PulteGroup (PHM) Q4 2023 earnings call transcript

Transcript, summary, guidance, and what analysts pressed on from the PulteGroup call on January 29, 2024.

Held
January 29, 2024
Length
1 h 5 min
Tone
Positive0.65
Analysts
11
Words
9,658
2024 closings
approximately 30,000 homesgrowth near lower end
2024 gross margin
28 to 28.5%each quarter
2024 land spend
approximately $5 billionroughly 60-40 development/acquisition
2024 cash flow from operations
approximately $1.8 billion
2024 average sales price
$540,000 to $550,000flat at midpoint
Lots under option
53%long-term goal 70%
Q4 incentives
6.5%up 50 basis points sequentially

Summary

Management framed 2024 as a year of measured volume growth, prioritizing returns and affordability while rebuilding land capacity.

Guidance

  • 2024 closings approximately 30,000 homes
  • Q1 2024 closings 6,200 to 6,600 homes
  • $540K2024 average sales price $540,000 to $550,000
  • 28%2024 gross margin 28% to 28.5% each quarter
  • 9.2%2024 SG&A 9.2% to 9.5% of home sale revenues
  • 10%Q1 2024 SG&A approximately 10% of home sale revenues
  • 24%2024 tax rate 24% to 24.5%
  • $1.8B2024 cash flow from operations approximately $1.8 billion
  • $5B2024 land spend approximately $5 billion
  • 3%2024 average community count up 3% to 5% year over year each quarter

What analysts pressed on

  • 01Pricing and incentives: January strength continued, but affordability makes management cautious about reducing discounts or raising base prices.
  • 02Move-up demand: quarterly orders grew more than 70% year over year, with strong same-store absorption and margins.
  • 03Growth beyond 2024: land for 2025 is contracted or in development; management said 2026 visibility remains incomplete.
  • 04Land-light strategy: owned-lot years should stay around current levels or decrease slightly as the mix shifts toward options.
  • 05Land banking economics: margin impact varies by business mix; management cited a couple of hundred basis points on a relative basis.
  • 06Buybacks: management declined to quantify 2024 repurchases, citing capital priorities and the $1.8 billion authorization.

Notable disclosures

  • January strength followed December's unusual peak-quarter sales month, but management gave no specific January order growth figure.
  • $1.5BLand banking covers approximately 25 communities and $1.5 billion of future land and development spend after 15 months of expansion.
  • 70%At a 70% optioned-lot mix, management estimated 20% to 25% of closings could be from finished lots.
  • 50%Options contributed $80,000 of the $105,000 per-unit option and lot-premium revenue; options typically carry roughly 50% margins.

Risks raised

  • Affordability remains a challenge, keeping incentives elevated despite improving mortgage rates and low resale supply.
  • Land and house-cost inflation is expected to pressure gross margins despite flat pricing assumptions.
  • 2024 community openings are constrained by the 2022 decision to walk away from option lots.
  • Labor availability could pressure costs if industry volumes rise, although management sees less risk to schedules.

Tone: Positive 0.65

Management expressed confidence in demand, January momentum, and long-term growth, while emphasizing affordability, cost inflation, and disciplined returns.

Who spoke

Company

  • Jim ZeumerInvestor Relations
  • Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO
  • Robert O’ShaughnessyChief Financial Officer

Analysts

  • Carl ReichardtAnalyst, BTIG
  • Matthew BouleyAnalyst, Barclays
  • John LovalloAnalyst, UBS
  • Stephen KimAnalyst, Evercore
  • Joe AhlersmeyerAnalyst, Deutsche Bank
  • Michael RehautAnalyst, J.P. Morgan
  • Sam ReidAnalyst, Wells Fargo
  • Ken ZennerAnalyst, Seaport Research Partners
  • Alan RatnerAnalyst, Zellman & Associates
  • Susan MaklariAnalyst, Goldman Sachs
  • Rafe JadrosichAnalyst, Bank of America

Full transcript

Analyst questions are marked with a bar. Timestamps are into the recording.

Prepared remarks

00:00

Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the PulteGroup, Inc. Q4 2023 earnings conference call.

00:00

Jim ZeumerInvestor Relations

I would now like to welcome Jim Zumer, Vice President of Investor Relations, to begin the call. Jim, over to you. Thanks, Monique. Good morning, and let me welcome participants to today's call. We look forward to discussing PulteGroup's strong fourth quarter and full-year financial results. The period ended December 31, 2023. I'm joined on today's call by Ryan Marshall, President and CEO, Bob O'Shaughnessy, Executive Vice President CFO, and Jim Osowski, Senior Vice President Finance. A copy of our earnings release and this morning's presentation slides have been posted to our corporate website at PulteGroup. com. We'll post an audio replay of this call later today. Please note that consistent with this morning's earnings release, we will be discussing our debt ratio on both a gross and net basis.

A reconciliation of our adjusted results to our reported financials is included in this morning's release and within today's webcast slides. Finally, I want to alert everyone that today's presentation includes forward-looking statements about the company's expected future performance. Actual results could differ materially from those suggested by our comments made today. The most significant risk factors that could affect future results are summarized as part of today's earnings release and within the accompanying presentation slides. These risk factors and other key information are detailed in our SEC filings, including our annual and quarterly reports.

Now let me turn the call over to Ryan. Ryan.

01:37

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Thanks, Jim, and good morning. I'm excited to speak with you today about PulteGroup's outstanding fourth quarter and full year financial results. Over the past few years, we have faced macro challenges ranging from COVID to supply chain disruptions to skyrocketing mortgage rates. Through it all, we've remained disciplined and consistent in running our operations, but when needed, have quickly adjusted key business practices to position PulteGroup for ongoing success.

The benefits of this approach can be seen in the strength of our reported results. Bob will detail our Q4 performance, so let me highlight several of our key operating and financial achievements for the full year of 2023. By strategically increasing our spec production, we had more inventory available to meet the demand of first-time homebuyers and those consumers worried about mortgage rate volatility. First house inventory was a critical support to PulteGroup delivering 28,600 homes in 2023 and record home sale revenues of $15.6 billion.

In the face of increased costs for land, labor, and materials, we carefully managed product offerings, pricing, incentives, and absorption paces to maintain high profitability while ensuring we continue to turn our assets. The result? We reported outstanding full-year gross margins of 29.3%, which helped drive a 6% increase in earnings per share to a record $11.72 per share and a 27% return on equity. We also continue to efficiently increase our land pipeline as we completed transactions to put approximately 40,000 new lots under control. Inclusive of these lots, 53% of our total land pipeline is under option, either with the land sellers or through our expanding land banking structures. Since making the decision to expand our use of land banking starting 15 months ago, we have placed approximately 25 communities representing $1.5 billion worth of future land and development spent into such structures.

And finally, consistent with our stated capital allocation priorities, we invested $4.3 billion into the business through land acquisition and development spend in 2023 and returned $1.2 billion to investors through share repurchases, dividends, and debt paydown. Inclusive of our 2023 spend, we have repurchased almost half of the 2013 shares outstanding since initiating the program over a decade ago.

By remaining consistent in our business practices and making market-responsive adjustments where needed, we reported another year of exceptional financial results. I want to thank the entire PulteGroup team for their tireless efforts in support of delivering superior homes and experiences to our homebuyers, while providing outstanding financial returns to our investors. Consistent with the broader housing market, we saw home buying demand being negatively impacted during the early part of the fourth quarter as 30-year mortgage rates increased toward their 2023 peak of 8%. We then saw buyer sentiment and demand improved as mortgage rates finally rolled over, ultimately dropping more than 100 basis points as we moved through November and December. However, the decline in rates helped drive our December net new orders and absorption pace to be the highest month in the quarter.

The increased home buying activity in December was an important driver of the 57% increase in our Q4 net new orders and demonstrates the desire for homeownership remains high across all buyer groups. It remains our view that the long-term outlook for new home construction is extremely positive. A structural shortage of housing caused by years of underbuilding has only been exacerbated by a lack of resale inventory as the owners are financially and or emotionally locked into their low-rate mortgages. While the lack of existing home inventory will resolve itself over time, we believe that land entitlement and labor availability challenges mean it will be difficult to correct for the many years of underbuilding in this country. Given our constructive views on the outlook for housing demand, we are investing in our operations with the goal of growing unit volumes by 5% to 10% annually.

Our decision to walk away from option lots as interest rates increased in 2022 will impact our community openings in 2024, leading to our growth this year being closer to the lower end of this range as we expect closings of approximately 30,000 homes in 2024. For those of you who have followed PulteGroup's story for the past few years, you know it's never been about growth for growth's sake. Our focus is always on investing in our business to build shareholder value, so our objective is to grow our volumes while maintaining high returns on equity. To accomplish this, we must continue to intelligently invest in high-quality and high-returning projects, while continuing to invest in our own assets through the ongoing repurchase of our stock.

As we have demonstrated for much of the past decade, we expect to continue to generate strong cash flows that will allow us to fund our business investment, pay our dividend, and return excess capital to our shareholders, all while maintaining our balance sheet strength and flexibility. Our expectation of continued financial success is reflected in this morning's announcement that our board approved a $1.5 billion increase to our share repurchase authorization.

With many forecasting interest rates to fall, the economy to stay relatively healthy, and conditions in the job market to remain favorable, there are certainly reasons to be optimistic about housing demand in the coming years.

Let me now turn over the call to Bob for a review of our fourth quarter results. Bob?

07:49

Robert O’ShaughnessyChief Financial Officer

Thanks, Ryan, and good morning. As Ryan mentioned in his comments, market conditions changed meaningfully as the fourth quarter progressed and as mortgage rates began to fall. Our report of financial results for the period were influenced by these evolving market dynamics, so I'll note any important areas of impact in my prepared remarks. Home sale revenues in the fourth quarter were $4.2 billion, compared with $5 billion in the prior year.

Our lower home sale revenues for the period primarily reflect a 14% decrease in closings to 7,615 homes, along with a 2% decrease in our average sales price to $547,000. I would highlight that our fourth quarter closings came in about 5% below our previous guide as sales early in the quarter were negatively impacted by higher mortgage rates and the general softening and overall buyer demand. As Ryan noted, unbuying demand accelerated the back half of the quarter, but sales, particularly sales of finished spec homes that would close in the quarter, finished below our assumptions. We could have captured incremental sales and We have a lot of questions about closing value by offering higher incentives, but we didn't see that as a worthwhile tradeoff.

Given that buyer trends have remained positive in January, I think we made the right choices as we have inventory available to meet the stronger demand. Our mix of closings in the quarter were comprised of 40% first-time, 36% move-up, and 24% active adult, which is in alignment with our stated goal for the buyer mix for our business. In the fourth quarter of 2022, closings were 36% first-time, 39% move-up, and 25% active adult. Our average community count for the fourth quarter was 919, which represents an 8% increase over last year's fourth quarter average of 850 communities, and was in line with our prior guidance. Looking at order activity in the quarter, our net new orders increased 57% over The large increase over last year reflects both improved demand in 2023, as well as the extremely difficult operating environment in the fourth quarter of 2022.

As discussed previously, demand conditions grew increasingly difficult early in the fourth quarter this year as mortgage rates climbed to 8%. But we experienced a notable improvement in buying activity as rates decreased over the back half of the quarter. On a sequential basis, our absorption pace improved from November to December, and we would attribute much of this improvement to the decline in interest rates. Along with stronger demand conditions, the year-over-year increase in fourth quarter net new orders benefited from a decrease in cancellation rates. In the most recent quarter, cancellations as a percentage of beginning period backlog fell to 9%, down from 11% in the comparable prior year period. Looking at our order activity by buyer group, fourth quarter net new orders increased 70% for first-time buyers, 78% for move-up buyers, and 15% for active adult buyers.

Our order numbers indicate that demand improved across all buyer groups, which is a very positive dynamic when assessing potential housing demand in 2024. As a result of our sales and closings activity, our quarter-end backlog was 12,146 homes, which is effectively flat with last year. Reflective of the increased mix of first-time buyers and their lower average sales prices, our ending backlog value declined slightly to $7.3 billion. Inclusive of the 7,128 homes we started in the fourth quarter, we ended the year with We have a number of 16,889 homes in production. 44% of our production is spec, including 1,263 finished specs, which puts us in a strong position to meet buyer demand as we head into the spring selling season.

By the end of the fourth quarter, our construction cycle time was down to 130 days, which is a sequential improvement of about two weeks from the end of the third quarter. Moving forward, we continue to target getting our cycle time down to 100 days or below by the end of the year. Based on our production pipeline, we expect closings in the first quarter of 2024 to be between 6,200 and 6,600 homes. And given our units under production, we expect full-year deliveries to grow by 5%, to 30,000 homes. We currently expect the average sales price of closings to remain in the range of $540,000 to $550,000 for the first quarter and the full year of 2024, which is consistent with our fourth quarter pricing.

At the midpoint, this would imply price stability over the course of the year. Our fourth quarter gross margin was 28.9%, which is down approximately 50 basis points from both the fourth quarter of last year and the third quarter of this year, but likely remains the industry leader among the big builders. As with the entire year, our fourth quarter margins reflect higher incentive and input costs. Incentives, which primarily impact revenues, increase 50 basis points sequentially from the third quarter to 6.5%. On the cost side, lower lumber prices offset inflation and other material than labor, but higher land and land development costs impacted margins in the period.

Even my prior comments that we expect pricing to be flat in 2024, we anticipate that land and house cost inflation will result in gross margins to be in the range of 28 to 28.5% for each quarter during the year. We reported fourth quarter SG&A expense of $308 billion, or 7.4% of home sale revenues, compared with prior year SG&A expense of $351 million, or 7.1%. The 30 basis point drop in overhead leverage can be attributed to the lower closings and revenues realized in the quarter versus the prior year. It should be noted that we recorded $65 billion of pre-tax insurance benefits in the fourth quarters of both 2023 and 2022. Based on anticipated closing volumes, we expect SG&A expenses for the full year of 2024 to be in the range of 9.2% to 9.5% of home sale revenues.

Given our typical seasonality of closings, we expect SG&A expenses in the first quarter to be approximately 10% of Homesale revenues, with overhead leverage improving as we move through the remaining quarters of the year. For the fourth quarter, our financial services operations reported pre-tax income of $44 million, which is up from $24 million last year. The improvement of pre-tax income reflects more favorable market conditions across our financial services platform, coupled with higher capture rates, including an increase to 85%, up from 75% last year, in our mortgage operations. Our reported pre-tax income for the most recent quarter was $947 million, compared with prior year pre-tax income of $1.2 billion. In the period, we recorded tax expense of $236 million, or an effective tax rate of 24.9%.

Projecting ahead to 2024, we expect our full year tax rate to be in the range of 24 to 24.5%. Looking at the bottom line, our reported fourth quarter results show net income of $711 billion for $3.28 per share. In the comparable prior year period, we reported net income of $882 million for $3.85 per share. For the full year of 2023, we reported net income of $2.6 billion and a record earnings of $11.72 per share. Reflective of our strong operating results, in 2023 we generated cash flows from operations of $2.2 billion. Given our current expectations for operating and financial results, along with our plans to increase land investment to $5 billion in the coming year, we expect 2024 cash flows from operations to be approximately $1.8 billion.

Turning to our investment in capital allocation activities we invested billion in land acquisition and development in the fourth quarter of which 59 was for development of our existing land assets For the year our land investment totaled billion of which 59 was for development Given our constructive views on near and longer term housing dynamics as noted our plan is to increase our land spend to approximately $5 billion in 2024. We would again anticipate a roughly 60-40 split between development and land acquisition. This increase in investment is consistent with Ryan's earlier comments regarding positioning the business to routinely We will now turn the call over to management for the PulteGrow. Inclusive of our fourth quarter investments, we ended 2023 with 223,000 lots under control, which is an increase of 5% over the prior year.

I would highlight that on a year-over-year basis, we lowered our owned lot count by 4,000 lots, while increasing our lots under option by roughly 16,000 lots. As a result, our percentage of lots under option increased to 53%, up from 48% last year. There's still a lot of runway ahead of us to achieve our goal at 70% option lots, but we're moving in the right direction.

Based on the investments we've made and our anticipated community openings and closings of 2024, In 2024, we expect our average community count in 2024 to be up 3% to 5% in each quarter as compared to the comparable prior year period. Consistent with our stated capital allocation priorities, we continued to return capital to shareholders in 2023. To that end, we paid out $142 million in dividends and have increased our dividend per share by 25% starting in the first quarter of 2024.

We also repurchased 13.8 billion common shares at a cost of $1 billion, or an average price of $72.50 per share, which included $300 million of repurchases, and an average price of $83.03 per share in the fourth quarter. With the 13.8 billion shares acquired in 2023, we have repurchased approximately half of the shares outstanding at the time we initiated the program back in 2013. Having repurchased these shares at an average cost of $32.16 per share, we believe it's been a great investment for our shareholders.

In addition to buying our stock, in the fourth quarter we took advantage of market conditions by using $35 billion in cash on hand to pay down a portion of our debt. For all of 2023, we retired $101 billion of our 2026 and 2027 senior notes through open market transactions, helping to lower our quarter-end debt-to-capital ratio to 15.9%, down 280 basis points from last year.

Adjusting for the $1.8 billion of cash on our balance sheet, we ended the year with a net debt-to-capital ratio of 1.1%. Now let me turn the call back to Ryan for some final comments.

19:19

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Thanks, Bob. Successfully navigating our business through the past 12 months of rising interest rates has been challenging. The same could be said about the past 24, 36, and 48-month periods as we've battled through COVID and the global collapse in supply chains. I am extremely proud of how our entire team responded to these events and the exceptional operating and financial results PulteGroup has delivered over an unprecedented period.

Looking back over the five-year period of 2019 to the just recently completed 2023, we grew volumes 5% annually and delivered just under 135,000 homes. To support our growth during this period and for Over future years, we invested almost $19 billion in cumulative land acquisition and development spend. Through our disciplined land investment, operational focus, and organizational expertise, we capitalized on market conditions to grow earnings per share over this period at a compounded annual growth rate of 34%, while delivering an average annual return on equity of just over 26%. It's this type of strong financial performance during an extended period of market volatility that has prompted increased discussion about the need to reconsider how the large home builders are valued.

I think that if you want to be valued differently, you must demonstrate a fundamental change in how you operate the business and the results you deliver, not just for a year or two, but over an extended period of time. What's different about the past five years is that while investing $19 billion into our operation, we also generated almost $7 billion in net cash flow from operations during this sustained period of growth. In fact, we recorded only one year of negative cash flow from operations since shifting our focus in 2012 from just top-line growth to driving high returns over the housing cycle. We paid off $1.1 billion of debt while cutting our leverage by more than half to end 2023 with a debt-to-capital ratio of 15.9% and a net debt-to-capital ratio of 1.1%.

And we returned $4 billion to shareholders through stock repurchases and dividends. I'd add that the reality is we've been operating our business in just this way for really the past 10 years. I know stocks reflect performance, so I believe that if we can continue to both grow our business and deliver ROE that remains among the industry leaders while generating positive cash flow and maintaining a low risk profile, that our stock price and shareholders will ultimately be rewarded.

Let me now turn the call back to Jim Zoomer.

22:18

Jim ZeumerInvestor Relations

Great. Thanks, Ryan. We're now prepared to open the call for questions, so Mondeep, if you would explain the process.

Questions and answers

22:18

We'll get started. The floor is now open for your questions. To ask a question at this time, simply press the star followed by the number 1 on your telephone keypad. We ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up question. We will now take a moment to compile our roster. Our first question comes from the line of Carl Reichardt with DTIG. Please go ahead.

23:02

Carl ReichardtAnalyst, BTIG

Thanks. Morning, guys. Hope you're doing well. Ryan, I wanted to ask a little bit more about January. Could you maybe expand on how business has been? And what I'm really interested in is, have you seen enough traffic or sales rates to start to think about more broadly pulling incentives down or even starting to raise base across the footprint?

23:23

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Carl, you know, so Bob highlighted in the prepared remarks that, you know, specifically the Q4, October, November were really below expectations, and it was driven by high rates. We had a great December, highest month in the quarter in terms of absolute sales and absorptions per community. So that was certainly an anomaly for typical December seasonal patterns. And the strength has really continued into January, Carl. So we're feeling pretty good about how the year is starting. In terms of kind of where it sets us up for reduced discounts, increased prices, you know, we're going to watch it closely. And I think we've demonstrated through past behavior that we're always looking to find the sweet spot between pace and price.

It won't come as a surprise to you, Carl, that affordability with the buyers remains a challenge. And so I think we're going to have to be thoughtful about what we do on both the incentive and the price increase front. But we're feeling pretty good about how the year started.

24:33

Carl ReichardtAnalyst, BTIG

All right. Thanks for that, Ryan. And then I'm going to ask a couple of questions just on MoveUp. Obviously, the entry-level business has been strong for volumes. MoveUp, a number of your peers have kind of shifted some of their investments more towards the low end. That's been going on for quite some time. Can you talk a little bit about how you look at that business this year? Is there any alteration in mix in terms of communities, and whether or not maybe your can rate in that business is improving faster than the other businesses? We're trying to see if the existing housing market's unlocking enough that you can start to see even more strength in that particular segment.

Thanks.

25:08

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, you know, Carl, our move-up business performed incredibly well in the quarter. We had, on a year-over-year basis, the growth was north of 70%. So, you know, I think that segment performed very well. The margins out of our move-up, as well as our Dell web business, continue to be some of our best gross margins. So, we're seeing real financial strength there also. So, and then in terms of kind of community mix for Carl, we're kind of right in line with where our long-term strategic targets are in terms of kind of that part of our business being about 35% of our overall mix. So, we feel pretty good about where that business is positioned.

25:52

Robert O’ShaughnessyChief Financial Officer

Yeah, just maybe another point of clarification that not only were the sales strong, it was our strongest absorptions on a same-store basis. So that consumer actually has performed well, to Ryan's point, strong margins and absorption.

26:07

Carl ReichardtAnalyst, BTIG

Thank you, Bob. Thanks, Ryan.

26:12

Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Booley with Barclays. Please go ahead.

26:20

Matthew BouleyAnalyst, Barclays

Good morning, everyone. Thanks for all the details and for taking the questions. A question on the high-level growth algorithm that you gave, Ryan, around the kind of 5% to 10% growth annually. You're talking to the low end of that this year because you walked away from some deals in 2022. So my question is, is this kind of a one-year poll, so to speak? And do you have the lands that you need today to kind of get back to your algorithm by 2025? Or how should we think about getting to that level of growth going forward? Thank you.

26:56

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, Matt, thanks for the question. We feel really good about how we position the land pipeline. We've been investing for growth for a number of years, and we've been trying to do it in a very responsible way, specific to having less owned and more optioned land. And, you know, the fact that over the last 15 months, we've made significant headway with our land banking platform has helped with that. So we really like the number of lots that we have under control at 225,000 plus or minus. And we like the ownership structure or the way that we've controlled those lands. We think it's a really capital efficient structure. Specific to your growth target number.

Yeah, we're going to be at the lower end for 2024. Beyond that, we feel that we've got the right structure to be in that range for future periods.

27:52

Robert O’ShaughnessyChief Financial Officer

Maybe I'd add to that. The land for 25 is under contract and probably in development right now. We have line of sight to 24, 25. You get out to 26, we're still working through some of that, But, you know, you can see from the approvals that we did in this most recent quarter or for the year, 40,000 lots, no issues from our perspective in terms of lining up that type of growth rate.

28:25

Matthew BouleyAnalyst, Barclays

Got it. Okay, that's super helpful. Thanks, guys. Second one, back to the gross margin question. I think you're guiding 24 margins to be down at roughly 70 basis points from where you exited. I think I heard you say, Bob, that it's kind of flat pricing, and then you've got some headwinds in land labor and materials. I'm just curious if you'd kind of unpack that a little bit and maybe specifically focus on the land side. How are you kind of thinking about those headwinds to the margin, and how does that kind of play into that guide in 2024? Thank you.

29:02

Robert O’ShaughnessyChief Financial Officer

Yeah, fair question. And I think we laid it out this way to try and answer that question. I'll give you a little more color. We see pricing flat during the year. Now, you might see different pricing at different consumer groups. The first time is the most affordability challenge. That's where we saw actually the biggest decline in the current quarter. But we think pricing is relatively flat through 24. We see modest, call it 2% to 4% house construction cost increases, kind of mid to upper single digit land increases, which is what we've experienced this year. And so when you kind of mix that all together, the one other point I guess I'd offer to clarify is we're assuming incentive loads stay about the same at the 6.5% that we saw in this quarter.

So when you marry that all up together, a little bit of a decline year over year, but still 28 to 28.5%, pretty strong margin.

30:11

Matthew BouleyAnalyst, Barclays

Perfect. All right. Thanks, Bob. Thanks, Ryan. Good luck, guys.

30:13

Our next question comes from the line of John Lovalloe with UBS. Please go ahead.

30:24

John LovalloAnalyst, UBS

Hey, guys. Thank you for taking my questions. The first one, just maybe talking about January again, curious how orders looked versus normal seasonality, if you will. I think first quarter absorptions typically rise, call it 40% to 45% sequentially. Is there anything that would preclude that from happening, in your opinion, outside of rates maybe in the first quarter of this year?

30:51

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, John, we didn't give a specific increase out of December. We kept more of our commentary around the qualitative side of things, which I'd reiterate, we're very pleased with how things were performing. We will be performing in January, and we expect that strength to continue. We continue to be in a situation where there's low supply. Affordability has definitely gotten better. You heard Bob's comment about what we've assumed with our incentive load. I'd expect us to have a strong Q1. The other thing I'd offer that's probably of note is we're starting to see some real signs of life in our Western markets.

You know, those have been – that's been a part of the country that was slow for the majority of kind of 2022 and most all of 2023. But, you know, in the last 30 to 45 days, we're really starting to see those markets pick up, which is, you know, a welcomed outcome.

31:56

John LovalloAnalyst, UBS

Makes sense. And then on the share buyback that I was encouraging to see, I think could be a good driver of returns as we move forward here. Over the past few years, I think you guys have done about a billion per year. You know, the authorization now is closer to 1.8. How are you thinking about 2024 buybacks relative to the past few years? I mean, should we expect north of a billion?

32:21

Robert O’ShaughnessyChief Financial Officer

You know, honestly, I'm going to defer. We typically do. We report the news on that. I think you highlight we done about a billion dollars a year the last couple of years We have a billion eight cash We have offered that we project about a billion eight of cash flow from operations in the current year So our capital allocation priorities don change You know we said we going to increase our land investment to five billion That's up about 16% year over year. We increased our dividend 25%. You know, that's not a huge cash element, but still, I think, reflective of our confidence in the business. You know, we do have a billion aid of authorization.

And like I said, we'll report the news. You saw this year we bought back $100 million of our notes because it was attractive. The rate environment has made that a little less attractive, but we always look at liability management as part of the equation. So really no change to our capital allocation priorities.

33:25

John LovalloAnalyst, UBS

Okay. Thank you, guys.

33:30

Our next question comes from the line of Stephen Kim with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

33:37

Stephen KimAnalyst, Evercore

Yeah, thanks very much, guys. First question relates to your land on the balance sheet. I think that your cash flow guide seems to suggest, at least for my modeling, a modest rise in your own lot count while you keep a year's supply of owned lots fairly stable. I was wondering if that's right and if there's any opportunity or desire to actually reduce your land holdings in years further.

34:07

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, Stephen, so a couple things there. We are increasing our land spend in 2024 from $4.3 billion to $5 billion. Our mix of developed spend versus land acquisition spend will continue to probably be about 60% development, 40% land act, and then our long-term desire is to have 70% of our land controlled via option. You know, we highlighted in the prepared remarks this year we moved that 48% option to 53% controlled via option. So we're, you know, I think both in, we demonstrated through results over the past number of years as well as kind of articulated long-term goals, we want to be land lighter. We're going to continue to do it the right way, all with an eye toward delivering, you know, a lower risk model.

That's very capital efficient as well.

35:11

Stephen KimAnalyst, Evercore

Well, I guess, Ryan, I mean, you gave most of that information in your opening remarks, so I appreciate that. But I guess the gist of my question, trying to incrementally understand what your plans are a little bit more, is to try to understand the actual amount of owned lots. Are you looking to get to your 70% optioned versus owned mix by keeping your owned lot count kind of flat or year supply flat with where you are, or are you actually looking to reduce that in addition to increasing your optioned lot exposure to kind of get to that 70% eventually?

35:49

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Stephen, in terms of years-owned, we'd expect to probably keep that right around the level that we're at, maybe a slight decrease. Ultimately, we would start to flip from years-owned to years-option. You'll see a little bit of a trade in that mix.

36:09

Stephen KimAnalyst, Evercore

Okay, that helps. And then when you talked about land banking and continuing to increase that, could you describe for us the, you know, when you think generally about what you're seeing in the market in terms of pricing, in terms of, you know, the way these negotiations are going with your land bankers, what kind of anticipated, you know, haircut to gross margin do you typically get when you go from just sort of buying versus, you know, doing a land option? And what's the benefit What's the trade-off, basically, in your mind? Some rules of thumb for us.

36:45

Robert O’ShaughnessyChief Financial Officer

I don't know that there's a hard and fast answer to that, Stephen. It depends on the mix of the business that we've got. In terms of margin, it can be a couple of hundred basis points on a relative basis. And in terms of inventory turns, certainly it's going to be more efficient than a bulk raw transaction, but it depends on the life of the asset. So in Dell Web, it's going to be very different than it is in the Centex business for us. So I wouldn't want to paint that with too broad a brush.

37:28

Stephen KimAnalyst, Evercore

Okay. Okay. That's fine. I appreciate it. Okay. Thanks, guys. You too.

37:33

Our next question comes from a line of Joe Ahlersmeyer with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

37:43

Joe AhlersmeyerAnalyst, Deutsche Bank

Yeah, thanks very much. Good morning, everybody. Just a question on the assumption on the incentive load in the gross margin guidance. I'm wondering if that represents more just a state of conservatism right now, waiting to see what happens with rates further, Or if it's more about your philosophy as rates fall, that you might allow that to flow through to affordability and drive volume versus letting it be a big margin benefit. If you could just talk about that tradeoff.

38:14

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, Joe, we've, you know, I think the reason we've assumed that the incentive load stays about where it is is just because affordability continues to be challenged. So we've got low supply, but interest rates are relatively higher, and because of low supply, I think there's still some pressure on prices being elevated historically. So we've talked a lot in 2023 about how successful we were in helping to solve some of the affordability challenges with the incentive dollars that we put toward the forward mortgage commitments.

We'll continue to use that as a tool in 2024. Now, as rates fall, we think the cost of those mortgage rate commitments will become less. We've made an assumption that we reallocate some of those incentive dollars to other things that help to solve the affordability challenge and get a buyer into their home. So, you know, is it conservative? Time will tell. I think what you've seen from us historically is, you know, we're not afraid to raise price. We're not afraid to cut discounts. And, you know, we're always looking to optimize pace and price. You've also heard me talk the last several quarters, we're not going to be margin proud. So we're doing things to be responsive to what the market is, to derive an outcome that yields the best return for our shareholders.

And you'll see us actively managing all things, pay, price, incentives, forward mortgage commitments, et cetera.

39:57

Joe AhlersmeyerAnalyst, Deutsche Bank

Understood. Thanks a lot for that. And I appreciate your comments about the valuation. It sounds like you think that cash flow is a bigger part of that, potentially even than just a percentage of option lots or any metric on the land side. It's about the cash flow. I tend to agree. And so just wondering if you are internally starting to think about your leverage in the context of cash flow or profits and not so much on what it makes up relative to your inventory balance. It's kind of thinking almost more like a manufacturer or distributor, because right now you're in that depth at about 13 days of operating profits. It's just thinking about the potential for using more debt going forward.

Thanks.

40:38

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, that's an interesting question. You know, I'm not sure we can think like a manufacturing company completely. The risk profiles are different, but having said that, I think they're, you know, based on the strength of the operation, based on the cash flow that we've consistently shown despite growth, which historically is not the way this industry has behaved, you know, we believe there is an opportunity for people to think a little bit differently about the equity in terms of how we manage the leverage on the balance sheet. A lot of that will have to do with our opportunities to invest in the business and what we do on the share repurchases.

But, you know, even, you know, you look at the rating agencies, they've been slow, but they've been responsive to kind of, I think, seeing the value in the business model and also the way the debt gets looked at. So would we use more debt for something? Without question, if it were for the right thing.

41:43

Joe AhlersmeyerAnalyst, Deutsche Bank

That's helpful, Bob. Thanks so much. Take care.

41:47

Our next question comes from a line of Michael Rehote with J. P. Morgan. Please go ahead.

41:55

Michael RehautAnalyst, J.P. Morgan

Thanks. Appreciate it. I wanted to circle back just on incentives and where we are today and to the extent that there's the potential for those to decline. How we should think about the impact on 24. So when you talk about, I think, assuming in 2024, 6.5% of a load rate for incentives, and I believe you said that was similar to the fourth quarter. If you could just remind us where you were in the fourth quarter versus the third and earlier in the year, and to the extent that, you know, perhaps incentives tick down a little bit in the first quarter of 24, should we be thinking that that would be a 3Q or a 4Q impact, just trying to get the sense there of the lag?

42:51

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, Mike, I'll take the first part of that, and then I'll have Bob do the last piece. So, we're up 50 basis points from Q3. We were 6% in Q3, 6.5% in Q4. You know, in terms of what that means for 2024, you know, I think I addressed it on a prior call. We're going to actively be managing our incentive load, but we've shared with you what our assumption is in current form. If there's an opportunity to peel those back, we'll do it, and we'll certainly share that with you. So in terms of kind of the quarter that it would impact, right now about 50%, somewhere around 50% of our sales are spec. So those are closing in kind of the following quarter.

Other spec sales now would either be late Q1 closings or early Q2 closings. If it's a dirt sale, Q1 closings typically end up being Q3 or early Q4 closings. So, you know, we factored all of those assumptions into the margin guide that we gave for the year, which is, you know, 28 to 28 and a half to repeat that.

44:08

Robert O’ShaughnessyChief Financial Officer

And then, Bob, I don't know if you have the incentive load for Q1, Q2. I think that was the only thing that didn't answer. It was about 6% in each of the first, second, and third quarters. And it was 4.3% in the fourth quarter of last year.

44:25

Michael RehautAnalyst, J.P. Morgan

Great. No, that's helpful. Thank you for that. You know, I guess, secondly, I'd love to kind of shift a little bit to the SG&A side. I think he gave guidance for the first quarter, but you've been running the last couple of years, plus or minus, around 9%, low 9%. Obviously, we've heard a little bit about higher commission rates coming back, maybe in a more choppy market at points in the past year or so. So, you know, overall solid market, but still we've heard a little bit about commissions maybe coming up a little bit.

How should we think about, you know, SG&A and the potential for further leverage over the next couple of years against a, you know, the growth algorithm that you talked about? And if commissions, let's say, are stable from here, you know, could we see an 8% at some point or getting closer to an 8% number? I just love your thoughts on that.

45:28

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, Mike, I think we've always been thoughtful in how we spend SG&A dollars. We have historically made some extra investments in the quality of the homes that we build and deliver, in the customer experience that we provide for our homeowners, And we invest incremental dollars in the culture of our workforce. So we've tried to maintain balance within the SG&A structure as well. We're not trying to run kind of the leanest and, you know, on the lean end. We're also not trying to overspend. I think we're trying to be very balanced. In terms of the leverage for 2024 specifically, we've given the guide, which will put us in the low nines. That's really reflective of what Bob guided to on the average sales price, which we're expecting to be flat.

Against that, you've still got wage inflation for our internal employees running close to 3.5%, 4%. So, you know, there's some, you know, pressure. There's pressure on the SG&A front that we're not necessarily getting the benefit of on the ASP increase side. So, in terms of kind of where it goes into the future, time will tell, but, you know, we've given the best visibility that we can for 2024.

46:59

Michael RehautAnalyst, J.P. Morgan

Bob, I don't know if you anything you'd add on this, G&A.

46:59

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

You know, Bob keeps us honest. They'll tell you that. We're not overspending anywhere, at least not under Bob's watch.

47:17

Michael RehautAnalyst, J.P. Morgan

Great. Thank you.

47:22

Our next question comes from the line of Sam Reid with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

47:29

Sam ReidAnalyst, Wells Fargo

Hey, thanks so much, guys, for taking my question here. Wanted to drill down a little bit on the first-time buyer. You guys have given a lot of good color on pricing. It does sound like price did move lower for this buyer group a bit again during the quarter. Maybe help us unpack the relative split, perhaps between higher incentives for this buyer group as you try to make these homes more affordable versus perhaps some of the other affordability levers that you might be pulling, like smaller Any color here would be appreciated.

48:04

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, I would tell you, if you look year over year, pricing at $4.22 to that buyer is down 6%. Year over year, it was down about 1% versus the trailing quarter, so the third quarter of this year. And I would tell you, it is largely incentive-related. And, you know, so we're not, we haven't in the last three months or the last 12 months had a radical redesign of the product that we're offering to people. You know, communities, when they get entitled, you have product approvals. You know, so to a degree, you can see people saying, I want the smaller floor plan. I would tell you that's not the driver of the price change. It is the incentive load that we introduced.

So it's that, you know, 220 basis points, which for that buyer, If the PulteGroup is about call it that the price decline No that helpful And maybe one more on pricing here just from a slightly different vantage point You guys have given good color in the past on option and lot premiums and the impact on ASP I want to say it been around 100K or north of 100K across your entire mix throughout 2023 Curious as to where that trended in Q4 and maybe give us a sense as to your outlook for that piece of the price component into 2024 Yeah, in the fourth quarter, it was $105,000 per unit, so it's down about $4,000 versus the prior year.

And so I think that speaks to the sales team, and I give them a lot of credit. You know, where we've needed incentive has been less around options and lot premiums and more oriented towards financing. So we didn't see a big change there, which I think is a real positive. It also is interestingly, for that move up and active adult buyer, and we've highlighted the relative strength from them in this quarter and the relative pricing strength there. So just like our first time was down about 6%, our move up pricing was actually flat quarter over quarter, and our active adult was actually up 3%. And I think it's reflective of the way we go to market, the way we sell the lots that we've got, the options that people put in houses.

So, you know, our teams are still doing a really good job of, you know, providing value for that which people desire.

50:38

Sam ReidAnalyst, Wells Fargo

Helpful caller all around. I'll pass it on, guys. Thanks.

50:41

Our next question comes from a line of Ken Zenner with Seaport Research Partners. Please go ahead.

50:53

Ken ZennerAnalyst, Seaport Research Partners

Morning, everybody. Again, I've got two very simple questions. First is on land banking. What percent of closings do you expect to be from finished lots once you reach your 70 percent, you know, option? One scenario? Generally.

51:14

Robert O’ShaughnessyChief Financial Officer

That's an interesting question. Certainly the land banking would be finished lots, but for the optionality that we have with individual sellers, many of those were self-developing. And so I don't have any questions.

51:32

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, Mike, and this is a little bit of a guess, can roughly 20 to 25 percent of our total closings, once we get to 70-30, will be finished lots. You know, the rest will be a lot of optionality in there, but to Bob's point, a lot of our options we take down as, you know, raw land chunks, and then we self-develop those.

You know, still highly efficient. It's just a different form of, you know, an option structure.

52:08

Ken ZennerAnalyst, Seaport Research Partners

Right. I assume that's kind of reflecting your entry-level exposure as well. Second question is, talk to options. Again, could you update us what percent of your ASP is coming from options? And then comment on the margin benefit you get from that, if you could, so we could discern, you know, your operating construction costs versus your strategy of bringing in these options. Thank you. Sorry, I want to make sure I understand the $40,000, the $105,000 of your scale, how much of it is options?

No, I think it's that. Right. Your total ASP, you have a certain option exposure, more at move-up and active adult, but could you talk to the margin impact of that as well? Thank you.

52:57

Robert O’ShaughnessyChief Financial Officer

Yeah, so of the $105,000 of option and lot premium, $80,000 is options. $25,000, that's lots premium. I could say, for instance, lot premiums are pure margin. I'm not sure that that's fair, right? Pricing doesn't really work that way. But in terms of the option spend, typically it's going to have a relatively rich margin mix, call it 50%. And so it is accretive to the overall margin. And, you know, the way we try and go to market, Ken, and I don't know if this answers it better, you know, we put a base price house that we think is kind of market standard and what people can and should expect to pay for that house. Then we start talking about, okay, which lot do you want?

What are you willing to pay for that lot? That's what generates the $25,000. And then, okay, now in the house, if we're offering optionality, and we don't for everyone, right? So for the centex buyer, we may have curated packages or no choices at all. But for the folks that can do structural options or fit and finish, that's what's driving that $80,000 of incremental revenue.

54:21

Ken ZennerAnalyst, Seaport Research Partners

Thank you very much.

54:22

Our next question comes from the line of Alan Ratner with Zellman & Associates. Please go ahead.

54:33

Alan RatnerAnalyst, Zellman & Associates

Hey guys, good morning. Thanks for all the details so far. Question on cycle times. So, congrats on the improvement there. Sounds like you expect to see further improvement in 24. I'm curious, to get to the 100-day target from 130 where you're at right now, you guys are targeting 5% growth. We've heard some other builders maybe a little bit higher than that. Is there a level from a labor perspective where if builders try to push starts more significantly that you think cycle time improvement might stall a bit? Are there any constraints that you could foresee, or is the unleashing of kind of the normalization of the supply chain just kind of independent of whatever the start pace might look like in 2024?

55:21

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, and it's a fair question. Based on the total amount of production that's happening, I don't see the industry stressing the labor availability. I'm not suggesting there's a whole bunch of excess labor running around out there, but at least for the big builders, I think we've got great trade relationships.

And I think we'll continue to get not only scheduled performance, but the labor on our job sites. I think the pressure likely comes on dollars or more so than time. If we're running into labor pinches because of a volume increase, I think it's probably dollars more than time. A lot of the decreases that we'll take, it'll be because we're getting things on a predictable schedule like we used to pre-COVID. So, that's working better, which allows us to take some kind of dead days out of our schedule that we had.

You know, we built in for things to go wrong or for time when we were just literally waiting for material to show up. So, it's a little bit of that, a little bit of, you know, we're just getting back to the cycle times that we had pre-COVID. So, we trimmed out about 30 or so days in 2024, or in 2023, rather. We think we can get another 30 or so days by the end of 2024, and we'll be back largely in line with pre-COVID cycle times.

57:00

Alan RatnerAnalyst, Zellman & Associates

Great. Appreciate those added thoughts, Ryan. And then, I guess in a similar vein, I was curious if you could just give an update on the ICG growth plans there and kind of how that's been trending and what your current thinking is as far as additional market expansion, if there is any.

57:18

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, Alan, it continues to go well. We have two plants today. Both are focused in the southeast part of the U. S. Our growth plans are still largely on target to have approximately eight factories. So, we haven't announced anything new.

Similar to our share buybacks, we'll probably report the news on that as opposed to give forward-looking forecasts.

57:48

Alan RatnerAnalyst, Zellman & Associates

I guess if I could sneak one in on that, it's hard for us to conceptualize what impact that has on your business. Obviously, it's concentrated in a handful of markets right now, but are there certain metrics that you can share with us, whether it's cycle times or costs, margin, etc. , that you can demonstrate on a case study basis how that's contributing to your business right now?

58:10

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, Alan, so that's – we haven't given a bunch of guidance on that just because it is concentrated into a couple of markets, and we don't feel it's appropriate to extrapolate the entire enterprise yet. As we get further down the path, we'll share more. Conceptually, it's exactly what you highlighted. We're getting cycle time improvements, we're getting better quality, and there are some raw material cost savings that we believe we're getting as well.

58:37

Alan RatnerAnalyst, Zellman & Associates

I appreciate that. Thanks a lot.

58:40

Our next question comes from a line of Susan McCleary with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

58:49

Susan MaklariAnalyst, Goldman Sachs

Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for fitting me in. My first question is just around the specs. You mentioned that you had about 44%, I think, of your production that's in spec. As you think about the year and the way that the demand may come together, any thoughts on where that may move or how you're thinking about it longer term?

59:09

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, Susan, I wouldn't anticipate a massive change from the percentage. We're probably on the higher end of the range that we'll have in spec right now. Specific to the fourth quarter, we put more spec starts in the ground than what we sold, and that was intentional. We wanted to have some additional inventory going into the spring selling season, which we have. So, you know, as we move throughout the year, probably right in line with where we're at or a tad lower.

59:42

Susan MaklariAnalyst, Goldman Sachs

Okay, that's helpful. And then when we think generally about the potential for rates to come down this year and that possibly driving some increase on the existing home side of the market, any thoughts on what the implications of that could be, especially perhaps on the move up and the active adult parts of the businesses and any initiatives you have? What do you have relative to that?

1:00:06

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, Susan, I, you know, with the rate cuts that are forecasted, I don't see it being at a level that's going to unleash a tidal wave of resale inventory. So, you know, is it better than where we're at today? Certainly. Will that start to free up some resale inventory? I think so. And I think that's probably helpful against the backdrop of we continue to be undersupplied in the country. So on balance, I don't think it has much impact at all on what we're projecting for our business in 2024.

1:00:47

Susan MaklariAnalyst, Goldman Sachs

Okay. Thanks for the color and good luck.

1:00:49

Our final question comes from the line of Rafe Dradrofik with Bank of America, where we've reached the time allotment for this morning's call. Please go ahead.

1:01:10

Rafe JadrosichAnalyst, Bank of America

Great. Thank you. Thanks for taking my questions. In terms of the additional 30 days of build cycle improvement you're expecting for 2024, can you talk about what the build cycles are in homes that you're starting today? Are you already at that 100-day level, and is that improvement embedded in your cash flow guide?

1:01:33

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, Ray, it's a fair question. Homes that we're starting today will deliver in Q2, basically. So, no, we're not at the 100 days yet. Now, that being said, there are some markets and some communities where we are at the 100 days, and in fact, we were at the 100 days last year. When you blend it all together, we think it'll be Q4 before we're at the 100 days that we've highlighted as our goal.

1:02:11

Robert O’ShaughnessyChief Financial Officer

And, Ravs, our guide does factor in what we see in terms of cycle times during the year, the cash flow guide, to your question.

1:02:18

Rafe JadrosichAnalyst, Bank of America

Thank you. That's helpful. And then you gave a really helpful caller in terms of the land inflation you're expecting in your gross margin for 2024, and you have the land that you need through 2025. On the land that you're contracting today, what are you seeing in terms of inflation? Is it at a similar level, or are you actually seeing that come down? And then can you kind of help us understand the difference between development cost inflation relative to what you're seeing for raw land?

1:02:54

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Yeah, so – sorry, I forgot the first part of the question. You spoke about the land inflation in the – Oh, I got it. I'm sorry. You know, we, you know, listen, it's interesting. Land prices don't come down very often. You know, they're sticky. And we've seen and we've highlighted, you know, sort of sequential increases in lot costs. I would tell you that the land we're seeing today is consistent with that. You know, prices are pretty robust, and it's a pretty competitive landscape out there. We have the right to return, so we look to see can we get return out of that. So I think no change, honestly, in the land market. In terms of the inflationary aspect, what we are seeing is that that labor constraint influences the development of land, just like it does building of houses.

And with general cost inflation that we were seeing last year in particular, it was influencing the suspense of pipe. Everything that we do to do the development of the communities was running pretty hot, too. So, again, we've highlighted we think it's going to be a little bit more expensive in terms of our lot increase this year for 24. And, again, I think that just reflects all the activity that was going on. And some of the cost inflation that we saw in 23 feeding into our lots this year in 24.

Good news is, you know, the vertical we're seeing, you know, pretty benign in my market, whereas that had been running pretty hot last year, obviously. So the slowdown in inflation, we feel it now in the house. Hopefully we'll feel that a little bit later in land. It would be an opportunity for us, for sure.

1:04:57

Rafe JadrosichAnalyst, Bank of America

Great. Thank you. Appreciate all the caller.

1:04:58

Ryan MarshallPresident and CEO

Thanks, Rick.

1:05:00

I would now like to turn the call over to Jim Zoomer for closing remarks.

1:05:05

Jim ZeumerInvestor Relations

I appreciate everybody's time this morning. We'll certainly be available over the rest of the day if you have any additional questions. Otherwise, we'll look forward to speaking with you on our next conference call. This concludes today's call. You may now disconnect.

Other PulteGroup earnings calls

  • Q3 2026 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as a sharp late-period demand slowdown, prioritizing margins and disciplined capital allocation over chasing volume.

    Oct 22, 2026Mildly positive0.18
  • Q2 2026 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as evidence its strategy can grow orders while restoring built-to-order sales and reducing specs, despite uneven demand and affordability pressures.

    Jul 22, 2026Positive0.55
  • Q1 2026 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as resilient amid uncertainty, emphasizing disciplined starts, lower finished-spec inventory and a deliberate return to built-to-order sales.

    Apr 23, 2026Positive0.55
  • Q4 2025 earnings call

    Management framed 2025 as a challenging but validating year for its diversified, disciplined model, while positioning 2026 around community growth and a gradual return to build-to-order sales.

    Jan 29, 2026Mildly positive0.35
  • Q3 2025 earnings call

    Management framed resilient operations and disciplined starts as strengths, while emphasizing cautious buyers, elevated specs and a lower fourth-quarter margin outlook.

    Oct 21, 2025Mildly positive0.15
  • Q2 2025 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as evidence that diversification and disciplined inventory and land management can protect returns despite volatile, increasingly competitive demand.

    Jul 22, 2025Mildly positive0.35
  • Q1 2025 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as broadly in line with plans, while April volatility prompted a more cautious volume outlook and continued prioritization of price and margin.

    Apr 22, 2025Mildly positive0.10
  • Q4 2024 earnings call

    Management framed 2025 as a return-focused year, prioritizing disciplined pricing and adjustable production over pursuing volume growth in a tougher affordability environment.

    Jan 30, 2025Mildly positive0.25
  • Q3 2024 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as operationally strong but stressed affordability, rate volatility and elevated incentives as the key constraints on near-term demand and margins.

    Oct 22, 2024Positive0.55
  • Q2 2024 earnings call

    Management framed a strong first half as evidence of its price, pace and investment strategy, while acknowledging choppier demand and affordability pressure entering the second half.

    Jul 23, 2024Positive0.55
  • Q1 2024 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as proof that disciplined pricing and inventory decisions can lift both volume and margins, while cautioning that affordability remains a constraint.

    Apr 23, 2024Confident0.72
  • Q3 2023 earnings call

    Management framed results around its diversified buyer base, disciplined inventory and land strategy, and affordability tools as higher rates reshape demand.

    Oct 24, 2023Positive0.65
  • Q2 2023 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as evidence that balanced buyer and production mix can sustain high margins while improving asset turns and cash generation.

    Jul 25, 2023Confident0.78
  • Q1 2023 earnings call

    Management framed the recovery as improving but uneven, emphasizing disciplined starts and asset turns while allowing selective price increases as demand strengthened.

    Apr 25, 2023Confident0.72
  • Q4 2022 earnings call

    Management framed 2023 as a disciplined, adjustable operating year, prioritizing inventory turns and returns while withholding full-year guidance amid uncertain demand.

    Jan 31, 2023Mildly positive0.20
  • Q3 2022 earnings call

    Management framed Q3 as the lagged payoff from early-year demand, while emphasizing a defensive reset as higher rates weakened current sales.

    Oct 25, 2022Cautious-0.35
  • Q2 2022 earnings call

    Management framed the quarter as financially strong but marked by a sharp demand reset, shifting its near-term focus toward quick-move-in inventory and tighter land discipline.

    Jul 26, 2022Mildly positive0.15
  • Q1 2022 earnings call

    Management framed housing demand as strong but supply-constrained, prioritizing controlled production and flexible land investment over maximizing near-term orders.

    Apr 28, 2022Positive0.55

All PulteGroup transcripts

Done reading? Open PulteGroup with the chart, filings, and estimates next to this call.

About this transcript

The summary, guidance, analyst focus, and tone are automated and should be checked against the call before being relied on. Names and figures can be misheard. Listen to the replay.