Summary
Management framed the quarter as operationally strong but stressed affordability, rate volatility and elevated incentives as the key constraints on near-term demand and margins.
- September was the quarter’s strongest order month as rates fell, while October traffic and leads reached year highs before rates rose again.
- 7%7% incentives in Q3, up 70 basis points sequentially, exceeded expectations; management attributed the lower Q4 margin outlook primarily to incentives and mix.
- Active-adult closings were temporarily constrained by community closeouts, with replacement communities expected to open in 2025 and contribute closings in 2026.
Guidance
- 7,900 to 8,300 homes Q4 closings
- $565K$565,000 to $565,000 Q4 average sales price
- 27.5%27.5% to 27.8% Q4 gross margin
- 29%Approximately 29% full-year gross margin
- 9.2%9.2% to 9.5% full-year SGA expense, excluding insurance adjustments
- 24.5%24 to 24.5% Q4 tax rate, excluding incremental energy tax credits
- $5.2B$5.2 billion full-year land acquisition and development spend
- 950 average communities Q4
What analysts pressed on
- 01Q4 gross-margin decline: management cited richer incentives than expected and lower-margin Western mix, without quantifying each factor.
- 02Hurricane effects: management said Q4 guidance includes estimated delays but declined to quantify exact delivery impacts or 2025 spillover.
- 03Florida market and storm exposure: management remained bullish, citing strong Q3 performance and lower resale and new-inventory levels from peaks.
- 04Demand by buyer segment: entry-level buyers remain most affordability-constrained, move-up demand is strong, and active adults are sensitive to uncertainty.
- 05Incentive cadence: management saw no meaningful Q3 moderation and said sustained demand and improved rates could allow reductions.
- 06Entry-level incentive levels: management declined to break out incentives by buyer segment, calling that analysis too granular.
Notable disclosures
- 30%30% of Q3 buyers used the national rate program, while 58% of Q3 sales were spec homes.
- 114 days Q3 average cycle time, down from 123 days in Q2; management targets 110 days by year-end and 100 days early 2025.
- Active-adult communities are expected to open mostly in the second half of 2025, with closings beginning in 2026.
- 56%56% of lots under control were optioned; management expects roughly three to three and a half years to reach 70%.
Risks raised
- Affordability remains a hurdle, and management said buyers reacted noticeably to mortgage-rate movements.
- Elevated incentives are expected to persist through at least most of Q4, pressuring gross margin.
- Hurricanes caused work stoppages and power-related delays in Florida, with permitting and delivery timing still uncertain.
- Texas competition and price normalization in some markets, including Austin, remain areas of choppier conditions.
Tone: Positive 0.55
Management emphasized strong execution and confidence in its position, while acknowledging affordability pressures, elevated incentives and uncertain rate-sensitive demand.
Who spoke
Company
- Jim OssowskiInvestor Relations
- Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
- James OssowskiEVP & CFO
Analysts
- John LovalloAnalyst, UBS
- Unidentified AnalystAnalyst, Zelman and Associates
- Stephen KimAnalyst, Evercore ISI
- Anthony PettinariAnalyst, Citi
- Michael RehautAnalyst, JPMorgan
- Mike DahlAnalyst, RBC Capital Markets
- Carl ReichardtAnalyst, BTIG, LLC, Research Division
- Trevor AllinsonAnalyst, Wolfe Research
- Sam ReidAnalyst, Wells Fargo
- Matthew BouleyAnalyst, Barclays
Full transcript
Analyst questions are marked with a bar. Timestamps are into the recording.
Prepared remarks
Good morning. My name is Audra, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Paltai Group Inc. 3rd quarter 2024 earnings conference call. Today's conference is being recorded. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press the star key, followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one again. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Jim Zoomer. Please go ahead.
Jim OssowskiInvestor Relations
Thank you, Audra. Good morning. I want to welcome all participants to today's earnings call to review Paltai Group's operating and financial performance in the company's third quarter ended September 30, 2024. Here to review Paltai Group's Q-3 results, Ryan Marshall, President and CEO, Bob Buschana C, Executive Vice President CFO, and Jim Osowski, Senior Vice President and Finance. A copy of our earnings release on this morning's presentation slides have been posted to our corporate website at PaltaiGroup. com.
We will post an audio replay of this call later today. I want to alert everyone that today's presentation includes forward-looking statements about the company's expected future performance. Action results can differ materially in those suggested by our comments made today. The most significant risk factors that could affect future results are summarized as part of today's earnings release and within the company's presentation slides.
These risk factors and other key information are detailed on our ICC filings, including our annual and quarterly reports. Now, let me turn the call over Ryan Marshall.
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Thanks, Jim. I appreciate everyone joining our call this morning as we discuss another quarter of strong operating and financial results for Paltai Group. As detailed in this morning's press release, driven primarily by a 12% increase in closings, we reported a 16% year-over-year increase in third quarter earnings to $3.35 per share. Inclusive of our strong Q3 financial performance, for the first three quarters of 2024, Paltai Group has realized double-digit increases in closings, home sale revenues, and pre-tax income, along with a 22% increase in reported earnings to $10.28 per share. In addition to delivering significant growth in revenues and earnings for the trailing 12-month period, Paltai Group realized to return on equity of 27%, while continuing to drive strong cash flow and lowering our debt-to-capital ratio to 12%.
Our strong financial performance also allowed us to continue returning funds to shareholders. Through the first nine months of 2024, we returned $1 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. This is an increase of $200 million or 25% from last year in terms of funds allocated back to our investors. I think these numbers are all the more impressive, given the fluctuating backdrop that we've all been working through. Over the course of the year, we have seen the 30-year mortgage rates climb from 6.75% in January, 7.5% in April, only to fall back to 6% in September, and then of course a recent climb in interest rates back to 6.75% has the 30-year mortgage rate back to where we started 2024.
We track consumer sentiment among visitors to our website and our communities, and as you might expect, buyer confidence ebbs and flows with meaningful changes, or even just volatility in interest rates. This again proved to be the case as buyers reacted to the movement in rates during the third quarter. With mortgage rates hovering around 6.5% to begin the third quarter, buyers were generally less inclined to sign a purchase agreement. As interest rates declined through August and September, however, we experienced a noticeable pick up in overall activity. In fact, of the three months in the quarter, we generated the highest net two orders absorption cases in the month of September.
Driven by September's strong performance, the Q3 absorption pace of 2.4 orders per community per month was certainly above the typical pre-COVID numbers for the third quarter. The recent October has shown the highest web traffic, foot traffic, and lead volume of the year. However, the recent rise in interest rates has demonstrated a more typical seasonal selling pattern, and incentives have remained elevated as a consequence.
Between rate volatility, the impact of hurricanes, and the upcoming presidential election, I think the upcoming spring selling season will offer the best assessment of fundamental housing demand.
I think buyer reaction to the movement rates, both down and now up, again, affirms that affordability remains a tough hurdle to get over for many potential home buyers. The most recent S&P, Kay Shiller Index, shows home prices continue to hit all-time new highs, although the rate of appreciation has slowed, which in combination with expected lower mortgage rates could offer some relief to consumers going forward.
As has been discussed extensively over the past few years, one of the pressure points that continue to push home prices higher is the fact that after years of underbuilding, this country has a housing deficit estimated at several million homes. The Mortgage Bankers Association issued a useful graphic a few weeks ago that has shown on slide 15 in today's webcast slides.
The graph shows housing stock added by decades since the 1940s. Looking at the graph, you can clearly see the significant drop in production during the past 15 years. To make this point even clearer, we modified the MBA graph by overlaying the growth in U. S. population over the decades. What you see is that just since the 1960s, our country's population has almost doubled the just shy of 350 million people, while housing production has been flat to down over the decades.
Given the high costs of home ownership, rate buydowns remain a powerful incentive in helping consumers bridge the affordability gap. In the third quarter, approximately 30% of our home buyers access their national rate program. To take advantage of our national rate incentive, home buyers will typically need to close within 30 to 60 days of signing the contract. So it's important that we continue to have an inventory of homes and production. At the end of the third quarter, 43% of the homes and production were spucked. So we are well positioned to meet demand as we close out 2024.
Along with benefiting from having inventory available, we are also continuing to make progress in lowering our cycle times. For homes delivered in the third quarter, our average cycle time was 114 days down from 123 days in this year's second quarter. Cutting two weeks out of our production timeline is an important accomplishment. And it keeps us on track to reach our goal of 110 days by year end and be at 100 days in the first part of 2025.
In truth, most of our divisions are already operating at or close to our 100 day ideal target. Our reported average is higher due to a handful of divisions, primarily those with large multifamily business or cycle time to remain elevated.
In summary, operationally and financially, we accomplished a lot in the third quarter, and our well positioned to have 2024 be a record year for policy. Now, let me turn the call over to Bob for review of our third quarter results.
James OssowskiEVP & CFO
Thanks, Ryan. Good morning driven by strong closing volumes, our third quarter home sale revenues increased 12% over last year to $4.3 billion.
Our higher revenues in the period reflect the 12% increase in closing 7,924 homes. While our average sales price in the quarter of $548,000 is effectively unchanged for the prior year and the second quarter of this year. Average sales prices by fire group were also consistent with the prior year.
The mix of our closing to the third quarter was 40% first time, 39% move up and 21% active adults. In the third quarter of last year, the mix of closings was 38% first time, 37% move up and 25% active adults.
The slight decline in the percentage of closings from active adult buyers primarily reflects the timing of active adult community closeouts in 23 and 24. That we noted in our sign up commentary during our second quarter earnings call. We expect the normalization of contribution from our active adult consumers when replacement active adult communities begin opening in 2025.
Looking at our orders, net new orders in the third quarter totaled 7,031 homes, which is consistent with the 7,065 that two orders recorded in the third quarter of last year. It's worth noting that our average monthly absorption pace of 2.4 homes in the current quarter remains higher than our historic third quarter pre-COVID average, which was closer to 2.2 homes per month.
Within the quarter, we did see a positive impact on monthly orders and interest rates declined from July through September.
Compared with the prior year, Q3 orders decreased 3% for first time buyers, increased 6% for move up buyers, and decreased 5% for active adult buyers.
Consistent with our guide, we operated out of an average of 957 communities during the quarter, which is an increase of just under 4% compared with the third quarter of last year. Based on activity during the quarter, quarter end backlog was 12,089 homes with a value of $7.7 billion, which compares with the backlog of 13,547 homes with a value of $8.1 billion at the end of the third quarter last year.
During the quarter, we started approximately 7,800 homes, and ended the quarter with a total of 17,096 homes under construction. These numbers are consistent with Q3 of last year. At the end of the quarter, we had approximately 7,400 spec homes in production, of which 1,357 homes were complete. This represents about 1.4 finished specs per community, which is consistent with the second quarter of this year.
On a unit basis, 58% of our third quarter sales were spec sales, highlighting the importance of having inventory available to meet buyer demand. Buyer interest in spec production has been driven in part by our successfully use of mortgage incentives, which are most effective when the consumer expects to close quickly. As always, we will continue to closely monitor consumer preferences for any changes that mortgage rates continue to decline.
Based on the units we have under construction and their current stage of production, we currently expect to close between 7,900 and 8,300 homes in the fourth quarter. I would highlight that this keeps us on track to meet or slightly exceed our full year closing target of 31,000 homes.
Given the affordability challenges facing today's home buying consumers and evolving market dynamics and key cities in which we operate, our pricing strategy seeks to ensure we maintain a compelling offering to all consumers.
With that said, our average sales price in the third quarter was $548,000, which is consistent with our guide for average pricing to be in the range of $550,000.
Looking at the fourth quarter, we currently expect our average sales price to be in a higher range of $565,000 to $565,000. As we have discussed on prior calls, this is largely due to a higher percentage of our closing coming from our Western markets, where sales prices are above company average.
Our third quarter gross margin came in at a strong 28.8%. As we highlighted during our most recent earnings call, our margins in this quarter reflect an increasing percentage of our closing coming from our Western markets, which, relative to other parts of our business, has slightly lower margins. Our third quarter margins were also impacted by higher incentive costs incurred during the period. In sentences in the third quarter were 7%, which is a scheduled increase of 70 basis points from the second quarter of this year.
Even competitive market dynamics, higher incentives were needed to help ensure we continue to sell homes and turn our assets. As Ryan talked about, higher demand improved as interest rates declined in the third quarter, but overall market dynamics remain competitive. As such, we expect incentives to remain elevated for at least a majority.
Given the anticipated geographic and product mix of fourth quarter closings and the expected need to maintain higher incentives, we currently expect gross margin in the fourth quarter to be in the range of 27.5% to 27.8%. Based on our fourth quarter guide, our full year gross margin would amount to approximately 29%.
Continuing down the income statement, our reported SGA expense in the third quarter was $407 million for 9.4% of home sale revenues. This compares with prior your SGA expense of $353 million for 9.1% of home sale revenues.
Our third quarter SGA expense was in line with previous guidance and keeps us on track for SGA expense of 9.2% to 9.5% of home sale revenues for the full year. I would note that our full year guide excludes the impact of the insurance adjustments we recorded in the first and second quarter of the issue.
Our financial services operations reported another quarter of strong operating and financial results. The third quarter of pre-tax income increased 90% over last year to $55 million. For the quarter, our financial services operations benefited from increased volume driven by the higher closing volumes in our home building business in combination with approved capture rates. In addition, we experienced increased profitability, particularly in our mortgage operations due to improving market conditions driving higher market performance.
In total for the quarter, we reported pre-tax income of $906 million, which represents an increase of 7% over the third quarter of last year. Our tax expense for the quarter was $208 million, or an effective tax rate of 23%. Our effective tax rate for the quarter includes a $14 million benefit associated with the purchase of renewable energy tax credits completed in the quarter.
In the fourth quarter, we expect our tax rate to be in the range of 24 to 24.5%, excluding the impact of any potential incremental energy tax credit purchases.
Looking at the bottom line, our reported net income was $698 billion, $3.35 per share, representing increases of 9% and 16% respectively over the third quarter of last year. Earnings per share in the third quarter was calculated based on approximately 208 million diluted shares outstanding, which is down 5% for the prior year. The company continued to systematically executed share repurchase programs.
Consistent with our stated strategies, we continued to allocate incremental capital to the future growth of our home building platform. In the third quarter, we invested $1.4 billion in land acquisition development, which 56% was for the development of existing land assets.
On a year to date basis, we have invested $3.7 billion in land acquisition development, and now expect our full year spend to be in the range of $5.2 billion. As our land teams continue to do an exceptional job identifying and structuring land investments that meet our strict underwriting guidelines.
Inclusive of our land spend in the quarter, we ended the quarter with approximately 235,000 lots under control, of which 56% were held via options. We continue to make steady progress in increasing the percentage of our land that we control via options as we seek to drive greater balance sheet efficiency and support of higher returns in the future. A federal land pipeline in the expected timing of community openings and closing, we currently expect to operate out of an average of 950 communities in the fourth quarter, which would represent an increase of 3% over the fourth quarter of last year.
In addition to investing in the ongoing growth of our businesses, we continue to consistently return capital to shareholders. In the third quarter, we repurchased 2.5 billion common shares that cost $320 million, for an average price of $126.05 per share. Through the first nine months of the year, we have repurchased 7.6 million shares, or approximately 4% of our shares outstanding at the beginning of the year, that cost of $880 million for $115.74 per share.
Following these repurchased, we ended the period with just over $1 billion remaining earnings, existing repurchased authorization. And finally, we ended the third quarter with a gross debt to capital ratio of 12.3%. Adjusting to the $1.5 billion cash on our balance sheet, our net debt to capital ratio was 1.4%.
Now, let me turn the call back to Ryan for some final comments.
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Thanks, Bob. A very proud of our organization as our local and national teams have done a great job navigating the ups and downs of 2024. Within such an environment, it's more important than ever that we continue to focus on the critical business strategies and tactics that have been instrumental to our success.
First, we are continuing to invest in our business. Underwriting to the same return hurdles and guidelines that we've had in place for more than a decade. Our discipline process has allowed us to assemble a robust pipeline of what we believe are well located in high returning projects. In the process of underwriting new deals, we continue our migration toward controlling more land via option.
This will be a multi-era effort that we see the opportunity for increasing our option lot count as a way to enhance returns and help mitigate market risk. We have a long term goal of getting to 70% option lots, which will be an evolutionary process as we work through our existing communities and add new option lot deals to the overall portfolio.
Second, while we continue to invest in new land positions, we have to make sure we are efficiently and intelligently turning our existing land assets. Within our business model, we seek to achieve high returns by balancing the desire to maximize profitability of each home while making sure we are turning our land assets. At the same time, we must be price competitive and offer a clear and compelling value to potential home buyers.
I think our third quarter results show this balancing act as we continue to generate historically high gross margins, that we meaningfully increase incentives in response to the more competitive market conditions in which we're currently operating. And third, we must continue to allocate capital in alignment with our long stated priorities. And just discussed, we continue to invest in the ongoing growth of our business through land acquisition and development.
If we achieve our 20, 24 land investment target of $5 billion, our five year land acquisition and development spend will total more than $20 billion. In a world where not in my backyard is alive and well, such investment represents countless hours of hard work to fire land teams throughout the country. After investing capital to support the ongoing growth of our business, we continue to systematically return funds to shareholders with 2024 being the fourth year in a row, in which we will have returned over $1 billion back to shareholders through Sherry purchases and dividends.
Over $20 billion invested in land, over $4 billion returned to shareholders and all while building a strong and highly supportive balance sheet with low leverage and high liquidity. I strongly believe this is a balance sheet that can support our growth plans, as well as continue to see us through the ups and downs of fire demand to inevitably roll through the housing industry. Looking close, I think in our entire organization for their hard work and delivering faulty groups outstanding operating and financial results.
Hurricanes made this effort even tougher over the past few months. But I am incredibly proud, although not at all surprised, of how our team rallied to support fellow employees directly impacted by these storms. Your compassion of the efforts are why faulty group remains a great place to work.
Now let me turn the call back to Jim.
Questions and answers
Jim OssowskiInvestor Relations
Thanks, Ryan. We're now prepared to open the call for questions. So we can get to as many questions as possible during the remaining time of this call. We ask that you limit yourself to one question and then we'll follow up. Thank you. And I'll now ask Arthur to again explain the process and open the call for questions.
Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you have dialed in and would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press star one again. And again, we ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow up to allow everyone an opportunity to ask a question. We'll go first to John LaValle at UBS.
John LovalloAnalyst, UBS
Good morning, guys. Thank you for taking my questions. The first one is maybe just help us on the sequential walk in gross margin from 28.8 in the third quarter to the range of 27.5 to 27.8 in the fourth quarter. You know, does that assume an incremental step up in incentives? And what is sort of the breakout between the headwind from incentives versus mix?
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Hey, John. I think it's, you know, reflective of the current market that we're operating in. You know, we highlighted in the commentary as it relates to Q3.
Coming into the quarter, we've given the guide and said that incentives would be flat. Obviously, they were a little bit richer than we had expected. We had a lot of homes to sell in the third quarter. You know, the activity that we have seen has had that higher incentive load. We still have homes to sell in the fourth quarter.
So it really is just a function of what we're seeing on the ground today. You know, another thing more broadly, the impact this is. You know, the slight step down in the active adult as a percentage of the mix. And so we're, you know, we highlighted during the second quarter that we saw some close outs. And so we've got some for lack of network gap outs and active adult. So you've seen the percentage of our total business active adult shrink a couple of basis points.
That obviously has the highest margin contribution. So it's the combination of all those factors.
John LovalloAnalyst, UBS
Understood. Okay. And then Ryan mentioned, you know, the hurricanes. Obviously there were two pretty devastating storms. Milton really hitting Florida pretty hard and Helene going up, you know, into the Carolinas. What is the impact that you guys perhaps saw in the quarter and that, you know, what are you kind of contemplating as we move forward here as a potential impact on, you know, whether it's deliveries orders or whatever the case may be.
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Yeah, John, it's Ryan, you know, first thoughts and prayers go out to the communities and the individual families who were impacted by the storms. They were certainly both very large and devastating in different ways.
I maybe start first by highlighting how well our communities performed both our communities that are in active construction as well as homes that we've recently closed. The, you know, the new construction standards and the quality that we built to the way drainage systems are designed, I think a real testament to just how effective some of those standards are. So we had very little damage in our active communities, which is good news.
The biggest impact is really two things, John, one loss of time. So the three to four days to shut jobs sites down in advance of the storm and then the three to four days kind of following the storms with cleanup. Those are days that are just hard to get back. Power is the second issue, so especially with Milton, the power outages were really widespread in Florida. Especially in the Tampa and Southwest Florida areas.
So, you know, power crews are focused on bringing the power grids back online. They're not as focused on setting new electrical meters for homes that will delivered in Q four. So we're still kind of working to quantify what those exact numbers are. We're confident in the guide that we've the Bob's provided to you.
And, you know, we'll know more, I think, in the coming weeks as the power companies recover. You know, the other maybe kind of third tier item would be some of the municipalities will be a little slower and responding to inspections.
You know, as they're dealing with kind of cleanup areas in the heartache communities.
John LovalloAnalyst, UBS
Great. Thanks very much, guys.
We'll move next to Alan Ratner at Zelman and Associates.
Unidentified AnalystAnalyst, Zelman and Associates
Hey, guys. Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. Hey, Ryan, just following up on the margin guide, you know, you mentioned the mix of the business, the active adults, et cetera. And you kind of touched on the storms, but I guess this is kind of like a two part question specific to Florida. You know, your margins in Florida are, you know, well above company average. So I'm curious if that's impacting specifically the four Q numbers specifically for the guidance, but kind of more importantly, I guess if you could just talk a little bit about what you are seeing in Florida outside of the storm impact, you know, there's a lot of concern about rising resell inventory in the market, challenged affordability.
And I'm just curious how you guys are thinking about that market, you know, relative to your very strong margins. Do you think there's an opportunity maybe to take advantage of that with, you know, taking share, maybe more incentivizing? Or do you feel like your land position in that that market is so strong that you're, you know, as you mentioned, not looking to give away those locks.
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Yeah, Alan, we're actually, you know, we remain very bullish on Florida. We talked about it a little bit in the, at the end of our second quarter. And, you know, on a positive note, we had a great third quarter out of Florida. In a lot of the inventory trends, both on resale inventory and new inventory of improved and they're down from where things peak. So I think that's a positive in a quarter, which is typically one of the slower quarters in Florida is, you know, the nicer, you know, the nicer weather, summer months up north.
As we move into the fourth quarter and we get into what is the traditional shoulder season in Florida, where the snowbirds start coming back into town. You know, I think we're well positioned to have a pretty good fourth quarter. So we're in every major city or almost every major city in Florida. We don't do a lot of business in Miami.
But we're, you know, our brands are really strong there. We got great communities. So I think Florida will continue to be a positive for us.
James OssowskiEVP & CFO
Yeah, Alan, you know, it's interesting to heard Brian say how well our markets held up there. So we don't see a mix shift in the fourth quarter pending, of course, the municipality's ability to actually deliver permits, which you think they will. And we think we'll be able to work through, you know, we had highlighted more of the geography in the margin is really that Western markets have on a relative basis, slightly lower margins for us. And that's going to be a higher percentage in the fourth quarter than it was the third.
And then it's the incentives on the spec for entry level. Probably that have more influence. And as we highlighted in the prepare for marks, our expectation is that. You know, the incentive levels are going to stay high.
Unidentified AnalystAnalyst, Zelman and Associates
Got it. That's helpful Bob. And you kind of touched on you mentioned entry level higher incentive. I guess more broadly, you know, you guys are one of the most diversified builders from a price point perspective. Can you just drill in a little bit in terms of what you're seeing at the various segments in terms of demand right now between entry move up and active adult.
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
I know you give the numbers on orders, but that doesn't always tell the whole story given, you know, community count openings and closings, etc. Yeah, Alan, I'll take that one. I mentioned that my prepared remarks in October. And we talked about it on prior calls. We do a survey with buyers to come to our website just about how confident they are about now being a good time to buy.
We're at a 12 month high in that number. So I think that's that's generally, you know, a positive sign for the business. Our website traffic or lead traffic and our foot traffic into our stores also at 12 month high. So, you know, there's a lot of real positive activity in the top of the funnel. And September was the best month in the quarter drilling down into the individual brands.
The entry level buyer continues to be most challenged by affordability. So when rates came down in September, I think we saw, you know, a nice pickup in buying power that had a very favorable impact to that particular buyer. So I think that's a positive. The move on fire continues to be really strong for us. And with that being 40% of our business, I think, you know, we're really well positioned for that consumer group to continue to perform well in the current environment. And if we're fortunate enough to see some improved rates in the, you know, the next couple of months as we go into spring selling season, I think, you know, that that particular buyer group will perform very well.
And then active adult. And we've talked about this in years past. This is a buyer group that's probably most impacted by volatility in the market and uncertainty in the market. And right now the thing that we're hearing the most about is the election.
And there's just, there's a lot of uncertainty around, you know, the nonstop garage that we're getting with the election in a couple of weeks. So we're, we're kind of waiting for the next couple of weeks to be over. And we think that buyer will come back into the market shortly thereafter.
Unidentified AnalystAnalyst, Zelman and Associates
Appreciate it.
Thanks, Lockett. And we'll go next to Stephen Kim at Evercore ISI.
Stephen KimAnalyst, Evercore ISI
Yeah, thanks very much guys. Appreciate all the information so far. I wanted to focus specifically on timing. I think you made a couple of comments about what you think may happen, you know, next year. I think you indicated that you thought that given the sort of the volatility and buyer demand due to rates that maybe we're really going to have to look to the spring selling season to sort of see how the market is ultimately going to settle out. And I think you're right on that. I think that the spring selling season is going to be a big focus probably for investors as well.
And so I'm just trying to get a sense for how you might see timing of certain things you've talked about evolve here over the net, what it means for timing, I guess I should say. So first of all, you talked about the hurricane impact. You think that some of the delays that you felt from that will impact fully for you. You think that there's going to be any spillover into one queue, particularly as it relates to deliveries, you know, the revenues, you talked about the timing of the active adult gap out. I think you indicated that you thought that that would, you know, get better in 2025. Can you give us a sense for sort of when in 2025?
And when in particular that might affect like revenues because, you know, obviously these homes may take a while to build. Those are the two major ones that I want to understand better, what you're thinking about from a timing perspective.
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Yes, Stephen, it's Ryan. Thanks for the question. You know, we've given a, we've given a guide for Q4 that we're confident in. So we think we've factored in kind of our best estimate of what the hurricane related delays and impacts will be. You know, things go quicker and better than expected. You know, potentially, you know, we get a few more closings in the fourth quarter. But we're confident in the guide that we've given.
Then as it relates to kind of 2025 and spillover impact from the hurricane, we haven't given a guide at this point. We'll do that at the end of the next quarter.
You know, history is a guide. I think, you know, the system will come back online. And, you know, other than again, power related. Setting of transformers and energizing communities, you know, those are the things that I think we sometimes see some delays around.
But, you know, we'll, we'll, you know, tell you more about that as we get closer as it relates to kind of active adult. Will, you know, we'll also give you our community count guide next year. The those communities have been in the pipeline for a long time. They're actively being developed right now. So we've got create visibility to when they're going to open. And most of those will start to open in the back half of 25 and then start to show closings in 2026.
But, you know, we haven't, we haven't given a guide for 2025. Other than, you know, I would, you know, reiterate, we've talked about kind of our long term growth guide of wanting to operate the business in a 5 to 10% growth window.
Stephen KimAnalyst, Evercore ISI
And if we look just staying on the active adult side a little bit sounds like 2024, most of 24, you know, had maybe a richer mix of active adult than we're going to have in 2025.
And just, and then it will, sounds like it'll become a little richer again. When you're thinking about managing the business over the long term, Ryan, which is more typical of what you're, you think that the, you know, the product mix, particularly I'm speaking about active adult is likely to be for your company. Are you managing it with the land that you're sort of purchasing today? Are you managing it to more like a mix of 2024 or more of a mix of 2025?
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Yeah, Stephen, we're, we're still running the company and managing the land mix for it to be 25 about 25% of the business. So the current mix in 24 is actually on the light side. And as these new communities where we're in a little bit of a gap out as those come online in 2025, you'll actually then Bob mentioned in his prepared remarks. You'll see the mix go back to our kind of typical contribution levels, which is in that 20 roughly 25% overall overall overall business.
Stephen KimAnalyst, Evercore ISI
Gotcha. It certainly is a relates to orders. Okay, I gotcha. That's a, that's helpful. Thanks very much guys.
We'll go next to Anthony Petanari at City.
Anthony PettinariAnalyst, Citi
Good morning. I was wondering if you could talk about sticking brick costs in the quarter and then assumptions for 4Q. And it seems like lumber may have been kind of a good guy for, for part of this year on a year of your basis, but it's kind of picked up recently. I'm just wondering if you could remind us your lag on lumber prices and any, any thoughts there.
James OssowskiEVP & CFO
Thanks for the question. I'm just going to talk a little bit about what we're going to do is consistent with the last three quarters and actually consistent with a third quarter of last year. So when we look at it for the full year, we expect kind of a very low single digit inflation on our vertical cost. And days it relates to lumber. It varies by market. Most of our lumber we buy on a 13 week trailing random length average.
You know, it effectively helps lock in the margin at the time of contract with the customer so that we're not experiencing.
You know, margin volatility during the bill process.
Anthony PettinariAnalyst, Citi
Got it. Got it. Thank you. And then just falling up on resale inventories. Ryan, I think you indicated inventories were kind of maybe getting a little bit better or normalizing a bit compared to three months ago in Florida. And I was just wondering if there were other markets, you know, Texas or out West where resale inventories are a little bit elevated or conversely where, you know, markets where inventories feel tight.
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Yeah, I wouldn't highlight any other markets in terms of kind of inventory issues. You mentioned Texas, Texas is a market that's been a little choppier in the last few months. It's, you know, it's a place where there's probably more competition. Every major builder is in every market in Texas. So, you know, and there were a few markets there, Austin's one I highlight that had unprecedented price appreciation that there were really high paying jobs when they're post COVID with a lot of relocations and there were short inventories. So we saw maybe, you know, less than, less than kind of moderated pace around price appreciation. So I think there's a few markets there that are probably still going through some price normalization.
You know, those are markets that I think will continue to farewell. There's good jobs there. Taxes are relatively affordable in our places where people want to be. So we're still confident our Texas markets as well.
Anthony PettinariAnalyst, Citi
Okay. That's helpful. I'll turn it over.
We'll take our next question from Michael Rehout, a JP Morgan. And Michael, your line is open. You may have yourself muted.
Michael RehautAnalyst, JPMorgan
Yep. Thank you. Thanks everyone. Good morning. Wanted to circle back a little bit to, you know, the cadence of incentives during the quarter. I think you broadly kind of described incentives as having remained elevated throughout the quarter you expected to remain elevated into the fourth quarter. I was curious on where incentives began.
Three Q and where it ended. And, you know, if there was any decline in incentives in September, as you said, you had a particularly strong demand.
James OssowskiEVP & CFO
Yeah, Mike, I think you can see from the guide that we've given and we've suggested we've told you we see elevated incentives continuing. We didn't really see those mitigates during the quarter. And it's worth highlighting, you know, the rate that we're offering is below market already. And so, you know, the movement in the 30 year doesn't really influence us as much as what do we need to do both competitively.
And from the affordability construct for the, for the consumer. So, you know, if you see a 25 basis point move in the 30 year, you know, we're already a hundred plus inside that with our incentive programs. And so what we're telling you is that the consumer needs to help with the affordability and the incentives is the way we're getting there.
Michael RehautAnalyst, JPMorgan
Right. I guess, you know, what I'm getting at is, you know, typically when you do see an increase in demand, maybe it's not the initial reaction, but over, let's say, several months. I believe it is kind of normal to see incentives start to take down at that overall higher level of demand kind of works through some curious that that's really what I'm more curious about. Maybe if it's not the first first month of a reaction given that you said it was really more concentrated in September in terms of the improvement in demand. If, you know, that were to have been more sustained over the following month. If you would normally see that, I think what I would characterize as a typical decline in incentives, at least for the move up buyers, perhaps which aren't helped as much by that rate by down.
That's what I'm more curious about, I guess.
James OssowskiEVP & CFO
Yeah, we'll have to see. I think is the answer to that. You know, we rates tick back up, right. So at the end of the day, we'll see, you know, if the fed continues down a path to reduce interest rates and you have Ryan said it is prepared comments. We think that, you know, the selling season is going to be a better indicator of overall demand.
And to your point, if the rate environment improves and demand is strong, yeah, I think we'd have an opportunity to reduce our incentive.
Michael RehautAnalyst, JPMorgan
Right. Secondly, just on from a regional perspective, you've kind of highlighted the inventory dynamics in Florida and Texas. I'm curious also for those markets, relative to the rest of your markets, if you've seen an increase in incentives in those markets, just given all the hype around, you know, resale inventory levels. If you've seen a significant or unusual increase in incentives in those markets, let's say. Kade versus six months ago.
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Yeah, Texas Mike is, you know, the market that I would tell you has probably been more competitive just because of the number of competitors that are there. I don't, you know, it's nothing that I would suggest is that it wouldn't suggest anything we've done is out of line. Or is, you know, on the level of making is uncomfortable, but, you know, probably higher incentives in the Texas markets than what we saw earlier in the year.
You know, I think Bob, you know, just indicated we'll see what the fourth quarter kind of provides is, you know, possibly we see some reduction in interest rates and that may give us the opportunity to back off of the incentives a little bit.
Michael RehautAnalyst, JPMorgan
Right. Thanks so much.
We'll go next to Nick Dall at RBC capital markets.
Mike DahlAnalyst, RBC Capital Markets
Thanks for taking my questions. I'm going to stick with margin dynamics. So Bob, I think last quarter when you got it to kind of sequential step down and margins in three Q and four Q relative to two Q, you already anticipated the mix dynamic. So is the mix even different and more of a headwind in four Q and you originally anticipated or is the right way to think about the sequential and four Q gross margin really?
James OssowskiEVP & CFO
Yeah, you already, you've highlighted the mix. That's what it is, but the delta versus your prior diet is really the incentive. Well, yeah, on balance, it's, you know, not changing dramatically. We've got a little bit more Western market business. Again, the strength there on a relative basis. It really relates to the incentives or as we've highlighted a couple of times now, you know, it's a challenging affordability equation and we're looking to meet it so that we turn our assets.
Mike DahlAnalyst, RBC Capital Markets
That makes sense. And the follow up is really with drilling down on on incentives. If you can provide a little more color, you talk about the 7% on total incentives load and that's 70. That's sequentially in the commentary. It seems like it's suggested it's really that the incremental change may have been predominantly on entry level. Can you help us quantify of what the incentives on entry level are or were in three Q and in your four Q guide and maybe. How that compares quarter on quarter.
James OssowskiEVP & CFO
Yeah, that's probably slice of the little too thin. Again, affordability is a challenge for all of our consumers. You know, the entry level feels it first and the most. And so it's going to be a little bit richer for them, but I wouldn't want to parse it quite that thinly.
Mike DahlAnalyst, RBC Capital Markets
Got it. Okay. Thank you.
We'll go next to Carl Reichert at PTIG.
Carl ReichardtAnalyst, BTIG, LLC, Research Division
Thanks. That guy. Nice to talk to you. I want to go back to Florida again, sort of bigger picture and longer term. So obviously there's been some talk about intermediate term migration patterns changing there, whether that's the frequency of weather or insurance conditions, high prices. So if you're thinking about investing capital, say in 27 or beyond in new deals there, do these dynamics impact your thinking, especially given those markets are competitive too as you're talking about Texas? Do you require a higher rate of return to invest there? How do you think about sort of beyond the very intermediate term, the short term, terms of where you place capital regionally?
If you think these dynamics in Florida might be changing, or are you sticking with it?
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Yeah, Carl, thanks for the question. Florida has been very good to our business. We do have a lot of capital invested there today. So, you know, for what it's worth, we'd like to continue to see Florida perform well. You know, for the investments that we've already made in the capital, it's already been committed as it relates to future stuff. You know, I think we'll take inputs as they come from the market. We're not going to blindly, you know, continue to go after things if we're seeing a change in a part of conditions. I think that's one of the disciplines that we have in our underwriting criteria.
I still remain really bullish on Florida. In fact, you know, you look at the parts of Florida where we're investing.
They're, you know, they're a little more inland. They're on higher ground. They're not places that are being impacted by the things that you see on TV.
You know, some of the things that you see on TV are, you know, the things that are right on the beach. They're the coastal areas. Their homes that were built in the 70s and 80s, not up to current code. It's devastating. It's terrible. I don't think anybody would want it to happen.
But, you know, my sense is our business is not probably directly impacted by some of the things that you're seeing on TV. I'd highlight that some of the moves that you're seeing are kind of within Florida. So they're in intra Florida moves as opposed to out of Florida moves. You know, Florida remains a place that's got great quality of life.
You know, maybe it's not as, you know, favorable of a deal as it used to be, but still relatively affordable. There's good jobs there. There's no state income taxes. So there are some offsets to some of the things like rising insurance rates and the like.
Carl ReichardtAnalyst, BTIG, LLC, Research Division
Thanks. I appreciate that. And then my second question is on off balance sheet. 56% off balance sheet now or option lots and the 70% of the goal. Is it still your intention to bridge that gap via effective land banking as opposed to a safe farmer options? And what are you seeing right now in the land banking market in terms of pricing terms? Have the negotiations, the discussions you've had with the large bankers kind of gone as you expected? Or are you seeing challenges there that you didn't expect? Thanks, guys.
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Yeah, Carl, we're making nice progress on our land options, you know, up to 56% in the quarter. You know, we've highlighted it'll be a journey. We think it'll probably take somewhere around three, you know, three to three and a half years in total as we cycle through our land portfolio to create up to the 70% level. But, you know, we're clicking off the milestones as intended.
So I'm really pleased with how our land teams are performing on that front. We'd expect 50% of our land to be with farmer options or land seller options. The other 20% that we're looking forward to the option will come from bankers. Our land banking team's done a really nice job building out a portfolio of bankers that we're working with. They're consistent, they're behaving in a very predictable way, and it's working out incredibly well for us.
You know, interest rates, you know, their money is tied to kind of what you see in the interest rate environment or broadly in the market. So, you know, we got a little bit of improvement on some stuff that we did in the third quarter. You know, we'll have to see how things go in the fourth quarter, depending on what happens with rates. But, you know, we're pleased with how land banking programs work.
Carl ReichardtAnalyst, BTIG, LLC, Research Division
Thanks, Ryan. Thanks, everybody.
We'll take our next question from Trevor Allenson at Wolf Research.
Trevor AllinsonAnalyst, Wolfe Research
Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. First, a question on conversion rates. You got talked about 5% to 10% growth annually. I think that included 2025. Just given where your backlog is trending, I think that would imply a pretty notable improvement in backlog conversion rate next year to grow closing to 5% or more. So, any commentary on is that where you're expecting an improvement in conversion rates? And then if so, maybe talk about the drivers of that, whether that be the improved cycle time that you guys referenced earlier, or any additional spec, any other drivers to call out.
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Yeah, Trevor, you know, backlog conversion rate is something that, you know, that's a number that can be impacted by two things. One cycle time, getting better or worse, you know, we indicated in the prepared remarks, our cycle times will continue to come down. So, we'll certainly get some benefit from that. And then the other piece is spec inventory by, you know, the definition, those homes that are in production that respect are not in backlog.
So, you know, a lot of those will sell and convert the same quarter and they won't show up in that metric. So, you know, I don't want to tell you how to run your models, but, you know, given the percentage of spec inventory that we're starting and selling. Given the current interest rate environment, I think probably a better metric is to look at homes in production, total homes in production as a good indicator of whether or not, you know, we have the available homes to deliver in the next year's closing volume.
Trevor AllinsonAnalyst, Wolfe Research
Okay, understood. And then I guess the second question that would be kind of following up on that finished inventory 1.4 finish spec for community. It's a little bit above your longer term target number of 1. Can you talk about how you feel about your current complete spec level and how you're thinking about spec production then moving forward?
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Yeah, in the current environment where we're selling in almost 40% of our business is coming through first time, which tends to be predominantly spec or mostly spec. And in the current interest rate environment, we actually want higher spec inventory as a percentage of whip. And when we had historically pre COVID operated that so the things that you've heard us most most recently talk about is being between 35 and 45% of total whip. And at the end of this most recent quarter, we're at 40, 42% of our total inventory is spec. So, we feel like we're riding line there on the finish side.
You know, when we were operating in more of a built order model, I think 1 per community was, you know, a pretty good number. And we're not abandoning that. We're slightly over that at 1.4, but we don't feel that we have any inventory exposure that's got us uncomfortable at this point.
You know, we're selling over 50% of the homes that we're selling right now are selling at some form of, you know, as a spec. So they're at some form of kind of production movement through the pipeline. So we feel pretty good. Feel pretty good there as well.
Trevor AllinsonAnalyst, Wolfe Research
Makes sense. Thank you. Thank my question. And good luck moving forward.
Next, we'll go to Sam Reed at Wells Fargo.
Sam ReidAnalyst, Wells Fargo
Awesome. Thanks so much. Last quarter. I want to say you guys mentioned that land costs were likely to trend up about high single digits in 2024. Just looking to confirm, you know, kind of how that trended in the third quarter was embedded in the fourth quarter guidance. And then I know you're not necessarily talking 2025 now, but you do have some visibility here. So just curious as to whether that's a reasonable assumption the next year.
James OssowskiEVP & CFO
Yeah, we, we did see high single digit. A lot cost increase in Q3. We do see that in Q4. We have not provided a guide for 25, you know, but we've said this before. Our lot costs haven't decreased in more than a decade, you know, land is more expensive. And as you cycle through older land, the stuff coming on is more expensive.
You know, we'll give some color as to what that means for 25 when we give our 25 guide.
Sam ReidAnalyst, Wells Fargo
Now, that's fair. And then, you know, just thinking to kind of help keeping questions and apologies that this was already covered, but just wanted to ask about options and law premiums as a percent of AFT. I want to say last quarter was around 104,000 and just curious what that was in Q3. And then perhaps what's embedded in guidance for the fourth quarter.
James OssowskiEVP & CFO
Yeah, we were 100 in Q3. So relatively consistent and that is embedded in our guide for Q4 as well. You know, worth it to highlight that, you know, a lot of that option revenue and law premium comes from our move up and active adult buyers. So you're at call it, you know, 60% of our business driving most of that.
And to further the comment that Ryan made earlier, that's not where we're doing most of the speculative building.
Sam ReidAnalyst, Wells Fargo
No, it makes sense. Thanks so much.
And we'll go next to Matthew Bui at Barclays.
Matthew BouleyAnalyst, Barclays
Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the questions back on that 5 to 10% growth that you kind of reiterated as the long term target. I'm wondering if, in fact, that is still the plan for 2025 specifically and kind of to what extent you're willing to flex around that growth target, maybe depending on where rates are or kind of general consumer demand is.
And any thoughts around if there's a margin or incentive trade off in your mind, you know, which you might kind of dial back that volume growth. Thank you.
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Yeah, Matt, we haven't given a 25 guide. We'll do that at the end of the next quarter. You know, the long term guide that we gave was meant to be that it was kind of a multi year guide of how we're positioning the business and investing in the land. So, you know, 25 specifically will tell you more next quarter.
Matthew BouleyAnalyst, Barclays
Okay, fair enough. And then maybe one on the balance sheet, just the, I think, the net debt, the cap of 1.4%. I'm curious if the kind of increase in land banking that you're targeting is actually playing into how you're managing the balance sheet here. If there is kind of a need to either hold on to more cash or kind of keep leverage low. So if that is playing into it at all, or just more generally, what would be your thoughts around kind of increasing that leverage back to prior levels. Thank you.
Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
Yeah, Matt, we talked about this a little bit. I think I'm prior calls and our view is we've got a view and how we're investing in the business, how we're growing the business. And that's driving what our capital leads are. We then look to what operating cash flow is. How much of the business investment strategy we can finance with our own cash and with the operating cash flow.
And then we go to kind of debt or, you know, other capital market mechanisms. I think, you know, the way to look at leverage is it's an outcome that's opposed to a being a driver.
Matthew BouleyAnalyst, Barclays
Bob, anything else you'd add there?
James OssowskiEVP & CFO
No other than the same terms of land banking specifically what what it is really going to do is free up cash. You know, as we increase the relative percentage of optionality, you know, our balance sheet relative basis gets smaller. So it'll give us more choices to Ryan's point about what to do with that. Cash.
Matthew BouleyAnalyst, Barclays
All right. Thanks guys. Good luck.
And that concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn the conference back over to Jim for closing remarks.
Jim OssowskiInvestor Relations
Appreciate everybody's time today. We're certainly available as the day goes on for any additional questions. We'll look forward to speaking with you on our portfolio call. Thank you.
And that concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Other PulteGroup earnings calls
- Q3 2026 earnings call
Management framed the quarter as a sharp late-period demand slowdown, prioritizing margins and disciplined capital allocation over chasing volume.
Oct 22, 2026Mildly positive0.18 - Q2 2026 earnings call
Management framed the quarter as evidence its strategy can grow orders while restoring built-to-order sales and reducing specs, despite uneven demand and affordability pressures.
Jul 22, 2026Positive0.55 - Q1 2026 earnings call
Management framed the quarter as resilient amid uncertainty, emphasizing disciplined starts, lower finished-spec inventory and a deliberate return to built-to-order sales.
Apr 23, 2026Positive0.55 - Q4 2025 earnings call
Management framed 2025 as a challenging but validating year for its diversified, disciplined model, while positioning 2026 around community growth and a gradual return to build-to-order sales.
Jan 29, 2026Mildly positive0.35 - Q3 2025 earnings call
Management framed resilient operations and disciplined starts as strengths, while emphasizing cautious buyers, elevated specs and a lower fourth-quarter margin outlook.
Oct 21, 2025Mildly positive0.15 - Q2 2025 earnings call
Management framed the quarter as evidence that diversification and disciplined inventory and land management can protect returns despite volatile, increasingly competitive demand.
Jul 22, 2025Mildly positive0.35 - Q1 2025 earnings call
Management framed the quarter as broadly in line with plans, while April volatility prompted a more cautious volume outlook and continued prioritization of price and margin.
Apr 22, 2025Mildly positive0.10 - Q4 2024 earnings call
Management framed 2025 as a return-focused year, prioritizing disciplined pricing and adjustable production over pursuing volume growth in a tougher affordability environment.
Jan 30, 2025Mildly positive0.25 - Q2 2024 earnings call
Management framed a strong first half as evidence of its price, pace and investment strategy, while acknowledging choppier demand and affordability pressure entering the second half.
Jul 23, 2024Positive0.55 - Q1 2024 earnings call
Management framed the quarter as proof that disciplined pricing and inventory decisions can lift both volume and margins, while cautioning that affordability remains a constraint.
Apr 23, 2024Confident0.72 - Q4 2023 earnings call
Management framed 2024 as a year of measured volume growth, prioritizing returns and affordability while rebuilding land capacity.
Jan 30, 2024Positive0.65 - Q3 2023 earnings call
Management framed results around its diversified buyer base, disciplined inventory and land strategy, and affordability tools as higher rates reshape demand.
Oct 24, 2023Positive0.65 - Q2 2023 earnings call
Management framed the quarter as evidence that balanced buyer and production mix can sustain high margins while improving asset turns and cash generation.
Jul 25, 2023Confident0.78 - Q1 2023 earnings call
Management framed the recovery as improving but uneven, emphasizing disciplined starts and asset turns while allowing selective price increases as demand strengthened.
Apr 25, 2023Confident0.72 - Q4 2022 earnings call
Management framed 2023 as a disciplined, adjustable operating year, prioritizing inventory turns and returns while withholding full-year guidance amid uncertain demand.
Jan 31, 2023Mildly positive0.20 - Q3 2022 earnings call
Management framed Q3 as the lagged payoff from early-year demand, while emphasizing a defensive reset as higher rates weakened current sales.
Oct 25, 2022Cautious-0.35 - Q2 2022 earnings call
Management framed the quarter as financially strong but marked by a sharp demand reset, shifting its near-term focus toward quick-move-in inventory and tighter land discipline.
Jul 26, 2022Mildly positive0.15 - Q1 2022 earnings call
Management framed housing demand as strong but supply-constrained, prioritizing controlled production and flexible land investment over maximizing near-term orders.
Apr 28, 2022Positive0.55
Done reading? Open PulteGroup with the chart, filings, and estimates next to this call.
About this transcript
The summary, guidance, analyst focus, and tone are automated and should be checked against the call before being relied on. Names and figures can be misheard. Listen to the replay.