Novo Nordisk A S (NVO) M&A call, October 20, 2025 transcript

Transcript, summary, guidance, and what analysts pressed on from the Novo Nordisk A S call on October 20, 2025.

Held
October 20, 2025
Length
28 min
Tone
Confident0.72
Analysts
10
Words
4,181
Global MASH patients
over 250 millionprevalence growing
F3 progression to F4
around 20% within two years
HARMONY fibrosis improvement
49%F2–F3; no worsening of MASH
HARMONY MASH resolution
37%F2–F3; no worsening of fibrosis
2026 operating-profit growth impact
minus 3%higher R&D costs
Synchrony Real-World readout
as early as next year

Summary

Management framed the acquisition as a strategic portfolio investment targeting MASH patients not adequately served by incretins, especially those with F4 cirrhosis.

  • EFX was positioned as potentially best-in-class and more de-risked than competing FGF21 assets, partly due to its later-stage program.
  • The call emphasized portfolio coverage across F2–F4 and potential additivity with GLP-1 therapy, while leaving combinations and additional indications unquantified.
  • 3%Management said 2026 operating-profit growth would face a roughly 3% drag from higher Phase III R&D costs.

Guidance

  • 2025 operating-profit growth: no expected change from the acquisition.
  • 3%2026 operating-profit growth: approximately 3% negative impact, driven by increased Phase III R&D costs.
  • Synchrony Real-World first readout: anticipated as early as next year.
  • Synchrony F4 outcomes readout: expected around the turn of the decade.

What analysts pressed on

  • 01EFX differentiation and deal premium: management cited learnings from its discontinued FGF21 program, stronger efficacy and potentially better tolerability, plus a more advanced, de-risked program.
  • 02Portfolio overlap: management sees EFX serving F4 and faster-progressing or poorer-responding F2–F3 patients, complementing semaglutide.
  • 03GLP-1 combination: Phase II data showed added effect in patients already receiving baseline GLP-1 treatment; further combinations will be explored.
  • 04Competitive mechanisms: management expects glucagon agonism to affect steatosis but said fibrosis and outcomes effects remain too early to assess.
  • 05IP and co-formulation: management declined to share IP details and said it was too early to speculate on co-formulation.
  • 06Manufacturing: management expects no E. coli platform capex, citing potential external manufacturing partners.

Notable disclosures

  • 49%49% of F2–F3 patients achieved at least one-stage fibrosis improvement without worsening MASH in HARMONY Phase II.
  • 37%37% of F2–F3 patients achieved MASH resolution without worsening fibrosis in HARMONY Phase II.
  • EFX showed statistically significant fibrosis regression in F4 patients in a Phase II trial, which management called the first such result.
  • One-third of Phase IIb participants were on baseline GLP-1 treatment, with EFX showing added effect after introduction.
  • U.S. Wegovy MASH launch feedback was described as early; management deferred an update until after the Q3 call.

Risks raised

  • EFX remains in Phase III, with pivotal F2–F3 histology and F4 outcomes readouts still years away.
  • Management said fibrosis and outcomes effects from glucagon-based competitors are too early to assess.
  • Management declined to disclose EFX intellectual-property assumptions.
  • EFX would rely on external manufacturing partners because Novo does not have the E. coli platform; no capacity capex is forecast.

Tone: Confident 0.72

Management expressed strong strategic conviction and cited encouraging Phase II differentiation, while acknowledging development timelines and declining to quantify several commercial and IP questions.

Who spoke

Company

  • Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer
  • Ludovic HelfgottExecutive Vice President, Product and Portfolio Strategy
  • Martin Holst LangeExecutive Vice President, Research and Development, and Chief Scientific Officer
  • Unidentified ManagementInvestor Relations

Analysts

  • Harry SeigermanAnalyst, UBS
  • Simon BakerAnalyst, Rothschild & Co Redburn
  • Pete FadolAnalyst, BNP Paribas
  • Connor McKayAnalyst, BMO Capital Markets
  • Michael NedelcovychAnalyst, TD Cowen
  • Michael LifetonAnalyst, Jefferies
  • Seamus FernandezAnalyst, Guggenheim
  • Thibault BoutherinAnalyst, Morgan Stanley
  • Florence SperdesAnalyst, Bernstein
  • Matthias HartblomAnalyst, Handelsbanken

Full transcript

Analyst questions are marked with a bar. Timestamps are into the recording.

Prepared remarks

00:00

Unidentified ManagementInvestor Relations

And welcome to this conference call regarding the agreement to acquire a cure of therapeutics that we announced earlier today. My name is Jakob Rode, and I'm the head of investor relations at NOVO NORDISK. And with me today I have CEO of NOVO NORDISK, Mike Duster, Executive Vice President, Product and Portfolio Strategy, Ludovic Helfgott, Executive Vice President, Research and Development, and Chief Scientific Officer, Martin Holst Lange.

All speakers will be available for the Q&A. Today's announcement is available at our website, novonordis. com. Please note that the call is being webcasted and a recording will be made available on our website. The call is scheduled to last for approximately 30 minutes. Today's presentation, lasting for around 10 minutes, will be followed by a Q&A session where I kindly remind you that the focus of the call today is on the agreement to acquire a care of therapeutics. Next slide please.

Before I hand over to Mike, we need to advise you that this call will contain forward-looking statements. These are subject to risk and uncertainty that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. For further information on our forward-looking statements and risk factors, please see the company announcement for the first six months of 2025, which was released on August 6. And with that, over to you, Mike.

01:12

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thank you, Jakob. Please turn to the next slide. Earlier today, we announced that we have entered into an agreement to acquire Acuro Therapeutics. This is the largest research and development related acquisition in the history of NOVO NORDISK, reflecting the strong strategic and scientific fit to our core areas within diabetes, obesity, and their associated core mobilities. The acquisition includes ICERO's late-stage MASH acid, ifroxyformin, or EFX. Over 80% of MASH patients are overweight or obese, making this indication especially relevant for the strategy and the purpose of our company.

NOVO NORDISK is no stranger to the MASH space. In August, we firmly established our presence in this obesity-related comorbidity with the U. S. approval of Vigobi for the treatment of MASH in adults with moderate to advanced fibrosis. As Lulu will tell you, while there has been advancement within the space, there are over 250 million people who are impacted by MASH globally, and therefore, plenty of work to do in developing innovative treatments. The combination of Acuro's robust R&D done to date with EFX, as well as NOVO NORDISK expertise in developing innovative medicines, including the deep knowledge of obesity-related comorbidities, makes this particular acquisition an exceptional fit. Integrating EFX into our portfolio supports NOVO NORDISK long-term strategy of developing innovative medicine and for treating millions of more people living with diabetes, obesity, and their associated comorbidities.

To further elaborate on the unmet need, as well as the commercial opportunity that this will bring, I would like to pass it to Ludovic.

03:07

Ludovic HelfgottExecutive Vice President, Product and Portfolio Strategy

Thank you very much, Mike, and please turn to the next slide. This is indeed an exciting day for NOVO NORDISK, CURO Therapeutics, and most importantly, for the millions of patients worldwide affected by MASH with limited treatment options.

MASH is a serious, progressive metabolic disease where advanced degrees of fibrosis are associated with poor outcomes and a high economic burden on the healthcare systems. As Mike noted, over 250 million people globally are affected by MASH, and prevalence is growing. The progression of disease is classified by stages of fibrosis from mild, F1, to a compensated cirrhosis, F4. Current available treatments, including Wigovi, treat those who fall within the F2 to F3 space. With around 20% of F3 patients advancing to F4 within two years, there is A very narrow window for these patients to receive effective disease modifying treatment. We're excited about the progress of FIGOV, the world's first GLP-1 receptor agonist approved for MASH. Yet, there remains a substantial unmet need for therapeutic interventions.

And this need is particularly pronounced for patients with S4 cirrhosis, where there are currently no treatments available. And there remains an opportunity as well to treat non-responders to the existing treatments in the F2 and the F3 stages. The frixisperamine is a potential means to that end. In addition to promising phase 2 data in the F2 to F3 segment, it is the only FGF21 analogue that has demonstrated fibrosis regression in the late stage A4 segment in a long phase 2 trial, which Martin will elaborate on shortly. We therefore believe that Efretisermine has the potential to become a leading treatment option within the treatment intensification segment of MASH, with efficacy anticipated to out-treat that of Incretins as monotherapy in late-stage fibrosis cases.

Overall, the MASH market is in early stages, and we aim to develop a portfolio spanning across the diseases stages of MASH. Now, Martin, I'll turn it over to you.

05:30

Martin Holst LangeExecutive Vice President, Research and Development, and Chief Scientific Officer

Thank you very much, Ludovic. Please turn to the next slide. As already alluded to by Mike and Ludovic, we're very pleased to announce the agreement to acquire Acuron and ephroxyfermin, a once-weekly subcutaneous long-acting FGF21 analog with potential to be not only first but also best in class in the F4 segment. Ephroxyfermin complements a strategic position in NOVO NORDISK MASH pipeline, with MASH being one of the most prevalent and underserved obesity-related comorbidities.

Ephroxyfermin has today demonstrated positive top-line Phase 2b results with a regression of fibrosis and MASH resolution in patients with F2 to F3 as well as F4.

Furthermore, Ephroxyfermin appeared to have a safe and well-tolerated profile in its Phase 2 program. The HARMONY Phase II trial evaluated the FROXID-FERMIN in an F2-F3 population, where 49% of patients achieved fibrosis improvement of at least one stage with no worsening of mesh, and 37% achieved mesh resolution without worsening of fibrosis. Over 96 weeks 29 of the F4 patients in the symmetry phase IIb trial achieved fibrosis improvement of at least one stage with no worsening of mesh In addition the trial showed that 42 of the F4 patients reached mesh resolution without worsening of fibrosis This marks efroxyfermin as the first and also only treatment to demonstrate statistically significant fibrosis regression in a F4 patient in a Phase II trial Please turn to the next slide.

The ongoing Phase III synchrony program is built upon the promising Phase IIb studies of afroxyfermin examining its effects across all mass stages. The first readout of synchrony real-world is anticipated as early as next year. This is expected to be followed by the pivotal synchrony histology trial in F2 and F3 in the coming years and synchrony outcomes for the F4 population around the turn of the decade. As a result, Afroxyfermin has the potential to be the first in class FGF121 analog targeting the F4 population, As well as play a role in F2 to F3 patients, including people who are not responsive to existing treatments.

We look forward to leveraging our capabilities to further optimize the synchrony program trials, assess the potential combinations with our current GLP-1 portfolio, explore opportunities for additional indications, and ultimately aim to bring the first pharmaceutical treatment to market in the F4 With that, I would like to hand it over to Mike for final remarks.

08:31

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thanks, Martin. Next slide, please. As we've mentioned throughout this call, the acquisition of Acero and its lead asset is a tremendous strategic fit to our current offering and portfolio, where NOVO NORDISK is uniquely positioned to unlock its full potential. MASH represents a patient segment that's closely linked with those of our core therapy areas. While it is one of the most prevalent comorbidities in obesity and diabetes, it is also one of the most underserved.

FGF21 agonists are emerging as the most promising non-incretin mechanisms of action in the clinical development within MASH. More importantly, afroxyformin is the only one to demonstrate reversal of fibrosis in the F4 stage, which represents the most challenging yet urgent disease segment to treat. On a personal note, this marks the first acquisition since I took over as a CEO of NOVO NORDISK. While many external factors are challenging us on a day-to-day basis, part of my job is to ensure the progress of our long-term aspiration of ensuring leadership in diabetes and obesity and their related co-morbidities. We can only do that by raising the innovation bar to bring innovative medicines to the market and thus impact millions of patients worldwide.

Today's acquisition further strengthens the possibility to do so, which I truly am excited about. And with that, back to you, Jaco.

Questions and answers

10:03

Unidentified ManagementInvestor Relations

Thanks a lot, Mike. Next slide, please. And with that, we're now ready for the Q&A session, where I kindly ask all participants to limit her or himself to one question. I remind that the focus of this call, including the Q&A session, is on the agreement to acquire a cure of therapeutics announced earlier today. And with that, operator, we're now ready to take the first question, please.

10:24

Thank you. To ask a question, you will need to press star one and one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one and one again. We will now go to the first question. And your first question today comes from the line of Harry Sefton from UBS. Please go ahead.

10:45

Harry SeigermanAnalyst, UBS

Brilliant. Thank you very much for taking my question. So clearly, this wasn't the only FGF21 asset for sale over the last couple of months. And you paid a bit of a premium to what we've seen with the others. So I wanted to get a sense from yourselves whether your own failure in FGF21 with Zalferman gave you any learnings that makes you confident in the potential differentiation for this asset versus Boston.

And 89Bio, or would you say that the premium that you've paid more simply reflects the de-risked opportunity in F4, and the fact that it's further ahead in development? Thank you.

11:32

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Hey, Harry, thanks a lot for that. I'll give that to you, Martin, on self-ferment learnings and the competitiveness of EFROXA-Ferman.

11:39

Martin Holst LangeExecutive Vice President, Research and Development, and Chief Scientific Officer

Absolutely, thank you very much. So first of all, Harry, I think you've heard at least me talk about from in the GLT-1 space, GLT-1 is not just a GLT-1. We see differences across the different offerings in the GLT-1 space. And based on our own learnings from San Fermin, we tend to see the same in FGS-21. So, as you know, we have discontinued our own internal program, and we saw a clear differentiation between that and the EFROXA-FERMIN, but we also tend to see a superior efficacy and potentially also safety tolerability profile with EFROXA-FERMIN compared to what we've seen out there so far. So we believe that with this acquisition we not only have what has the potential to invest in class, but also, and this is obviously a timing perspective, first in class because it is a more progressed program.

And to your point, then also somewhat more de-risked.

12:37

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thanks for that, Martin.

12:37

Harry SeigermanAnalyst, UBS

That's very clear. And also thank you to you, Harry, for dialing in for the question.

12:37

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

And with that, we are ready for the second set of questions, please.

12:46

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Simon Baker from Rothschild and Co Redburn. Please go ahead.

12:57

Simon BakerAnalyst, Rothschild & Co Redburn

Thank you very much for taking my question. It's kind of flipping Harry's question around that if one looks at consensus estimates for fluxifermin, And you've either got the bargain of the century or you have more measured expectations and assumptions for the role of afroxifirmin in MASH. So I just wonder if you could sort of talk us through qualitatively where you really see the opportunity here. You've obviously got some aglutide in F2, F3, afroxifirmin definitely in F4. But in your thinking and how you see the Acquero acquisition, where is the overlap and where do you really see afroxyfermin fitting in? Thanks so much.

13:45

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thank you for that question. I'll hand that to you, Ludo, on the complementarity to the portfolio.

13:50

Ludovic HelfgottExecutive Vice President, Product and Portfolio Strategy

Absolutely Thank you very much for the question I think the real objective here is to be able to cover a wide range of patients with MASH across the portfolio I think you rightly point out that semaglithides we believe has the best data to date on F2 and F3 But we also know that two things are important in order to really complete the treatment of these patients First is the F4 and the absence of any alternative in the F4 but transplants, which we know have a huge burden on the patient but also on the healthcare system. So there's definitely here the core of the value proposition. I would also say that you have some patients in F2 and maybe even more in F3 that are either poorer responders to the incretin world or that are fast progressors.

And these patients need a treatment as well. So if you sum up the essence data that was shown by Wegovy and MASH, and the data that could be shown here with the chiro-flex firming compound in this subpopulations of F2, F3 that are either non-responding as much as we want to in Cretins, or fast progressives, and the core of it, the FC, you can clearly see the continuum of patients being covered. That's where we believe we can make a difference by this portfolio play. Thank you so much.

15:10

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thank you, Ludovic, and Martin briefly adding a few comments.

15:13

Martin Holst LangeExecutive Vice President, Research and Development, and Chief Scientific Officer

Yeah, I think it's important to add that we have data from the ephroxyfermin phase 2B trials where a number of patients, one-third of patients, were on a baseline GLP-1 treatment that we see added effect when ephroxyfermin is introduced, so suggesting additivity in this space, which obviously excites us a lot.

15:37

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thank you, Martin. And also thank you to you, Simon. Then let's go to the third question, please.

15:45

Thank you. Your next question comes from Pete Fadol from BNP Paribas. Please go ahead.

15:53

Pete FadolAnalyst, BNP Paribas

Yeah, thank you, Pete Fadol from BNP Paribas. Just the one question, and thanks for the call. To Mike Nurek or Martin, just my question is on the future development plans. Is there any rationale How to open new studies exploring the combination of GLP-1 and FGF-21 in either of the F2, F3, F4 segments, and could that start before EFX gets approved? And I think, Martin, you hinted at taking FGF beyond MASH, so any further comments there would be appreciated. Thank you.

16:22

Martin Holst LangeExecutive Vice President, Research and Development, and Chief Scientific Officer

Yeah, thanks very much, Pete. I think I've alluded to both. We have early data suggesting that combining GLP-1 and FGF2N1 potentially is additive in terms of efficacy, and we will definitely explore that. We will also get some data out of the ongoing trials as a number of patients already aren't GLP-1s in those trials. But specifically, obviously, we want to leverage the full portfolio of what we do.

There is already an ongoing trial, and you can actually see that in ALP, and we are currently exploring potentially additional indications, but I don't want to go into that at this point in time.

17:12

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thank you, Martin. And thank you to you, please. Let's move on to the next question, please.

17:18

Thank you. Your next question comes from Evan Zeigerman from BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

17:25

Connor McKayAnalyst, BMO Capital Markets

Hi there. This is Connor McKay on for Evan. Thanks for taking our question. I guess maybe two quick ones from us. Maybe sticking with the theme of MASH, is there any early feedback you can share on the recent launch and approval of Wagovi in MASH? And kind of building on sort of that offering, how you're thinking about positioning of Vigovie versus Akira's asset in that indication. And then sort of secondarily, following today's deal, what would be your appetite to do additional deals? And kind of what would those look like in terms of deal size and therapeutic area focus? Thank you.

18:00

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thank you for those, Connor. On the first one with Vigovie uptake in Mesh in the U. S. , it's still early days. And for an update on that, we'll revert after the Q3 call. For the topic of this call, we'll turn to Akira and we'll turn to Ludo on potential for future deals.

18:14

Ludovic HelfgottExecutive Vice President, Product and Portfolio Strategy

Absolutely. I think that Mike said it early on. We are committed to help patients with diabetes, obesity, and their comorbidities. And as long as you see comorbidities with a strong overlap with the core patient populations we're targeting in diabetes and obesity, we'll of course be open to deals. If they are innovative, if they really change the games, if you really have the potential to have a leader in the market. So there's absolutely willingness to continue being in the forefront of the race to innovation, both internally and externally, and in obesity, diabetes, and their associated co-mobility.

18:52

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

That's very clear, Ludo, investments in innovation. Thanks a lot, Connor, and let's move to the next question, please.

18:57

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Mike Nudelkovic from TD Cowan. Please go ahead.

19:06

Michael NedelcovychAnalyst, TD Cowen

Hi, thank you for the question. My question is on the broader competitive landscape. We're not too far away from some late phase readouts of incretins that incorporate glucagon receptor agonism in MASH. So I'm curious how you think FGF21 plus or minus GLP1 will ultimately stack up against an incretin that incorporates glucagon receptor agonism across the different fibrosis stages. Thank you.

19:32

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thanks a lot, Mike. Martin, on different mode of actions with the mesh, I'll turn to you.

19:37

Martin Holst LangeExecutive Vice President, Research and Development, and Chief Scientific Officer

Thank you very much. So I think it's clear, given the glucagon mechanism of action, we expect to see an impact on steatosis. Exactly how that will read out in fibrosis and outcomes, I think it's too early to say. We are obviously also curious to look at the safety and tolerability profile. I think vis-à-vis potential combination, but also to be honest, in monotherapy FGH21 or FGH21 plus GFP1, we do believe that there is a potential to be best in class as we communicate it, and this is why we strongly pursue these combinations.

20:15

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thank you, Martin. Very clear. And let's move to the next question, please. Thank you also to you, Mike, for the question. Let's move to the next question, please.

20:24

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Michael Lifeton from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

20:31

Michael LifetonAnalyst, Jefferies

Thank you very much. Two questions, please. Could you please comment on your IP assumptions around the protection for EFX? And then secondly, on manufacturing, EFX is made in E. coli. I don't believe that's one of your existing capabilities. Just how do we think about investments into capacity? Thank you.

20:50

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thanks for those Mike Stretching your luck with two questions but on those I turn to you Ludo on IP first We can share too much but on IP and then on manufacturing On this one we not sharing On the operating manufacturing side you very right it is not in the platforms but we do not expect to have any capex investment from that perspective We believe in the market today, players with which we could work and CMOS with which we could transact in order to make sure to get the product to patients. But we are not forecasting any capex on the Ecoli platform. Absolutely. So that's a capacity and nothing on IP concerns. So thanks for that, Michael.

And let's move to the next question, please.

21:35

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Seamus Fernandez from Guggenheim. Please go ahead.

21:42

Seamus FernandezAnalyst, Guggenheim

Great. Thanks for the question. So, I wanted to just clarify the definition of F4 for the CBR, or at least the approval dynamics in the CBR itself. Is that an accelerated approval by 2031 for compensated cirrhosis, or is it a full approval that's required? And can you just remind us what the requirements are at FDA for accelerated approval in F2, F3 versus full approval? And then maybe you can just remind us what you think or what's encompassed in the CVR in that regard. Thanks so much.

22:29

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thanks a lot. I think on the CVR, we don't go into specific details. You were right on the data indication tiering, and I think maybe I'll turn to you, Martin, to speak about the synchrony trial in F4 overall.

22:42

Martin Holst LangeExecutive Vice President, Research and Development, and Chief Scientific Officer

Yeah, so you're right. As you know, the FDA has a setup, and we know that also from F2 and F3, and we are currently following that setup in F2 and F3 also for the ESMIS trial for WIGOE, where we get a, so to speak, conditional approval or accelerated approval based on histology, that's fibrosis and steatosis. But then you have to also generate outcomes data that's a composite of liver-related endpoints, liver-related death, and CV death. And that's where you see these longer studies.

23:29

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thanks a lot, Martin, and thank you also to you, Seamus. And let's move to the next question, please.

23:34

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Thibaut Botherin from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

23:42

Thibault BoutherinAnalyst, Morgan Stanley

Yeah, thank you very much. Just a question on the co-formulation or potential for co-formulation of EFX and semaglutide. Is that something you're interested in? Do you see any technical challenge in doing that? And could it be done with something simple like a bridging study?

23:59

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thanks a lot, Thibault, and for that I'll give it to you, Martin.

24:07

Martin Holst LangeExecutive Vice President, Research and Development, and Chief Scientific Officer

Yes, thank you very much. Very relevant question, but too early for us to speculate in. Sorry.

24:13

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thanks a lot, Thibault, and let's move to the next question, please.

24:17

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Florence Sperdes from Bernstein. Please go ahead.

24:23

Florence SperdesAnalyst, Bernstein

Thank you very much for taking my question. A quick one on the financial aspects. Maybe could you give us a little bit more color on how do you see the impact of this acquisition in the coming years? Is it fair to assume that we should have a kind of low single-digit dilutive impact on earnings in the coming years, if I'm referring to what you stated on the press release on the 3% impact on operating profit for next year? Thank you.

24:55

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thank you very much for the question. I would start by saying that first of all, this is an investment in our portfolio. It's something which is important for the future of our overall development of our franchise. And that should be maybe the leading thought when coming into that. If you look at 25, we're not expecting any change in the EOP for 25. We might have a minor cost in Q4 linked to the R&D line and the transition cost, but it's nearly nothing. In 2016, as you saw rightly, we're expecting a negative sort of minus 3% impact on the EOP growth driven by the increased R&D cost. This is really, again, an investment on the R&D cost for the phase three trials that Martin was alluding to earlier on.

So that's what we are right now planning.

25:51

Unidentified ManagementInvestor Relations

Thanks a lot. Thank you, R&D, investments in potential future growth. That's very clear. And thank you also to you, Florent. Then with that, I think we are ready for the last question, please.

26:05

Thank you. Your final question for today comes from the line of Matthias Hartblom from Handelsbanken. Please go ahead.

26:14

Matthias HartblomAnalyst, Handelsbanken

Thanks so much for taking my question. A question for Mike. So it's no more than two months since you took over as CEO. So how did the BD team have time to apply your strategic lens on how to allocate capital to business development in this short period of time? I guess said differently, how could you find confidence this was the best use of capital this early in your tenure? Thanks so much.

26:36

Mike DoustdarChief Executive Officer

Thanks very much, Matthias. So we have been looking at a number of assets for a long period of time. Things didn't start with me taking over as a CEO, but of course, it reflects the fact that, as Martin and Ludovic said, that we are continuously in the outlook for best-in-class and possibly first-in-class assets within our strategy. Today's announcement was a confirmation of what we have figured out, that we have actually something in our hands that we could be very proud of, hopefully help develop it, and bring it to the market. I think it's extremely exciting because it is an asset that not only will help millions and millions of patients very closely connected to the strategy and the leadership we would We'd like to sustain and grow, but also I think it's a very important building block for strengthening our top line as we get closer to the LOE of semaglutide.

So I'm super excited about today's news.

27:45

Unidentified ManagementInvestor Relations

Thanks a lot, Mike. That's very clear. And also thanks for the question. Then with that, we're ready to conclude the Q&A session. We'd like to thank you for calling in and participating. Thanks a lot and have a good day.

Other Novo Nordisk A S earnings calls

  • Q2 2026 earnings call

    Management framed growth as increasingly volume-led, while stressing price and access pressure, a rapid oral launch, and continued pipeline investment despite a failed cardiovascular trial.

    Aug 05, 2026Mildly positive0.25
  • Q4 2025 earnings call

    Management framed 2026 as a price-reset year, arguing lower prices are an investment in reach while acknowledging limited visibility on self-pay volume response.

    Aug 04, 2026Mildly positive0.10
  • shareholder call, June 6, 2026

    Management framed the event around accelerating pill adoption and a broad pipeline, arguing differentiation depends on efficacy, tolerability, and tailored development.

    Jun 07, 2026Confident0.72
  • Q1 2026 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as a launch-led opportunity, while emphasizing pricing pressure, continued investment, and execution risks across markets.

    May 06, 2026Not scoredn/a
  • FY 2026 earnings call

    Management framed the miss as a potentially biased open-label comparison, while defending CagriSema’s prospects through redesigned and higher-dose trials.

    Feb 23, 2026Cautious-0.25
  • Q3 2025 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as a strategic reset toward diabetes and obesity, with cost savings and broader access intended to restore competitiveness over time.

    Nov 05, 2025Cautious-0.20
  • Q2 2025 earnings call

    Management framed the outlook cut as a serious execution challenge, while incoming CEO Mike Doustdar emphasized sharper focus, faster execution and cost reallocation.

    Aug 06, 2025Cautious-0.15
  • FY 2025 earnings call

    Management framed the cut as a need for faster execution, with U.S. compounding and weaker-than-expected market growth driving the reset.

    Jul 29, 2025Cautious-0.35
  • Q1 2025 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter around strong underlying demand but said U.S. compounding forced a lower full-year outlook and a second-half commercial recovery plan.

    May 07, 2025Mildly positive0.25
  • Q3 2024 earnings call

    Management framed growth as supply-led scaling, while emphasizing strong clinical readouts and cautioning that 2025 growth may moderate on a higher base.

    Nov 06, 2024Positive0.58
  • Q2 2024 earnings call

    Management framed the first half as strong commercial execution and improving supply, while emphasizing patient access, capacity expansion and a faster second-half growth profile.

    Aug 07, 2024Positive0.57
  • Q1 2024 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as strong execution, with the raised outlook supported by obesity growth but still dependent on supply expansion.

    May 02, 2024Positive0.65
  • Q4 2023 earnings call

    Management framed 2024 as continued demand-led growth, with supply expansion and a resilient supply chain taking priority over maximizing near-term volume.

    Jan 31, 2024Confident0.76
  • Q3 2023 earnings call

    Management framed the call around rapid GLP-1-led growth, expanding capacity and evidence beyond weight loss, while stressing supply constraints and disciplined rollout.

    Date n/aConfident0.78
  • Q2 2023 earnings call

    Management framed strong demand and SELECT’s cardiovascular result as expanding semaglutide’s value, while emphasizing that supply and launch pace remain deliberately constrained.

    Date n/aConfident0.82
  • Q1 2023 earnings call

    Management framed growth as increasingly constrained by supply, while stressing sustained GLP-1 demand and investment to expand capacity.

    Date n/aConfident0.72
  • Q4 2022 earnings call

    Management framed 2023 around strong GLP-1 demand and capacity expansion, while stressing supply limits and unusually high uncertainty around market growth.

    Date n/aPositive0.65
  • Q3 2022 earnings call

    Management framed performance as broad-based, with GLP-1 demand driving growth while supply constraints and declining insulin sales shaped the outlook. 40% of U.S.

    Date n/aPositive0.65
  • Q2 2022 earnings call

    Management framed the raised outlook around accelerating GLP-1 demand, while emphasizing capacity expansion and continued investment to address supply constraints.

    Date n/aConfident0.72
  • Q1 2022 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as demand-led growth strong enough to raise the outlook, while stressing that supply capacity—not demand—would limit near-term GLP-1 sales.

    Date n/aConfident0.78
  • Q4 2021 earnings call

    Management framed 2022 as continued GLP-1-led growth, with obesity demand constrained by Wegovy supply and investment priorities weighing on margins. U.S.

    Date n/aPositive0.65
  • Q3 2021 earnings call

    Management framed results as broad-based, GLP-1-led growth, while stressing that 2021 was exceptional and that several temporary factors complicate 2022 comparisons.

    Date n/aConfident0.72
  • Q2 2021 earnings call

    Management framed the raised outlook as driven by obesity and GLP-1 momentum, while emphasizing launch investment and execution risks.

    Date n/aConfident0.70
  • Q1 2021 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as a strong start that lifted full-year expectations, while highlighting launch momentum and acknowledging pricing, competition, and COVID uncertainty.

    Date n/aConfident0.72

All Novo Nordisk A S transcripts

Done reading? Open Novo Nordisk A S with the chart, filings, and estimates next to this call.

About this transcript

The summary, guidance, analyst focus, and tone are automated and should be checked against the call before being relied on. Names and figures can be misheard. Listen to the replay.