Hyperscale Data (GPUS) risk factors, FY2025 10-K

Hyperscale Data's FY2025 10-K, filed Apr 15, 2026, lists 206 risk factors in 32 groups. Against the prior year's 97: 120 new, 11 dropped, 19 substantially reworded.

Risk factors listed
20632 groups
New this year
120vs 97 last year
Dropped
11since the prior 10-K
Substantially reworded
19of those kept
Section length
55k wordsItem 1A

What the changes say

  • The company faces significant new risks from its Bitcoin treasury strategy and its Omnipresent robotics subsidiary.
  • Regulatory scrutiny increases across Bitcoin holdings, CFTC compliance, and international tariffs on TurnOnGreen.
  • BNC platform operations shifted focus from social gaming sweepstakes to predictions markets.

What changed since the prior 10-K

New

  • NewRisks Related to Our Bitcoin Strategy and Holdings

    Our Bitcoin strategy exposes us to various risks, including risks associated with Bitcoin

    Our Bitcoin digital asset treasury strategy exposes us to volatility risks, as Bitcoin traded between $61,000 and $126,000 and does not pay interest.

  • NewRisks Related to Our Bitcoin Strategy and Holdings

    Our Bitcoin strategy subjects us to enhanced regulatory oversight

    Our Bitcoin strategy may attract regulatory scrutiny from the SEC or other agencies regarding digital asset use in illegal or sanctioned activities.

  • NewRisks Related to Our Bitcoin Strategy and Holdings

    The concentration of our Bitcoin holdings enhances the risks inherent in our Bitcoin strategy

    We held approximately 525 Bitcoins as of December 31, 2025, and lack of diversification in our treasury holdings enhances price volatility risks.

  • NewRisks Related to Our Bitcoin Strategy and Holdings

    The emergence or growth of other digital assets, including those with significant private or public sector backing, could have a negative impact on the price of Bitcoin and adversely affect our business

    Emergence of alternative digital assets using proof-of-stake, like Ethereum, could reduce Bitcoin market share and negatively impact our financial condition.

  • NewRisks Related to Our Bitcoin Operations – Legal and Regulatory

    Current interpretations require the regulation of Bitcoin under the CEA by the CFTC, and we may be required to register and comply with such regulations. Any disruption of our operations in response to the changed regulatory circumstances may be at a time that is disadvantageous to our investors

    We may be required to register under the CEA and comply with CFTC regulations as a commodity pool operator for our Bitcoin holdings.

  • NewRisks Related to Omnipresent

    Omnipresent intends to operate in an emerging industry that is subject to rapid technological change and will experience increasing competition

    Our subsidiary Omnipresent faces competition in cleaning and indoor delivery robotics from established and emerging market players.

  • NewRisks Related to Omnipresent

    Omnipresent’s business plans require a significant amount of capital. Future capital needs may require us to sell additional equity or debt securities that may dilute our stockholders

    Omnipresent is an embryonic-stage robotics business requiring substantial capital and ongoing debt or equity financing before commercialization.

  • NewRisks Related to Omnipresent

    Omnipresent has no experience in operating robots. Unforeseen safety issues with its future products could result in injuries to people which would in turn result in adverse effects on Hyperscale Data’s business and reputation

    Omnipresent has no operating experience with robots, and autonomous collisions in spaces like hotels or hospitals could cause injuries and litigation.

  • NewRisks Related to Omnipresent

    Omnipresent must successfully manage product introductions and transitions in order to become competitive

    Omnipresent must continually develop new robotic solutions and secure production orders from contract manufacturers to remain competitive.

  • NewRisks Related to Omnipresent

    If any of these or other factors becomes problematic, Omnipresent may not be able to develop and introduce new robotic solutions in a timely or cost-effective manner, and its anticipated business may be harmed

    Omnipresent relies on third-party manufacturers and suppliers, which may cause component shortages or delay product commercialization.

  • NewRisks Related to Omnipresent

    Components used in Omnipresent’s future products sensors may fail as a result of manufacturing, design or other defects over which it has no control and render its anticipated devices permanently inoperable

    Manufacturing or design defects in third-party sensor components could render Omnipresent's robotic devices permanently inoperable.

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    All capital that we have invested through Ault Capital in the Ault Blockchain could be lost entirely

    We have committed significant capital through Ault Capital to Ault Blockchain and 500,000 Project Node Licenses, risking total investment loss.

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    We have never built or operated a public blockchain network, and we may be unable to successfully execute a venture of this technical and operational complexity

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    We may lack the internal organizational capacity and management bandwidth required to build and operate a public blockchain network while simultaneously operating our existing businesses

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    A new blockchain network has no established value without participants, and participants may not join a network that does not yet have demonstrated value, a challenge that may prove impossible to overcome

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    No secondary market for AULT Tokens may ever develop, which would make the tokens economically worthless and undermine the economic rationale for purchasing a Node License

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    The Ault Blockchain Mainnet launched in March 2026 and we have no meaningful track record from which investors can evaluate the performance or long-term prospects of this business

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    The node license program is a novel commercial structure with no established market precedent, and the market may not accept it

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    A significant failure in the Ault Blockchain business could harm the reputation and operations of our other business segments, and adverse developments in other segments could in turn harm the Ault Blockchain

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    Ongoing development of the Ault Blockchain requires continued capital investment that may not be available on acceptable terms or at all

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    The Ault Blockchain depends on a small number of individuals with specialized knowledge who are not easily replaced, and the loss of any of them could significantly harm our operations

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    The Ault Blockchain competes against established blockchain networks with substantially greater resources, participation, and proven track records, and may be unable to compete effectively

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    Broad declines or periods of negative sentiment in digital asset markets generally could reduce demand for Node Licenses and adversely affect the Ault Blockchain business regardless of the network’s own performance

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    The long-term strategy for the Ault Blockchain depends on applications that have not been built, and these applications may not be successfully developed or may fail to attract users

  • NewRisks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

    The strategy of building a blockchain network oriented toward tokenized real-world assets depends on legal, custodial, and market infrastructure that does not yet fully exist, and the execution of this strategy may prove more complex and costly than we currently anticipate

  • NewOperational and Financial Risks

    The core software underlying the Ault Blockchain is developed primarily by an outside firm rather than an internal team, creating dependency, lack of knowledge continuity, and transition risks that could materially disrupt the network

  • NewOperational and Financial Risks

    There is currently no available insurance product that would cover losses resulting from a smart contract vulnerability, governance attack, or loss of digital asset private keys, meaning any such loss would be unrecoverable

  • NewOperational and Financial Risks

    Blockchain businesses frequently face difficulty maintaining banking relationships, and the loss of banking access would impair our ability to conduct the fiat currency operations necessary to run the Ault Blockchain business

  • NewOperational and Financial Risks

    Affiliated entities that operate as validators or stake AULT Tokens are subject to a protocol-enforced penalties that can permanently reduce their token holdings, and any such event could result in a material financial loss

  • NewOperational and Financial Risks

    Affiliated entities hold or may hold a majority of all outstanding Node Licenses, concentrating economic interests and potential governance influence within our corporate group

  • NewOperational and Financial Risks

    The Ault DAO governance process may produce decisions that are harmful to our interests or to the long-term health of the network, and we have limited ability to prevent such outcomes

  • NewOperational and Financial Risks

    The on-chain treasury funded by network transaction fees is controlled by governance votes that we cannot override, and those funds may be allocated in ways that do not benefit the network

  • NewOperational and Financial Risks

    The economic arrangements between the Ault Blockchain and our affiliates create potential conflicts of interest that may not be fully aligned with the interests of unaffiliated Node License purchasers

  • NewOperational and Financial Risks

    Our ability to screen Node License purchasers and governance participants depends on third-party identity verification and sanctions screening services, and any failure of those services could impair our compliance operations

  • NewOperational and Financial Risks

    We rely on external vendors and partners for critical functions we cannot fully perform in-house, and the loss of any key relationship could severely disrupt operations

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    If either the AULT Token or the Node Licenses we are selling are determined to be a security under applicable law, we could be required to register token distributions as well as node sales, restructure the network’s economics, or cease operations in their current form

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    The SEC, CFTC, FinCEN, OFAC, or other regulators may take enforcement action against us or the Ault Blockchain in connection with its digital asset activities, and any such action could be materially disruptive

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    The regulatory posture toward digital assets in the United States has shifted materially between presidential administrations and could shift again, creating significant uncertainty for a business built on long-term regulatory assumptions

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    We may be subject to obligations under federal anti-money laundering laws that impose significant compliance costs and operational requirements, and failure to comply could result in material penalties

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    We apply identity verification and sanctions screening at our controlled access points, but the Ault Blockchain is a public network and we cannot prevent all protocol-level interaction by sanctioned persons, which may expose us to regulatory risk

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    The Wyoming decentralized autonomous organization limited liability company statute is a new and largely untested area of law, and courts or regulators in other jurisdictions may not recognize or enforce the protections it provides

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    Before the network reaches a defined stage of operation, Ault DAO LLC retains the unilateral authority to amend the governing Constitution, which means the terms that Node License purchasers agreed to could change after purchase

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    The Ault Blockchain operates across multiple regulatory jurisdictions, and adverse regulatory developments in any major jurisdiction could restrict participant access and impair the network’s global growth

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    Planned applications involving tokenized financial assets may require exchange, alternative trading system, or broker-dealer registration that we do not currently hold, and the absence of such registration could prevent these applications from launching

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    The Ault Blockchain is a public network on which any developer may deploy applications without approval, and harmful or non-compliant applications could expose the network and our company to regulatory scrutiny and reputational harm

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    The accounting and tax treatment of AULT Token distributions received by affiliated entities is uncertain, and adverse determinations could result in unexpected financial and tax liabilities

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    We may be subject to regulatory enforcement proceedings, class action litigation from Node License purchasers, or other legal proceedings that could result in material costs, penalties, and operational disruption

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    Participants who lose access to their Node Licenses or earned tokens due to the loss of their private keys may bring claims against us despite the fact that we have no custody of or access to those assets

  • NewLegal and Regulatory Risks

    The governing Constitution limits member claims against us and requires binding arbitration, but these provisions may not be enforceable in all jurisdictions and may not fully protect us from litigation

  • NewTechnology Risks

    Protocol and smart contract vulnerabilities; the software underlying the Ault Blockchain, may contain bugs or security flaws that could be exploited to cause permanent, unrecoverable harm to the network and its participants

  • NewTechnology Risks

    Theft or compromise of the private keys controlling affiliated entities’ AULT Token holdings could result in the permanent loss of significant digital assets, with no ability to recover them

  • NewTechnology Risks

    Block production on the Ault Blockchain is concentrated among the top 100 validators, and the compromise or coordination of a significant portion of that group could disrupt or manipulate the network

  • NewTechnology Risks

    The verifiable random function system that node operators depend on for their participation in the network could produce compromised outputs if a sufficient number of nodes are coordinated or manipulated, undermining network functions that rely on randomness

  • NewTechnology Risks

    Governance-approved changes to the network’s software may introduce unforeseen technical problems, and disagreements over upgrades could result in the network splitting into additional, incompatible versions

  • NewTechnology Risks

    The Ault Blockchain is built on open-source components that we do not own or fully control, and vulnerabilities or changes introduced by third-party maintainers could affect the security and stability of the network

  • NewTechnology Risks

    The Ault Blockchain’s planned cross-chain connectivity relies on LayerZero, an external cross-chain messaging protocol that we do not own or control, and any failure, vulnerability, or adverse change affecting LayerZero could disrupt the network’s cross-chain functionality

  • NewTechnology Risks

    The Ault Blockchain may not perform as designed under real-world conditions, and performance failures could drive participants and developers to competing networks

  • NewTechnology Risks

    The blockchain technology underlying the Ault Blockchain is evolving rapidly, and the network’s current architecture could become technically outdated relative to newer networks, reducing its competitiveness

  • NewRisks Related to RiskOn International and BitNile.com - General

    BNC has no operating history in the predictions market industry, and its prior sweepstakes gaming operations are not indicative of future performance in its new business

  • NewRisks Related to RiskOn International and BitNile.com - General

    The Platform is currently in alpha testing and is not yet commercially available, and BNC may face significant delays or obstacles in completing development and launching to a broader user base

  • NewRisks Related to RiskOn International and BitNile.com - General

    The Platform’s availability is restricted to permitted jurisdictions, which significantly limits BNC’s addressable market and may constrain revenue growth

  • NewRisks Related to RiskOn International and BitNile.com - General

    Predictions markets require sufficient two-sided market liquidity to function effectively, and BNC may be unable to attract and maintain the user base necessary to support a viable marketplace

  • NewRisks Related to RiskOn International and BitNile.com - General

    BNC faces competition from well-capitalized and, in certain cases, already-regulated predictions market platforms, and the competitive landscape is expanding rapidly

  • NewRisks Related to RiskOn International and BitNile.com - General

    BNC’s Platform depends on third-party data providers to supply verified real-world event outcomes for settlement purposes, and disruptions in those services could impair the Platform’s ability to settle markets accurately and on time

  • NewRisks Related to RiskOn International and BitNile.com - General

    BNC’s ability to grow its user base and generate revenue depends on its ability to attract and retain users in a market where user switching costs are low and competing platforms are readily accessible

  • NewRisks Related to RiskOn International and BitNile.com - General

    BNC’s ability to access payment processing services and maintain banking relationships may be constrained by the regulatory uncertainty surrounding the predictions market industry

  • NewRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    The predictions market industry is subject to complex and evolving federal and state regulation, and BNC may be required to obtain regulatory authorizations it has not yet obtained before it can operate commercially in certain jurisdictions

  • NewRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    The CFTC has broad authority over event contracts, and regulatory action by the CFTC could require BNC to restructure or discontinue certain aspects of its business

  • NewRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    The question of whether federal regulation of predictions market platforms preempts state gambling and gaming laws is actively contested in courts across multiple jurisdictions, and an adverse outcome could materially restrict BNC’s operations

  • NewRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    Certain U.S. states may characterize predictions markets as gambling or gaming activities subject to state licensing requirements, and certain states have pursued civil and criminal enforcement actions against predictions market platforms

  • NewRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    Event contracts relating to sports outcomes are subject to heightened regulatory and legal scrutiny and may be subject to state sports betting licensing requirements in addition to federal commodity regulation

  • NewRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    BNC is subject to know-your-customer and anti-money laundering compliance obligations that could increase its operating costs and restrict its ability to onboard users

  • NewRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    BNC may be subject to consumer protection claims and problem gambling liability as regulators and courts increasingly characterize predictions market activity as a form of gambling with associated public health consequences

  • NewRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    Congressional legislation addressing the regulatory framework for predictions markets could alter the conditions under which BNC operates, with outcomes that may be favorable or adverse to BNC’s business

  • NewRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    Numerous foreign jurisdictions have already classified predictions market platforms as illegal gambling and banned their operation, which may significantly restrict BNC’s ability to serve international users

  • NewRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    The regulatory framework for predictions markets in certain foreign jurisdictions is actively evolving, and changes in those frameworks could affect BNC’s ability to operate in markets that are currently accessible

  • NewRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    BNC’s geographic access controls may be insufficient to prevent users in prohibited jurisdictions from accessing the Platform, which could expose BNC to regulatory enforcement in those jurisdictions

  • NewRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    Changes in law or regulatory policy applicable to predictions markets could require BNC to make significant changes to its business model or cease operations in certain jurisdictions

  • NewRisks Related to Data, Security, and Intellectual Property

    The collection and handling of user personal data, including information gathered through the user verification process, exposes BNC to data privacy compliance obligations and the risk of regulatory enforcement

  • NewRisks Related to Data, Security, and Intellectual Property

    BNC’s products and internal systems rely on software and hardware developed in part by third parties, and BNC has limited visibility into and control over the security and reliability practices of those providers

  • NewRisks Related to Data, Security, and Intellectual Property

    BNC may be unable to adequately protect its intellectual property, and third parties may assert that BNC’s Platform or technology infringes their intellectual property rights

  • NewRisks Related to the OnlyBulls Platform

    The OnlyBulls platform depends on third-party market data providers, and any disruption to or termination of those relationships could impair our ability to deliver core platform functionality

  • NewRisks Related to the OnlyBulls Platform

    askROI’s integration with third-party charting providers exposes askROI to risks associated with those providers’ continued availability, pricing, and terms of service

  • NewRisks Related to the OnlyBulls Platform

    The DeFi self-custody wallet functionality on the OnlyBulls platform relies on Privy as its wallet infrastructure provider, and any disruption to that relationship could impair or disable askROI’s wallet offering

  • NewRisks Related to the OnlyBulls Platform

    Users of the OnlyBulls DeFi self-custody wallet bear sole responsibility for maintaining access to their authentication credentials, and the permanent loss of those credentials may result in the irreversible loss of all digital assets held in the wallet

  • NewRisks Related to the OnlyBulls Platform

    Digital asset swap functionality within OnlyBulls depends on decentralized exchange aggregators that askROI does not control, and users may experience losses or service failures associated with those protocols

  • NewRisks Related to the OnlyBulls Platform

    askROI relies on multiple third-party providers for on-ramp and off-ramp services enabling users to convert between traditional currency and digital assets, and disruptions to any of these providers could impair this functionality

  • NewRisks Related to the OnlyBulls Platform

    The DeFi self-custody wallet and related transaction features of OnlyBulls may be subject to money transmission licensing requirements, anti-money laundering obligations or other financial services regulations that could constrain askROI’s operations or require significant compliance investment

  • NewRisks Related to the OnlyBulls Platform

    AI-generated research outputs on the OnlyBulls platform could be incorrect, misleading, or misinterpreted as personalized investment advice, exposing askROI to regulatory scrutiny and legal claims

  • NewRisks Related to the OnlyBulls Platform

    Periods of volatility or sustained declines in digital asset markets could reduce user engagement with the OnlyBulls platform and adversely affect askROI’s business

  • NewRisks Related to the OnlyBulls Platform

    The DeFi self-custody wallet functionality of OnlyBulls presents heightened cybersecurity risks, and any breach or theft of digital assets could result in significant losses and reputational harm

  • NewRisks Related to the OnlyBulls Platform

    User misunderstanding of the scope of OnlyBulls’ functionality could result in reputational harm and regulatory scrutiny if users believe the platform offers securities trading capabilities, which it does not provide

  • NewRisks Related to the Purchase, Ownership and Custody of Precious Metals

    We currently have no experience as a company in purchasing, owning, holding or liquidating precious metals

  • NewRisks Related to the Purchase, Ownership and Custody of Precious Metals

    The price of precious metals is volatile

  • NewRisks Related to the Purchase, Ownership and Custody of Precious Metals

    Crises may motivate large-scale sales of precious metals which could decrease the price of precious metals and adversely affect an investment in our company

  • NewRisks Related to the Purchase, Ownership and Custody of Precious Metals

    The price of precious metals may be affected by the sale of precious metals by ETFs or other exchange traded vehicles tracking such markets

  • NewRisks Related to the Purchase, Ownership and Custody of Precious Metals

    Substantial sales of precious metals by the official sector could adversely affect our investment in precious metals

  • NewRisks Related to the Purchase, Ownership and Custody of Precious Metals

    Our precious metals may be subject to loss, damage, theft or restriction on access

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Business and Financial Condition

    Gresham has historically incurred net losses and negative cash flow and Gresham’s operating results may significantly vary from quarter to quarter, so it may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Business and Financial Condition

    If Gresham’s reputation or relationships with the governments of the United States, the United Kingdom, Israel or the limited number of defense contractors with which Gresham works were harmed, Gresham’s future revenues and cash flows would be adversely affected

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Business and Financial Condition

    Because Gresham engages in fixed fee contracts with Gresham’s customers, it faces pressure on Gresham’s gross profit margins and operating costs from inflation

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Business and Financial Condition

    Gresham’s subsidiary, Enertec, operates a production facility in Karmiel, Israel, and Gresham’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by geopolitical risks and military activity in the region

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Business and Financial Condition

    If the inflationary pressures in the United States and elsewhere where Gresham operates continue at current levels or increase, Gresham could experience reduced margins and lose future business

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Business and Financial Condition

    If Gresham loses key personnel, it could have a material adverse effect on Gresham’s financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Business and Financial Condition

    Gresham’s sales and profitability may be affected by changes in economic, business and industry conditions

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Business and Financial Condition

    These trends and factors could adversely affect Gresham’s business, results of operations and financial condition and diminish Gresham’s ability to achieve its strategic objectives

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Sales, Business Development and Competition

    Gresham’s sales cycles can be long and unpredictable, and Gresham’s sales efforts require considerable time and expense. As a result, Gresham’s sales and revenue are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from period to period, which may cause Gresham’s operating results to fluctuate significantly

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Sales, Business Development and Competition

    Gresham’s sales are significantly dependent on the defense industry and a limited number of customers

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Sales, Business Development and Competition

    Gresham faces intense industry competition and product obsolescence, which, in turn, could increase Gresham’s losses

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Sales, Business Development and Competition

    Because Gresham’s competitors have greater resources, Gresham may not be able to compete effectively

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Sales, Business Development and Competition

    The sale of Gresham’s products is dependent upon its ability to satisfy the proprietary requirements of its customers

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Operations

    If Gresham is unable to identify, attract, train and retain qualified personnel, especially its design and technical personnel, Gresham’s business and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected and it may not be able to effectively execute its business strategy

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Operations

    Gresham’s strategic focus on purpose-built electronics solutions and concurrent cost reduction plans may be ineffective or may limit its ability to compete

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Operations

    A significant portion of Gresham’s contracts are fixed-price contracts that could subject it to losses in the event of cost overruns or a material increase in inflation

  • NewRisks Related to Gresham’s Operations

    Gresham’s subsidiaries purchase a significant amount of their components and products outside of the countries in which they operate

  • NewRisks Related to the Chapter 11 Case

    As a result of the Chapter 11 Case, Gresham’s financial results may be volatile and may not reflect historical trends

  • NewRisks Related to the Chapter 11 Case

    Gresham has experienced, and may continue to experience, increased levels of employee attrition as a result of the Chapter 11 Case

  • NewRisks Related to the Planned Divestiture of Ault Capital

    Completion of the Divestiture could result in a decline in the price of our Class A common stock

  • NewRisks Related to the Planned Divestiture of Ault Capital

    The Divestiture might not be completed or not be completed within the envisaged time frame

  • NewRisks Related to the Planned Divestiture of Ault Capital

    Certain of our executive officers and directors may have actual or potential conflicts of interest after the Divestiture

Dropped

  • DroppedRisks Related to Related Party Transactions

    Our relationship with Alzamend may expose us to certain conflicts of interest

  • DroppedRisks Related to RiskOn

    BNC’s products and changes to such products could fail to attract or retain users or generate revenue and profits, or otherwise adversely affect BNC’s business

  • DroppedRisks Related to RiskOn

    Our reliance on third-party certified game providers creates operational, compliance, and reputational vulnerabilities that could adversely impact our business

  • DroppedRisks Related to RiskOn

    The lack of comprehensive encryption for communications on the Platform may increase the impact of a data security incident

  • DroppedRisks Related to RiskOn

    Challenges in advertising and promoting our sweepstakes could hinder our user acquisition and revenue growth

  • DroppedRisks Related to RiskOn

    A perceived lack of fairness in outcomes or prize distribution could severely damage brand trust

  • DroppedRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    Our sweepstakes model could be reclassified as gambling or otherwise face tighter restrictions in certain U.S. states, which would materially affect our operations

  • DroppedRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    We are subject to complex and evolving U.S. federal and state sweepstakes and consumer protection laws, which may impose substantial compliance burdens and operational constraints

  • DroppedRisks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

    Regulatory inquiries or legal proceedings related to AML, consumer fraud, or other compliance areas could disrupt our business and harm our reputation

  • DroppedRisks Related to Data, Security, and Intellectual Property

    We anticipate that BNC’s efforts related to privacy, safety, security, and content review will identify additional instances of misuse of user data or other undesirable activity by third parties on the Platform

  • DroppedRisks Related to Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock and Future Offerings

    The listing of our Class A common stock on the NYSE American is contingent on our compliance with the NYSE American’s conditions for continued listing

Reworded

  • 97% rewrittenRisks Related to Data, Security, and Intellectual Property

    Security breaches, cyberattacks, and attempts to manipulate market outcomes could undermine trust in the Platform and materially harm BNC’s business

    Updated BNC platform description from a sweepstakes social gaming environment to a predictions market platform.

    Was: Security breaches, unauthorized attempts to manipulate or “cheat” sweepstakes outcomes, and other cyber incidents could undermine trust in the Platform and adversely affect BNC’s business

  • 94% rewrittenRisks Related to Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock and Future Offerings

    You may experience future dilution as a result of future equity offerings

    Clarified that future capital raises and dilution will specifically involve shares of Class A common stock.

  • 92% rewrittenRisks Related to TurnOnGreen

    TurnOnGreen is in a highly competitive EV charging services industry and there can be no assurance that TurnOnGreen will be able to compete with many of its competitors, which are larger and have greater financial resources

    Added specific competitive factors for TurnOnGreen such as technical qualifications, past contract performance, geographic presence, and pricing.

  • 90% rewrittenRisks Related to TurnOnGreen

    Changes in U.S. and international trade policies, particularly with respect to China, and key trading countries, may adversely impact TurnOnGreen’s business and operating results

    Specified TurnOnGreen tariff rates reaching up to 145% on China imports and 10% on Taiwan and Israel imports.

  • 85% rewrittenRisks Related to RiskOn International and BitNile.com - General

    BNC’s products and internal systems rely on software and hardware that is highly technical, and any errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities in these systems could adversely affect BNC’s business

    Expanded BNC software error consequences to include billing or settlement errors and intellectual property protection risks.

    Was: BNC’s products and internal systems rely on software and hardware that is highly technical, and any errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities in these systems, or failures to address or mitigate technical limitations in BNC’s systems, could adversely affect BNC’s business

  • 83% rewrittenRisks Related to Circle 8

    Furthermore, as Circle 8 expands its operations, it may need to rely on suppliers and logistics partners in new geographic regions, which could expose Circle 8 to additional supply chain risks

    Added that Circle 8 added a Liebherr crane from Germany alongside Manitowoc/Grove units.

    Was: Furthermore, as Circle 8 expands its operations, it may need to rely on suppliers and logistics partners in new geographic regions, which could expose the company to additional supply chain risks

  • 72% rewrittenRisks Related to TurnOnGreen

    TurnOnGreen can provide no assurance of any successful expansion of its operations

    Minor phrasing adjustments regarding TurnOnGreen's operating expenses and internal management systems.

  • 60% rewrittenRisks Related to Circle 8

    As Circle 8’s rental fleet ages, its operating costs may increase, it may be unable to pass along such costs to customers, and earnings may decrease. The costs of new fleet units may increase, requiring Circle 8 to spend more for replacement equipment or preventing it from procuring equipment on a timely basis

    Added concrete fleet data for Circle 8, noting an average crane age increase from nine to ten years with a 20-year service life.

  • 48% rewrittenRisks Related to Related Party Transactions

    Our relationship with Ault & Company may enhance the difficulty inherent in obtaining financing for us as well as expose us to certain conflicts of interest

  • 46% rewrittenRisks Related to Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock and Future Offerings

    We have a substantial number of convertible notes, warrants and preferred stock outstanding that could affect our price

  • 43% rewrittenRisks Related to Our Bitcoin Operations – Legal and Regulatory

    If the SEC or another regulatory body considers Bitcoin to be a security under U.S. securities laws, we may be required to comply with significant SEC registration and/or other requirements

  • 41% rewrittenRisks Related to Related Party Transactions

    Our relationship with ROI may expose us to certain conflicts of interest

  • 34% rewrittenRisks Related to Our Company

    We may not be able to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards

  • 32% rewrittenRisks Related to Circle 8

    The inability to forecast trends accurately may have an adverse impact on Circle 8’s business and financial condition

  • 30% rewrittenRisk related to technological advancements and obsolescence of current Bitcoin mining equipment

    Bitcoin may have concentrated ownership and large sales or distributions by holders of Bitcoin assets could have an adverse effect on the market price of Bitcoin

  • 29% rewrittenRisks Related to Circle 8

    Circle 8’s fleet is subject to residual value risk upon disposition

  • 26% rewrittenRisks Related to the Planned Divestiture of Ault Capital

    The elimination of monetary liability against our directors, officers and employees under law and the existence of indemnification rights for or obligations to our directors, officers and employees may result in substantial expenditures by us and may discourage lawsuits against our directors, officers and employees

  • 26% rewrittenRisks Related to the Planned Divestiture of Ault Capital

    Deterioration of global economic conditions could adversely affect our business

  • 22% rewrittenRisks Related to Our Indebtedness and Liquidity

    We will need to raise additional capital to fund our operations in furtherance of our business plan

All 206 risk factors

Headings as the filing states them, in filing order.

Risks Related to Our Company

  1. 01We have an evolving business model, which increases the complexity of our business
  2. 02We are heavily dependent on our senior management, and a loss of a member of our senior management team could cause our stock price to suffer
  3. 03We rely on highly skilled personnel and the continuing efforts of our executive officers and, if we are unable to retain, motivate or hire qualified personnel, our business may be severely disrupted
  4. 04We may not be able to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards34% rewritten

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness and Liquidity

  1. 05We will need to raise additional capital to fund our operations in furtherance of our business plan22% rewritten
  2. 06To service any future indebtedness and other obligations, we will require a significant amount of cash

Risks Related to Circle 8

  1. 07Circle 8’s business is, directly and indirectly, dependent on a functioning global supply chain system. The oil and steel markets are global, and many suppliers, vendors, OEM’s and parts manufacturers for Circle 8 and its clients’ industries are offshore
  2. 08Furthermore, as Circle 8 expands its operations, it may need to rely on suppliers and logistics partners in new geographic regions, which could expose Circle 8 to additional supply chain risks83% rewritten
  3. 09Circle 8 faces risks related to heightened inflation, recession, financial and credit market disruptions and other economic conditions
  4. 10The inability to forecast trends accurately may have an adverse impact on Circle 8’s business and financial condition32% rewritten
  5. 11Circle 8’s revenue and operating results may fluctuate, which could result in a decline in profitability and make it more difficult to grow the business
  6. 12Circle 8 is subject to competition, which may have a material adverse effect on its business by reducing its ability to increase or maintain revenues or profitability
  7. 13The cost of new Circle 8 rental fleet units may increase and therefore may require a larger equity investment equipment. In some cases, it may not be possible to procure equipment on a timely basis due to supplier constraints, among other reasons
  8. 14Circle 8’s fleet is subject to residual value risk upon disposition29% rewritten
  9. 15As Circle 8’s rental fleet ages, its operating costs may increase, it may be unable to pass along such costs to customers, and earnings may decrease. The costs of new fleet units may increase, requiring Circle 8 to spend more for replacement equipment or preventing it from procuring equipment on a timely basis60% rewritten
  10. 16Labor disputes could disrupt Circle 8’s ability to serve its customers and/or lead to higher labor costs
  11. 17Climate change, climate change regulations and greenhouse effects may materially adversely impact Circle 8 operations and markets

Risks Related to Our Bitcoin Strategy and Holdings

  1. 18Our Bitcoin strategy exposes us to various risks, including risks associated with BitcoinNew
  2. 19Our Bitcoin strategy subjects us to enhanced regulatory oversightNew
  3. 20The concentration of our Bitcoin holdings enhances the risks inherent in our Bitcoin strategyNew
  4. 21The emergence or growth of other digital assets, including those with significant private or public sector backing, could have a negative impact on the price of Bitcoin and adversely affect our businessNew

Risks Related to Our Bitcoin Operations – General

  1. 22Acceptance and/or widespread use of Bitcoin is uncertain
  2. 23The development and acceptance of cryptographic and algorithmic protocols governing the issuance of and transactions in cryptocurrencies is subject to a variety of special economic, geopolitical and regulatory factors, which could slow the growth of the industry in general and our company as a result
  3. 24Political or economic crises may motivate large-scale sales of cryptocurrencies, which could result in a reduction in values of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and adversely affect an investment in us
  4. 25Negative media attention and public perception surrounding energy consumption by cryptocurrency mining may adversely affect our reputation and, consequently, our stock price; particularly in the eyes of some of our investors who may be more interested in our non-crypto operations as a holding company
  5. 26Banks and financial institutions may not provide banking services, or may cut off services, to businesses like us that engage in cryptocurrency-related activities
  6. 27The price of cryptocurrencies may be affected by the sale of such cryptocurrencies by other vehicles investing in cryptocurrencies or tracking cryptocurrency markets. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any Bitcoin we mine

Risk related to technological advancements and obsolescence of current Bitcoin mining equipment

  1. 28Our operations are exposed to the risk of rapid technological advancements in the development and production of Bitcoin mining equipment, which could render our existing mining infrastructure obsolete and adversely impact our financial performance
  2. 29Our future success will depend in part upon the value of Bitcoin. The value of Bitcoin may be subject to pricing risk and has historically been subject to wide swings
  3. 30We may be unable to raise additional capital needed to grow our data center hosting business
  4. 31The emergence of competing blockchain platforms or technologies may harm our business as presently conducted by preventing us from realizing the anticipated profits from our investments and forcing us to expend additional capital in an effort to adapt
  5. 32We rely on one or more third parties for depositing, storing and withdrawing the Bitcoin we receive, which could result in a loss of assets, disputes and other liabilities or risks which could adversely impact our business
  6. 33If a malicious actor or botnet obtains control of more than 50% of the processing power on a cryptocurrency network, such actor or botnet could manipulate blockchains to adversely affect us, which would adversely affect an investment in our company and our ability to operate
  7. 34Our reliance on a third-party mining pool service provider for our mining revenue payouts may have a negative impact on our operations such as a result of cyber-attacks against the mining pool operator and/or our limited recourse against the mining pool operator with respect to rewards paid to us
  8. 35Bitcoin may have concentrated ownership and large sales or distributions by holders of Bitcoin assets could have an adverse effect on the market price of Bitcoin30% rewritten

Risks Related to Our Bitcoin Operations – Legal and Regulatory

  1. 36We are subject to a highly evolving regulatory landscape and any adverse changes to, or our failure to comply with, any laws and regulations could adversely affect our business, prospects or operations
  2. 37Ongoing and future regulatory actions may impact our ability to continue to operate, and such actions could affect our ability to continue as a going concern or to pursue our strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations
  3. 38If the SEC or another regulatory body considers Bitcoin to be a security under U.S. securities laws, we may be required to comply with significant SEC registration and/or other requirements43% rewritten
  4. 39Current interpretations require the regulation of Bitcoin under the CEA by the CFTC, and we may be required to register and comply with such regulations. Any disruption of our operations in response to the changed regulatory circumstances may be at a time that is disadvantageous to our investorsNew
  5. 40We are subject to risks associated with our need for significant electrical power. Government regulators may potentially restrict the ability of electricity suppliers to provide electricity to mining operations, such as ours
  6. 41Our interactions with a blockchain may expose us to specially designated nationals or blocked persons or cause us to violate provisions of law that did not contemplate distributed ledger technology

Risks Related to Our Bitcoin Operations – Technological

  1. 42The characteristics of crypto assets have been, and may in the future continue to be, exploited to facilitate illegal activity such as fraud, money laundering, tax evasion and ransomware scams; if any of our customers do so or are alleged to have done so, it could adversely affect us
  2. 43Incorrect or fraudulent cryptocurrency transactions may be irreversible and it is possible that, through computer or human error, or through theft or criminal action, our cryptocurrency rewards could be transferred in incorrect amounts or to unauthorized third parties
  3. 44Cryptocurrencies, including those maintained by or for us, may be exposed to cybersecurity threats and hacks
  4. 45Our use of third-party mining pools exposes us to additional risks

Risks Related to Omnipresent

  1. 46Omnipresent intends to operate in an emerging industry that is subject to rapid technological change and will experience increasing competitionNew
  2. 47Omnipresent’s business plans require a significant amount of capital. Future capital needs may require us to sell additional equity or debt securities that may dilute our stockholdersNew
  3. 48Omnipresent has no experience in operating robots. Unforeseen safety issues with its future products could result in injuries to people which would in turn result in adverse effects on Hyperscale Data’s business and reputationNew
  4. 49Omnipresent must successfully manage product introductions and transitions in order to become competitiveNew
  5. 50If any of these or other factors becomes problematic, Omnipresent may not be able to develop and introduce new robotic solutions in a timely or cost-effective manner, and its anticipated business may be harmedNew
  6. 51Components used in Omnipresent’s future products sensors may fail as a result of manufacturing, design or other defects over which it has no control and render its anticipated devices permanently inoperableNew

Risks Related to Our Ault Blockchain Operations

  1. 52All capital that we have invested through Ault Capital in the Ault Blockchain could be lost entirelyNew
  2. 53We have never built or operated a public blockchain network, and we may be unable to successfully execute a venture of this technical and operational complexityNew
  3. 54We may lack the internal organizational capacity and management bandwidth required to build and operate a public blockchain network while simultaneously operating our existing businessesNew
  4. 55A new blockchain network has no established value without participants, and participants may not join a network that does not yet have demonstrated value, a challenge that may prove impossible to overcomeNew
  5. 56No secondary market for AULT Tokens may ever develop, which would make the tokens economically worthless and undermine the economic rationale for purchasing a Node LicenseNew
  6. 57The Ault Blockchain Mainnet launched in March 2026 and we have no meaningful track record from which investors can evaluate the performance or long-term prospects of this businessNew
  7. 58The node license program is a novel commercial structure with no established market precedent, and the market may not accept itNew
  8. 59A significant failure in the Ault Blockchain business could harm the reputation and operations of our other business segments, and adverse developments in other segments could in turn harm the Ault BlockchainNew
  9. 60Ongoing development of the Ault Blockchain requires continued capital investment that may not be available on acceptable terms or at allNew
  10. 61The Ault Blockchain depends on a small number of individuals with specialized knowledge who are not easily replaced, and the loss of any of them could significantly harm our operationsNew
  11. 62The Ault Blockchain competes against established blockchain networks with substantially greater resources, participation, and proven track records, and may be unable to compete effectivelyNew
  12. 63Broad declines or periods of negative sentiment in digital asset markets generally could reduce demand for Node Licenses and adversely affect the Ault Blockchain business regardless of the network’s own performanceNew
  13. 64The long-term strategy for the Ault Blockchain depends on applications that have not been built, and these applications may not be successfully developed or may fail to attract usersNew
  14. 65The strategy of building a blockchain network oriented toward tokenized real-world assets depends on legal, custodial, and market infrastructure that does not yet fully exist, and the execution of this strategy may prove more complex and costly than we currently anticipateNew

Operational and Financial Risks

  1. 66The core software underlying the Ault Blockchain is developed primarily by an outside firm rather than an internal team, creating dependency, lack of knowledge continuity, and transition risks that could materially disrupt the networkNew
  2. 67There is currently no available insurance product that would cover losses resulting from a smart contract vulnerability, governance attack, or loss of digital asset private keys, meaning any such loss would be unrecoverableNew
  3. 68Blockchain businesses frequently face difficulty maintaining banking relationships, and the loss of banking access would impair our ability to conduct the fiat currency operations necessary to run the Ault Blockchain businessNew
  4. 69Affiliated entities that operate as validators or stake AULT Tokens are subject to a protocol-enforced penalties that can permanently reduce their token holdings, and any such event could result in a material financial lossNew
  5. 70Affiliated entities hold or may hold a majority of all outstanding Node Licenses, concentrating economic interests and potential governance influence within our corporate groupNew
  6. 71The Ault DAO governance process may produce decisions that are harmful to our interests or to the long-term health of the network, and we have limited ability to prevent such outcomesNew
  7. 72The on-chain treasury funded by network transaction fees is controlled by governance votes that we cannot override, and those funds may be allocated in ways that do not benefit the networkNew
  8. 73The economic arrangements between the Ault Blockchain and our affiliates create potential conflicts of interest that may not be fully aligned with the interests of unaffiliated Node License purchasersNew
  9. 74Our ability to screen Node License purchasers and governance participants depends on third-party identity verification and sanctions screening services, and any failure of those services could impair our compliance operationsNew
  10. 75We rely on external vendors and partners for critical functions we cannot fully perform in-house, and the loss of any key relationship could severely disrupt operationsNew

Legal and Regulatory Risks

  1. 76If either the AULT Token or the Node Licenses we are selling are determined to be a security under applicable law, we could be required to register token distributions as well as node sales, restructure the network’s economics, or cease operations in their current formNew
  2. 77The SEC, CFTC, FinCEN, OFAC, or other regulators may take enforcement action against us or the Ault Blockchain in connection with its digital asset activities, and any such action could be materially disruptiveNew
  3. 78The regulatory posture toward digital assets in the United States has shifted materially between presidential administrations and could shift again, creating significant uncertainty for a business built on long-term regulatory assumptionsNew
  4. 79We may be subject to obligations under federal anti-money laundering laws that impose significant compliance costs and operational requirements, and failure to comply could result in material penaltiesNew
  5. 80We apply identity verification and sanctions screening at our controlled access points, but the Ault Blockchain is a public network and we cannot prevent all protocol-level interaction by sanctioned persons, which may expose us to regulatory riskNew
  6. 81The Wyoming decentralized autonomous organization limited liability company statute is a new and largely untested area of law, and courts or regulators in other jurisdictions may not recognize or enforce the protections it providesNew
  7. 82Before the network reaches a defined stage of operation, Ault DAO LLC retains the unilateral authority to amend the governing Constitution, which means the terms that Node License purchasers agreed to could change after purchaseNew
  8. 83The Ault Blockchain operates across multiple regulatory jurisdictions, and adverse regulatory developments in any major jurisdiction could restrict participant access and impair the network’s global growthNew
  9. 84Planned applications involving tokenized financial assets may require exchange, alternative trading system, or broker-dealer registration that we do not currently hold, and the absence of such registration could prevent these applications from launchingNew
  10. 85The Ault Blockchain is a public network on which any developer may deploy applications without approval, and harmful or non-compliant applications could expose the network and our company to regulatory scrutiny and reputational harmNew
  11. 86The accounting and tax treatment of AULT Token distributions received by affiliated entities is uncertain, and adverse determinations could result in unexpected financial and tax liabilitiesNew
  12. 87We may be subject to regulatory enforcement proceedings, class action litigation from Node License purchasers, or other legal proceedings that could result in material costs, penalties, and operational disruptionNew
  13. 88Participants who lose access to their Node Licenses or earned tokens due to the loss of their private keys may bring claims against us despite the fact that we have no custody of or access to those assetsNew
  14. 89The governing Constitution limits member claims against us and requires binding arbitration, but these provisions may not be enforceable in all jurisdictions and may not fully protect us from litigationNew

Technology Risks

  1. 90Protocol and smart contract vulnerabilities; the software underlying the Ault Blockchain, may contain bugs or security flaws that could be exploited to cause permanent, unrecoverable harm to the network and its participantsNew
  2. 91Theft or compromise of the private keys controlling affiliated entities’ AULT Token holdings could result in the permanent loss of significant digital assets, with no ability to recover themNew
  3. 92Block production on the Ault Blockchain is concentrated among the top 100 validators, and the compromise or coordination of a significant portion of that group could disrupt or manipulate the networkNew
  4. 93The verifiable random function system that node operators depend on for their participation in the network could produce compromised outputs if a sufficient number of nodes are coordinated or manipulated, undermining network functions that rely on randomnessNew
  5. 94Governance-approved changes to the network’s software may introduce unforeseen technical problems, and disagreements over upgrades could result in the network splitting into additional, incompatible versionsNew
  6. 95The Ault Blockchain is built on open-source components that we do not own or fully control, and vulnerabilities or changes introduced by third-party maintainers could affect the security and stability of the networkNew
  7. 96The Ault Blockchain’s planned cross-chain connectivity relies on LayerZero, an external cross-chain messaging protocol that we do not own or control, and any failure, vulnerability, or adverse change affecting LayerZero could disrupt the network’s cross-chain functionalityNew
  8. 97The Ault Blockchain may not perform as designed under real-world conditions, and performance failures could drive participants and developers to competing networksNew
  9. 98The blockchain technology underlying the Ault Blockchain is evolving rapidly, and the network’s current architecture could become technically outdated relative to newer networks, reducing its competitivenessNew

Risks Related to Our Status as a Holding Company

  1. 99Our inability to successfully integrate new acquisitions could adversely affect our combined business; our operations are widely disbursed
  2. 100If we make any additional acquisitions, they may disrupt or have a negative impact on our business
  3. 101Increasing revenues through acquisitions is one of the key components of our growth strategy. Identifying suitable acquisition candidates can be difficult, time-consuming and costly, and we may not be able to identify suitable candidates or complete acquisitions in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis or at all
  4. 102Future acquisitions or business opportunities could involve unknown risks that could harm our business and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations
  5. 103In pursuing our corporate strategy, we may acquire, dispose of or exit businesses or reorganize existing investments. The success of this strategy is dependent upon our ability to identify appropriate opportunities, negotiate transactions on favorable terms and ultimately complete such transactions
  6. 104Our development stage companies may never produce revenues or income
  7. 105Divestitures and contingent liabilities from divested businesses could adversely affect our business and financial results

Risks Related to Related Party Transactions

  1. 106Our relationship with Ault & Company may enhance the difficulty inherent in obtaining financing for us as well as expose us to certain conflicts of interest48% rewritten
  2. 107Our relationship with ROI may expose us to certain conflicts of interest41% rewritten

Risks Related to RiskOn International and BitNile.com - General

  1. 108BNC has no operating history in the predictions market industry, and its prior sweepstakes gaming operations are not indicative of future performance in its new businessNew
  2. 109The Platform is currently in alpha testing and is not yet commercially available, and BNC may face significant delays or obstacles in completing development and launching to a broader user baseNew
  3. 110The Platform’s availability is restricted to permitted jurisdictions, which significantly limits BNC’s addressable market and may constrain revenue growthNew
  4. 111Predictions markets require sufficient two-sided market liquidity to function effectively, and BNC may be unable to attract and maintain the user base necessary to support a viable marketplaceNew
  5. 112BNC faces competition from well-capitalized and, in certain cases, already-regulated predictions market platforms, and the competitive landscape is expanding rapidlyNew
  6. 113BNC’s Platform depends on third-party data providers to supply verified real-world event outcomes for settlement purposes, and disruptions in those services could impair the Platform’s ability to settle markets accurately and on timeNew
  7. 114BNC’s products and internal systems rely on software and hardware that is highly technical, and any errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities in these systems could adversely affect BNC’s business85% rewritten
  8. 115BNC’s ability to grow its user base and generate revenue depends on its ability to attract and retain users in a market where user switching costs are low and competing platforms are readily accessibleNew
  9. 116BNC’s ability to access payment processing services and maintain banking relationships may be constrained by the regulatory uncertainty surrounding the predictions market industryNew

Risks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement Regarding BNC

  1. 117The predictions market industry is subject to complex and evolving federal and state regulation, and BNC may be required to obtain regulatory authorizations it has not yet obtained before it can operate commercially in certain jurisdictionsNew
  2. 118The CFTC has broad authority over event contracts, and regulatory action by the CFTC could require BNC to restructure or discontinue certain aspects of its businessNew
  3. 119The question of whether federal regulation of predictions market platforms preempts state gambling and gaming laws is actively contested in courts across multiple jurisdictions, and an adverse outcome could materially restrict BNC’s operationsNew
  4. 120Certain U.S. states may characterize predictions markets as gambling or gaming activities subject to state licensing requirements, and certain states have pursued civil and criminal enforcement actions against predictions market platformsNew
  5. 121Event contracts relating to sports outcomes are subject to heightened regulatory and legal scrutiny and may be subject to state sports betting licensing requirements in addition to federal commodity regulationNew
  6. 122BNC is subject to know-your-customer and anti-money laundering compliance obligations that could increase its operating costs and restrict its ability to onboard usersNew
  7. 123BNC may be subject to consumer protection claims and problem gambling liability as regulators and courts increasingly characterize predictions market activity as a form of gambling with associated public health consequencesNew
  8. 124Congressional legislation addressing the regulatory framework for predictions markets could alter the conditions under which BNC operates, with outcomes that may be favorable or adverse to BNC’s businessNew
  9. 125Numerous foreign jurisdictions have already classified predictions market platforms as illegal gambling and banned their operation, which may significantly restrict BNC’s ability to serve international usersNew
  10. 126The regulatory framework for predictions markets in certain foreign jurisdictions is actively evolving, and changes in those frameworks could affect BNC’s ability to operate in markets that are currently accessibleNew
  11. 127BNC’s geographic access controls may be insufficient to prevent users in prohibited jurisdictions from accessing the Platform, which could expose BNC to regulatory enforcement in those jurisdictionsNew
  12. 128Changes in law or regulatory policy applicable to predictions markets could require BNC to make significant changes to its business model or cease operations in certain jurisdictionsNew

Risks Related to Data, Security, and Intellectual Property

  1. 129Security breaches, cyberattacks, and attempts to manipulate market outcomes could undermine trust in the Platform and materially harm BNC’s business97% rewritten
  2. 130The collection and handling of user personal data, including information gathered through the user verification process, exposes BNC to data privacy compliance obligations and the risk of regulatory enforcementNew
  3. 131BNC’s products and internal systems rely on software and hardware developed in part by third parties, and BNC has limited visibility into and control over the security and reliability practices of those providersNew
  4. 132BNC may be unable to adequately protect its intellectual property, and third parties may assert that BNC’s Platform or technology infringes their intellectual property rightsNew

Risks Related to askROI

  1. 133We rely on an exclusive LLM licensing arrangement and a platform development agreement with the same primary developer, even though we maintain ownership of the askROI platform’s IP
  2. 134Despite our multi-LLM routing model, performance or reliability issues with our primary development partner’s LLM could still harm our product quality and reputation
  3. 135askROI faces risks commonly associated with start-up companies
  4. 136askROI faces adoption and integration and other challenges
  5. 137Rapidly changing AI regulation may require significant adjustments and investments
  6. 138Data privacy and security laws could increase compliance costs and limit our flexibility
  7. 139Established technology companies with greater resources may outcompete us
  8. 140Our future success depends on ongoing innovation and technological advancements
  9. 141Our platform’s integration with third-party tools and systems may present technical and operational risks
  10. 142We rely on secure workspaces and knowledge bases that may still pose data exposure risks
  11. 143Inaccurate or biased AI outputs could expose us to reputational and legal risks
  12. 144Our proprietary rights could be inadequately protected, leading to IP disputes
  13. 145Customer retention risks could pose a challenge for askROI
  14. 146Uncertain legal interpretations of emerging AI regulations could lead to operational constraints
  15. 147If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our business could suffer

Risks Related to the OnlyBulls Platform

  1. 148The OnlyBulls platform depends on third-party market data providers, and any disruption to or termination of those relationships could impair our ability to deliver core platform functionalityNew
  2. 149askROI’s integration with third-party charting providers exposes askROI to risks associated with those providers’ continued availability, pricing, and terms of serviceNew
  3. 150The DeFi self-custody wallet functionality on the OnlyBulls platform relies on Privy as its wallet infrastructure provider, and any disruption to that relationship could impair or disable askROI’s wallet offeringNew
  4. 151Users of the OnlyBulls DeFi self-custody wallet bear sole responsibility for maintaining access to their authentication credentials, and the permanent loss of those credentials may result in the irreversible loss of all digital assets held in the walletNew
  5. 152Digital asset swap functionality within OnlyBulls depends on decentralized exchange aggregators that askROI does not control, and users may experience losses or service failures associated with those protocolsNew
  6. 153askROI relies on multiple third-party providers for on-ramp and off-ramp services enabling users to convert between traditional currency and digital assets, and disruptions to any of these providers could impair this functionalityNew
  7. 154The DeFi self-custody wallet and related transaction features of OnlyBulls may be subject to money transmission licensing requirements, anti-money laundering obligations or other financial services regulations that could constrain askROI’s operations or require significant compliance investmentNew
  8. 155AI-generated research outputs on the OnlyBulls platform could be incorrect, misleading, or misinterpreted as personalized investment advice, exposing askROI to regulatory scrutiny and legal claimsNew
  9. 156Periods of volatility or sustained declines in digital asset markets could reduce user engagement with the OnlyBulls platform and adversely affect askROI’s businessNew
  10. 157The DeFi self-custody wallet functionality of OnlyBulls presents heightened cybersecurity risks, and any breach or theft of digital assets could result in significant losses and reputational harmNew
  11. 158User misunderstanding of the scope of OnlyBulls’ functionality could result in reputational harm and regulatory scrutiny if users believe the platform offers securities trading capabilities, which it does not provideNew

Risks Related to the Purchase, Ownership and Custody of Precious Metals

  1. 159We currently have no experience as a company in purchasing, owning, holding or liquidating precious metalsNew
  2. 160The price of precious metals is volatileNew
  3. 161Crises may motivate large-scale sales of precious metals which could decrease the price of precious metals and adversely affect an investment in our companyNew
  4. 162The price of precious metals may be affected by the sale of precious metals by ETFs or other exchange traded vehicles tracking such marketsNew
  5. 163Substantial sales of precious metals by the official sector could adversely affect our investment in precious metalsNew
  6. 164Our precious metals may be subject to loss, damage, theft or restriction on accessNew

Risks Related to Gresham’s Business and Financial Condition

  1. 165Gresham has historically incurred net losses and negative cash flow and Gresham’s operating results may significantly vary from quarter to quarter, so it may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability New
  2. 166If Gresham’s reputation or relationships with the governments of the United States, the United Kingdom, Israel or the limited number of defense contractors with which Gresham works were harmed, Gresham’s future revenues and cash flows would be adversely affectedNew
  3. 167Because Gresham engages in fixed fee contracts with Gresham’s customers, it faces pressure on Gresham’s gross profit margins and operating costs from inflation New
  4. 168Gresham’s subsidiary, Enertec, operates a production facility in Karmiel, Israel, and Gresham’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by geopolitical risks and military activity in the regionNew
  5. 169If the inflationary pressures in the United States and elsewhere where Gresham operates continue at current levels or increase, Gresham could experience reduced margins and lose future businessNew
  6. 170If Gresham loses key personnel, it could have a material adverse effect on Gresham’s financial condition, results of operations and growth prospectsNew
  7. 171Gresham’s sales and profitability may be affected by changes in economic, business and industry conditionsNew
  8. 172These trends and factors could adversely affect Gresham’s business, results of operations and financial condition and diminish Gresham’s ability to achieve its strategic objectivesNew

Risks Related to Gresham’s Sales, Business Development and Competition

  1. 173Gresham’s sales cycles can be long and unpredictable, and Gresham’s sales efforts require considerable time and expense. As a result, Gresham’s sales and revenue are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from period to period, which may cause Gresham’s operating results to fluctuate significantlyNew
  2. 174Gresham’s sales are significantly dependent on the defense industry and a limited number of customersNew
  3. 175Gresham faces intense industry competition and product obsolescence, which, in turn, could increase Gresham’s lossesNew
  4. 176Because Gresham’s competitors have greater resources, Gresham may not be able to compete effectivelyNew
  5. 177The sale of Gresham’s products is dependent upon its ability to satisfy the proprietary requirements of its customersNew

Risks Related to Gresham’s Operations

  1. 178If Gresham is unable to identify, attract, train and retain qualified personnel, especially its design and technical personnel, Gresham’s business and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected and it may not be able to effectively execute its business strategyNew
  2. 179Gresham’s strategic focus on purpose-built electronics solutions and concurrent cost reduction plans may be ineffective or may limit its ability to competeNew
  3. 180A significant portion of Gresham’s contracts are fixed-price contracts that could subject it to losses in the event of cost overruns or a material increase in inflationNew
  4. 181Gresham’s subsidiaries purchase a significant amount of their components and products outside of the countries in which they operateNew

Risks Related to the Chapter 11 Case

  1. 182As a result of the Chapter 11 Case, Gresham’s financial results may be volatile and may not reflect historical trends New
  2. 183Gresham has experienced, and may continue to experience, increased levels of employee attrition as a result of the Chapter 11 Case New

Risks Related to TurnOnGreen

  1. 184TurnOnGreen can provide no assurance of any successful expansion of its operations72% rewritten
  2. 185Changes in U.S. and international trade policies, particularly with respect to China, and key trading countries, may adversely impact TurnOnGreen’s business and operating results90% rewritten
  3. 186TurnOnGreen is in a highly competitive EV charging services industry and there can be no assurance that TurnOnGreen will be able to compete with many of its competitors, which are larger and have greater financial resources92% rewritten

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock and Future Offerings

  1. 187You may experience future dilution as a result of future equity offerings94% rewritten
  2. 188Our Class A common stock price is volatile
  3. 189Volatility in our Class A common stock price may subject us to securities litigation
  4. 190We have a substantial number of convertible notes, warrants and preferred stock outstanding that could affect our price46% rewritten

Risks Related to the Planned Divestiture of Ault Capital

  1. 191Completion of the Divestiture could result in a decline in the price of our Class A common stockNew
  2. 192The Divestiture might not be completed or not be completed within the envisaged time frameNew
  3. 193Certain of our executive officers and directors may have actual or potential conflicts of interest after the DivestitureNew
  4. 194Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our future business prospects and to make decisions based on our historical performance
  5. 195Deterioration of global economic conditions could adversely affect our business 26% rewritten
  6. 196If our accounting controls and procedures are circumvented or otherwise fail to achieve their intended purposes, our business could be seriously harmed
  7. 197Our internal computer systems may fail or suffer security breaches, which could result in a material disruption of our operations
  8. 198We face significant competition, including changes in pricing
  9. 199Many of our competitors are larger and have greater financial and other resources than we do
  10. 200Our growth strategy is subject to a significant degree of risk
  11. 201Changes in the U.S. tax and other laws and regulations may adversely affect our business
  12. 202Our sales and profitability may be affected by changes in economic, business and industry conditions
  13. 203The rights of the holders of common stock may be impaired by the potential issuance of preferred stock
  14. 204The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members
  15. 205The elimination of monetary liability against our directors, officers and employees under law and the existence of indemnification rights for or obligations to our directors, officers and employees may result in substantial expenditures by us and may discourage lawsuits against our directors, officers and employees26% rewritten
  16. 206We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock and, accordingly, stockholders must rely on stock appreciation for any return on their investment

Other Hyperscale Data 10-Ks

  • FY2024 10-K risk factors
    97 risks

    The company relies heavily on specific key executives, notably Milton C. Ault, III, and faces intense regulatory and market scrutiny surrounding Bitcoin mining, energy consumption, and AI data center operations.

    Filed Apr 15, 2025

About this page

The headings are the filing's own. The one-line readings and the overview are automated and can be wrong: read Item 1A of the 10-K for the exact wording.