CMS Energy (CMS) risk factors, FY2025 10-K

CMS Energy's FY2025 10-K, filed Feb 10, 2026, lists 33 risk factors in 2 groups. Against the prior year's 34: 1 new, 2 dropped, 9 substantially reworded.

Risk factors listed
332 groups
New this year
1vs 34 last year
Dropped
2since the prior 10-K
Substantially reworded
9of those kept
Section length
7k wordsItem 1A

What the changes say

  • Capital market volatility and credit disruptions are newly highlighted risks for CMS Energy and its counterparties this year.

What changed since the prior 10-K

New

  • NewBusiness/Operations Risks

    as contractual obligations by third parties to purchase utility services, perform work, supply equipment, provide services, and meet related specifications or requirements), could have a material adverse effect on CMS Energy and Consumers

    Volatility and disruptions in capital and credit markets can cause lenders, vendors, and contractors to fail to meet their contractual obligations.

Dropped

  • DroppedIndustry/Regulatory Risks

    of the associated capital investments. Consumers’ ability to implement its plan may be affected by global supply chain disruptions and/or workforce availability

  • DroppedBusiness/Operations Risks

    CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ risk or that they will not result in net liabilities to CMS Energy or Consumers as a result of future volatility

Reworded

  • 80% rewrittenBusiness/Operations Risks

    Energy risk management strategies might not be effective in managing fuel and electricity pricing risks, which could result in unanticipated liabilities to CMS Energy and Consumers or increased volatility in their earnings

    Added language noting that commodity risk management strategies might result in net liabilities from future volatility.

  • 75% rewrittenBusiness/Operations Risks

    A work interruption or other union actions could adversely affect CMS Energy and Consumers

    Updated union expiration dates to 2030 for Consumers and 2029 for NorthStar Clean Energy, and updated represented employee percentages to 45 percent and 22 percent respectively.

    Was: A work interruption or other union actions could adversely affect Consumers

  • 58% rewrittenIndustry/Regulatory Risks

    Changes to ROA could have a material adverse effect on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ businesses

    Truncated the discussion on alternative electric suppliers and community solar programs by removing the final warning sentence.

  • 49% rewrittenBusiness/Operations Risks

    Demand for electricity associated with data center expansion could have a material effect on CMS Energy and Consumers

    Changed wording regarding data center power demand from 'may not develop as planned' to 'may not develop as anticipated'.

  • 45% rewrittenBusiness/Operations Risks

    CMS Energy and Consumers are exposed to counterparty risk

    Shortened the counterparty risk description by truncating the final sentence regarding contractual obligations.

  • 42% rewrittenIndustry/Regulatory Risks

    Changes in taxation as well as the inherent difficulty in quantifying potential tax effects of business decisions could negatively impact CMS Energy and Consumers

    Added a specific mention that President Trump signed the OBBBA into law in July 2025.

  • 36% rewrittenIndustry/Regulatory Risks

    CMS Energy and Consumers have announced ambitious plans to reduce their impact on climate change and increase the reliability of their electric distribution system. Achieving these plans depends on numerous factors, many of which are outside of their control

    Removed the specific reference to ending the use of coal in owned generation in 2025.

  • 31% rewrittenIndustry/Regulatory Risks

    CMS Energy and Consumers are subject to rate regulation, which could have a material adverse effect on financial results

    Maintained the core rate regulation risks under MPSC without substantive text changes.

  • 21% rewrittenIndustry/Regulatory Risks

    CMS Energy and Consumers could incur substantial costs to comply with environmental requirements

All 33 risk factors

Headings as the filing states them, in filing order.

Other

  1. 01CMS Energy depends on dividends from its subsidiaries to meet its debt service obligations
  2. 02Due to its holding company structure, CMS Energy depends on dividends from its subsidiaries to meet its debt service and other payment obligations. If sufficient dividends were not paid to CMS Energy by its subsidiaries, CMS Energy might not be able to generate the funds necessary to fulfill its payment obligations
  3. 03CMS Energy has indebtedness that could limit its financial flexibility and its ability to meet its debt service obligations
  4. 04CMS Energy and Consumers rely on the capital markets, as well as on bank syndications, to meet their financial commitments and short-term liquidity needs not otherwise funded internally
  5. 05Market performance and other changes could decrease the value of employee benefit plan assets, which then could require substantial funding

Industry/Regulatory Risks

  1. 06Changes to ROA could have a material adverse effect on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ businesses58% rewritten
  2. 07The creation of utilities by municipalities in Consumers’ service territory, or the impairment of Consumers’ franchise rights to serve customers in municipalities, could have a material adverse effect on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ businesses
  3. 08Distributed energy resources could have a material adverse effect on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ businesses
  4. 09CMS Energy and Consumers are subject to rate regulation, which could have a material adverse effect on financial results31% rewritten
  5. 10Utility regulation, state or federal legislation, regulation, and compliance could have a material adverse effect on CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ businesses
  6. 11CMS Energy and Consumers have announced ambitious plans to reduce their impact on climate change and increase the reliability of their electric distribution system. Achieving these plans depends on numerous factors, many of which are outside of their control36% rewritten
  7. 12Changes in taxation as well as the inherent difficulty in quantifying potential tax effects of business decisions could negatively impact CMS Energy and Consumers42% rewritten
  8. 13CMS Energy and its subsidiaries, including Consumers, must comply with the Dodd-Frank Act and its related regulations
  9. 14CMS Energy and Consumers could incur substantial costs to comply with environmental requirements21% rewritten
  10. 15CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ businesses could be affected adversely by any delay in meeting environmental requirements
  11. 16CMS Energy and Consumers expect to incur additional substantial costs related to environmental remediation of former sites

Business/Operations Risks

  1. 17There are risks associated with Consumers’ substantial capital investment program planned for the next five years
  2. 18CMS Energy and Consumers could be affected adversely by legacy litigation and retained liabilities
  3. 19Consumers is exposed to risks related to general economic conditions in its service territories
  4. 20Technology advances, government incentives and subsidies, and regulatory decisions could increase the cost effectiveness of customer-owned methods of producing electricity and managing energy use resulting in reduced load, cross subsidization, and increased costs
  5. 21CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ energy sales and operations are affected by seasonal factors and varying weather conditions from year to year
  6. 22Demand for electricity associated with data center expansion could have a material effect on CMS Energy and Consumers49% rewritten
  7. 23CMS Energy and Consumers are subject to information security risks, risks of unauthorized access to their systems, and technology failures
  8. 24CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ businesses have liability risks
  9. 25CMS Energy and Consumers are subject to risks that are beyond their control, including but not limited to natural disasters, civil unrest, terrorist attacks and related acts of war, cyber incidents, vandalism, and other catastrophic events
  10. 26Energy risk management strategies might not be effective in managing fuel and electricity pricing risks, which could result in unanticipated liabilities to CMS Energy and Consumers or increased volatility in their earnings80% rewritten
  11. 27CMS Energy and Consumers might not be able to obtain an adequate supply of natural gas or coal, which could limit their ability to operate electric generation facilities or serve Consumers’ natural gas customers
  12. 28Unplanned outages or maintenance could be costly for CMS Energy or Consumers
  13. 29CMS Energy and Consumers are exposed to counterparty risk45% rewritten
  14. 30as contractual obligations by third parties to purchase utility services, perform work, supply equipment, provide services, and meet related specifications or requirements), could have a material adverse effect on CMS Energy and ConsumersNew
  15. 31CMS Energy and Consumers are exposed to significant reputational risks
  16. 32A work interruption or other union actions could adversely affect CMS Energy and Consumers75% rewritten
  17. 33Failure to attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce could adversely impact CMS Energy’s and Consumers’ results of operations

Other CMS Energy 10-Ks

  • FY2024 10-K risk factors
    34 risks

    Consumers faces strict regulatory oversight, rate caps, and environmental mandates impacting its capital plans and generation assets.

    Filed Feb 11, 2025

About this page

The headings are the filing's own. The one-line readings and the overview are automated and can be wrong: read Item 1A of the 10-K for the exact wording.