. 80Risk Factors Related to Potential Conflicts of Interest
  81. 81DCG is a minority interest holder in Kraken, which operates one of the Digital Asset Trading Platforms included in the Index Price
  82. 82Shareholders cannot be assured that the Sponsor will be willing or able to continue to serve as sponsor to the Trust for any length of time. If the Sponsor discontinues its activities on behalf of the Trust and a substitute sponsor is not appointed, the Trust will terminate and liquidate its SUI
  83. 83Although the Custodian is a fiduciary with respect to the Trust’s assets, if the Custodian resigns or is removed by the Sponsor or otherwise, without replacement, it would trigger early termination of the Trust
  84. 84Shareholders may be adversely affected by the lack of independent advisers representing investors in the Trust
  85. 85The Trust is an “emerging growth company” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make the Shares less attractive to investors
  86. 86Risk Factors Related to Staking
  87. 87Staking introduces a risk of loss of SUI. None of the Trust’s assets, including potentially staked assets, are subject to the protections enjoyed by depositors or customers of institutions with FDIC or Securities Investor Protection Corporation membership
  88. 88Staked SUI tokens will be inaccessible for a variable period of time, determined by a range of factors, which could result in certain liquidity risk to the Trust
  89. 89The Trust will be dependent on third parties or intermediary technical systems to effectively execute the Trust’s Staking Arrangements
  90. 90The regulatory landscape surrounding Staking is uncertain
  91. 91Beneficial owners of Shares could incur tax liabilities without receiving corresponding distributions from the Trust

About this page

The headings are the filing's own. The one-line readings and the overview are automated and can be wrong: read Item 1A of the 10-K for the exact wording.